Thermal conductivity of graphene and graphene oxide nanoplatelets

The superior thermal transport in graphene has been a topic of great interest to the scientific community, for graphene is envisioned to be important in numerous applications such as thermal management of electronics. While single layer graphene exhibits high thermal conductivity, molecular and lattice dynamics simulations reveal that even in the presence of one or few additional layers, thermal conductivity can be significantly reduced. In fact, with increasing number of layers, thermal conductivity is expected to eventually approach the value of bulk graphite. The interlayer spacing is also known to have a significant influence on thermal conductivity, for it is the combination of the number of layers and the spacing between them that truly is responsible for the thermal conductivity of a multi-layer graphene platelet. Here, we report the experimentally obtained thermal conductivities for nanoplatelets of graphene oxide and reduced graphene exfoliated to differing degrees. Results show that the thermal conductivity measured for reduced graphene platelets with ~ 30 to 45 layers approaches the value of bulk graphite. The thermal conductivity of oxygen intercalated graphene nanoplatelets with ~ 3 layers and 7% oxygen is higher than bulk graphite with similar interlayer spacing. Despite the increased interlayer spacing and presence of the oxygen atoms, which typically enhances phonon scattering, the high value of thermal conductivity can be attributed to the increase in the interlayer coupling due to covalent interactions provided by the oxygen atoms.

[1]  C. Nan,et al.  A simple model for thermal conductivity of carbon nanotube-based composites , 2003 .

[2]  S. Stankovich,et al.  Graphene-based composite materials , 2006, Nature.

[3]  C. N. Lau,et al.  PROOF COPY 020815APL Extremely high thermal conductivity of graphene: Prospects for thermal management applications in nanoelectronic circuits , 2008 .

[4]  Z. Dai,et al.  Application of the thermal flash technique for low thermal diffusivity micro/nanofibers. , 2009, The Review of scientific instruments.

[5]  B. Ai,et al.  Chirality- and thickness-dependent thermal conductivity of few-layer graphene: a molecular dynamics study , 2011, 1111.5611.

[6]  Yunfei Chen,et al.  In-plane lattice thermal conductivities of multilayer graphene films , 2011 .

[7]  M. Itkis,et al.  Graphite Nanoplatelet−Epoxy Composite Thermal Interface Materials , 2007 .

[8]  Li Shi,et al.  Two-Dimensional Phonon Transport in Supported Graphene , 2010, Science.

[9]  Quanshui Zheng,et al.  Effects of anisotropy, aspect ratio, and nonstraightness of carbon nanotubes on thermal conductivity of carbon nanotube composites , 2007 .

[10]  A. Abramson,et al.  The thermal flash technique: the inconsequential effect of contact resistance and the characterization of carbon nanotube clusters. , 2012, The Review of scientific instruments.

[11]  H. Katzman,et al.  Characterization of high thermal conductivity carbon fibers and a self-reinforced graphite panel , 1998 .

[12]  Samia Subrina,et al.  Dimensional crossover of thermal transport in few-layer graphene. , 2010, Nature materials.

[13]  Heremans,et al.  Thermal conductivity and thermopower of vapor-grown graphite fibers. , 1985, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[14]  C. N. Lau,et al.  Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. , 2008, Nano letters.

[15]  Ravi Prasher,et al.  Graphene Spreads the Heat , 2010, Science.

[16]  Barton,et al.  Determination of lattice defects in carbon fibers by means of thermal-conductivity measurements. , 1991, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.