Effects of interceptive orthodontics on orbicular muscle activity: a surface electromyographic study in children.

The purpose of this study was to assess by surface electromyography (sEMG) the changes in upper and lower orbicular oris (OO) muscles produced by a preformed functional device in subjects with Class II, division 1 malocclusion, deep bite, and labial incompetence. Twenty-eight subjects were selected: 13 subjects (mean age 9 ± 1.5 years) with Class II malocclusion, deep bite, and labial incompetence were treated with a preformed functional device, while 15 subjects (mean age 9.5 ± 0.8 years) with normal occlusion were used as control. Inclusion criteria for both groups were: presence of mixed dentition, no previous orthodontic treatment, and absence of speech disturbance. sEMG recordings were taken at the time of the first visit (T0), and after 3 (T1) and 6 months (T2) for the treated group, and at T0 and T2 for the control group. The sEMG recording was performed at rest, and while kissing, swallowing, opening the mouth, clenching the teeth, and during protrusion of the mandible, by placing electrodes at the area of muscle contraction. At T0, except during swallowing, the treated group always showed a lower sEMG activity of the lower OO muscle with respect to the control group, with significant differences at rest and during mandibular protrusion (p<0.05). In the treated group, a significant increase in muscle tone was observed for the lower OO muscle from T0 to T1, but only at rest. The upper OO muscle showed a significant increase during the protrusion of the mandible from T1 to T2. No significant change was observed in the control group during the follow-up. Muscular contractility of treated patients at T2 reached the same values as that of the control group at T2. Interceptive orthodontics seems to improve the form and function of the orofacial muscle structure. Improvement in muscle contraction after treatment was demonstrated by sEMG.

[1]  L. V. Christensen,et al.  Methodological observations on positive and negative work (teeth grinding) by human jaw muscles. , 1992, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[2]  Coenraad F. A. Moorrees,et al.  Natural head position, a basic consideration in the interpretation of cephalometric radiographs , 1958 .

[3]  A. Lowe,et al.  Associations between anterior temporal, masseter, and orbicularis oris muscle activity and craniofacial morphology in children. , 1984, American journal of orthodontics.

[4]  H. Ioi,et al.  Frequency spectrum of condylar movement in clinically normal subjects, using an amorphous sensor. , 2004, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation.

[5]  A. Čelebić,et al.  Natural head position and inclination of craniofacial planes. , 2006, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[6]  A. Militi,et al.  Myotonic dystrophy and craniofacial morphology: clinical and instrumental study. , 2009, European journal of paediatric dentistry.

[7]  A. Gross,et al.  Myofunctional and dentofacial relationships in second grade children. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[8]  S. Tecco,et al.  An electromyographic evaluation of bilateral symmetry of masticatory, neck and trunk muscles activity in patients wearing a positioner. , 2008, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[9]  G. Kundt,et al.  Relationship between occlusal findings and orofacial myofunctional status in primary and mixed dentition , 2011, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[10]  Winfried Harzer,et al.  Prevalence of malocclusions in the early mixed dentition and orthodontic treatment need. , 2004, European journal of orthodontics.

[11]  G. Kundt,et al.  Interrelation between Occlusal Findings and Orofacial Myofunctional Status in Primary and Mixed Dentition , 2007, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[12]  G. Kundt,et al.  Relationship between Occlusal Findings and Orofacial Myofunctional Status in Primary and Mixed Dentition , 2007, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[13]  J. Cram,et al.  Introduction to Surface Electromyography , 1998 .

[14]  G. Perinetti,et al.  Posturography as a diagnostic aid in dentistry: a systematic review. , 2009, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[15]  M L Moss,et al.  The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 3. The genomic thesis. , 1997, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[16]  Carlo J. De Luca,et al.  The Use of Surface Electromyography in Biomechanics , 1997 .

[17]  V. Ferrario,et al.  The influence of occlusion on jaw and neck muscle activity: a surface EMG study in healthy young adults. , 2006, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[18]  G. La Torre,et al.  Orthodontic treatment need in the Italian child population. , 2008, European journal of paediatric dentistry.

[19]  M. Moss,et al.  The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 4. The epigenetic antithesis and the resolving synthesis. , 1997, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[20]  Grant C Townsend,et al.  Craniofacial reference plane variation and natural head