Consequences of governance restructuring for quality of urban living in the transformation era in Beijing: A view of job accessibility

One of the major issues concerning present-day public policy in a transitional and developing country is its ability to enhance the quality of urban living and individual social well-being in the context of rapid urban growth. A dramatic decline in overall job accessibility due to increases in commuting time is already a serious problem affecting the quality of urban living in Beijing. Understanding the impact of governance restructuring on overall job accessibility is of primary importance if politicians are to make policy innovations in development management. This paper applies the institutionalist approach to analyse the impact of governance restructuring on job accessibility. The analysis shows that current governance restructuring has a negative effect on overall job accessibility due to competition between different local governments increasing the degree of spatial fragmentation; revenue-enhancing development introducing constraints affecting the local jobs-housing balance; and the coexistence of the old planning system alongside the new market system leading to a fragmented land-use right transfer mechanism, intensifying scattered and low-density development. With respect to future policy, stronger municipal development management might be one direction in implementing public policy to enhance overall job accessibility, insofar as it addresses the negative impact of fragmented development management in the current transformation process.

[1]  R. Camagni,et al.  Urban mobility and urban form: the social and environmental costs of different patterns of urban expansion , 2002 .

[2]  B. Dale.  An Institutionalist Approach to Local Restructuring , 2002 .

[3]  Laurence J. C. Ma,et al.  Restructuring the Chinese City: Changing Society, Economy and Space , 2004 .

[4]  Marie – Hélène Zérah,et al.  Conflict between green space preservation and housing needs: The case of the Sanjay Gandhi National Park in Mumbai , 2007 .

[5]  G. Macleod,et al.  Space, scale and state strategy: rethinking urban and regional governance , 1999 .

[6]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Analysis of Environmental Costs of Mobility Due to Urban Sprawl a Modelling Study on Italian Cities , 2006 .

[7]  E. R. Alexander,et al.  Institutional Transformation and Planning: From Institutionalization Theory to Institutional Design , 2005 .

[8]  Peng Ping.  Housing Suburbanization and Employment Spatial Mismatch in Beijing , 2007 .

[9]  A. Yeh.  Dual Land Market and Internal Spatial Structure of Chinese Cities , 2002 .

[10]  Jon Pierre,et al.  Partnerships in urban governance : European and American experience , 1998 .

[11]  Jean C. Oi.  Fiscal Reform and the Economic Foundations of Local State Corporatism in China , 1992, World Politics.

[12]  A. Shaw,et al.  Metropolitan restructuring in post-liberalized India: Separating the global and the local☆ , 2007 .

[13]  F. Deng,et al.  Uneven land reform and urban sprawl in China: the case of Beijing , 2004 .

[14]  D. Hensher.  Handbook of Transport Geography and Spatial Systems , 2004 .

[15]  Robert Cervero,et al.  THE TRANSPORTATION-LAND USE CONNECTION STILL MATTERS , 1995 .

[16]  Laurence J. C. Ma,et al.  Urban Transformation in China, 1949 – 2000: A Review and Research Agenda , 2002 .

[17]  X. Zhao,et al.  The Influence of Bureaucratic Behavior on Land Apportionment in China: The Informal Process , 1999 .

[18]  Willem Salet,et al.  Revival of strategic spatial planning , 2000 .

[19]  C. Ding.  Land policy reform in China: assessment and prospects , 2003 .

[20]  B. Redding,et al.  The Emergence of the Urban Land Market in China: Evolution, Structure, Constraints and Perspectives , 2002 .

[21]  Bob Jessop,et al.  The regulation approach, governance and post-Fordism: alternative perspectives on economic and political change? , 1995 .

[22]  J. Cole,et al.  The Socialist City: Spatial Structure and Urban Policy , 1981 .

[23]  Henning Nuissl,et al.  The ‘production’ of urban sprawl in eastern Germany as a phenomenon of post-socialist transformation , 2005 .

[24]  X. Zhang,et al.  Urban land reform in China , 1997 .

[25]  Willem Salet,et al.  Three approaches to strategic spatial planning , 2000 .

[26]  P. Healey.  Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies , 1997 .

[27]  A. Yeh,et al.  The New Land Development Process and Urban Development in Chinese Cities , 1996 .

[28]  Jianfa Shen.  Scale, state and the city: Urban transformation in post-reform China , 2007 .

[29]  John F. Kain,et al.  The Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis: Three Decades Later , 1992 .

[30]  Fulong Wu.  China's recent urban development in the process of land and housing marketisation and economic globalisation , 2001 .

[31]  Jieming Zhu,et al.  Local developmental state and order in China's urban development during transition , 2004 .

[32]  Bob Jessop,et al.  Capitalism and its future: remarks on regulation, government and governance , 1997 .

[33]  C. L. Choguill.  Crisis, Chaos, Crunch? Planning for Urban Growth in the Developing World , 1994 .

[34]  Robert J. Bennett,et al.  Local Government and the Changing Institutional Landscape of Economic Development in England and Wales , 2004 .

[35]  J. Kain.  Housing Segregation, Negro Employment, and Metropolitan Decentralization , 1968 .

[36]  Dali L. Yang.  Remaking the Chinese Leviathan: Market Transition and the Politics of Governance in China , 2004 .

[37]  A. Walder,et al.  Zouping in transition : the process of reform in rural North China , 2001 .

[38]  A. Walder,et al.  Property rights and economic reform in China , 2001 .

[39]  J. Pucher,et al.  Urban Transport Trends and Policies in China and India: Impacts of Rapid Economic Growth , 2007 .

[40]  S. McLafferty,et al.  SPATIAL MISMATCH AND EMPLOYMENT IN A DECADE OF RESTRUCTURING. , 1996 .

[41]  Laurence J. C. Ma,et al.  Economic reforms, urban spatial restructuring, and planning in China , 2004 .

[42]  Adrián Guillermo Aguilar,et al.  Peri-urbanization, illegal settlements and environmental impact in Mexico City , 2008 .

[43]  I. Brade,et al.  Moscow: Processes of restructuring in the post-Soviet metropolitan periphery , 2005 .

[44]  D. North.  Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[45]  Mike Jenks,et al.  Compact Cities : Sustainable Urban Forms for Developing Countries , 2000 .

[46]  Jieming Zhu,et al.  Local Growth Coalition: The Context and Implications of China's Gradualist Urban Land Reforms , 1999 .

[47]  R. Cervero.  Planned Communities, Self-containment and Commuting: A Cross-national Perspective , 1995 .

[48]  R. Stough,et al.  Institutions, Land Use and Transportation , 2004 .

[49]  P. Zhao,et al.  Conflicts in urban fringe in the transformation era: An examination of performance of the metropolitan growth management in Beijing , 2009 .

[50]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Theorising transition : the political economy of post-communist transformations , 1998 .

[51]  Michael Leaf,et al.  Inner city redevelopment in China , 1995 .

[52]  Jean C. Oi.  The evolution of local state corporatism , 1997 .

[53]  K M Gwilliam,et al.  SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT: PRIORITIES FOR POLICY REFORM , 1996 .

[54]  D. Levinson,et al.  Density and the Journey to Work , 1997, Growth and change.

[55]  M. Freire,et al.  The challenge of urban government policies and practices , 2001 .

[56]  Tingwei Zhang.  Land market forces and government's role in sprawl , 2000 .

[57]  O. Williamson.  The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead , 2000 .

[58]  R. Hudson.  Production, places and environment : changing perspectives in economic geography , 2000 .

[59]  K. Gwilliam,et al.  Urban transport in developing countries , 2003 .

[60]  G. Stoker.  Public-Private Partnerships and Urban Governance , 1998 .

[61]  Jean C. Oi.  Rural China Takes Off: Institutional Foundations of Economic Reform , 1999 .

[62]  T. R. Leinbach,et al.  Transport and Third World development: Review, issues, and prescription , 1995 .

[63]  C. Keng.  China's land disposition system , 1996 .

[64]  Cheng Fang,et al.  Emergence of urban poverty and inequality in China: evidence from household survey☆ , 2002 .

[65]  D. Rondinelli.  Asian urban development policies in the 1990s: From growth control to urban diffusion , 1991 .

[66]  Salah El-Shakhs,et al.  Megacity management in the Asian and Pacific region: Policy issues and innovative approaches , 1998 .

[67]  F. Stewart,et al.  Decentralisation in Indonesia , 1994 .

[68]  Chaolin Gu,et al.  Beijing's socio-spatial restructuring: Immigration and social transformation in the epoch of national economic reformation , 2006 .

[69]  Thomas F. Golob,et al.  A Simultaneous Model of Household Activity Participation and Trip Chain Generation , 1999 .

[70]  K. Tang.  Social development in China: progress and problems. , 1999, Journal of contemporary Asia.

[71]  Y. Wei.  DECENTRALIZATION, MARKETIZATION, AND GLOBALIZATION: THE TRIPLE PROCESSES UNDERLYING REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN CHINA , 2001 .

[72]  G. Chow.  China’s economic transformation , 2002, China’s 40 Years of Reform and Development: 1978–2018.

[73]  Qing Shen,et al.  Urban transportation in Shanghai, China: problems and planning implications , 1997 .

[74]  Fulong Wu,et al.  Socioeconomic transformations in Shanghai (1990–2000): Policy impacts in global–national–local contexts , 2006 .

[75]  W. Kombe.  Land use dynamics in peri-urban areas and their implications on the urban growth and form: the case of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania , 2005 .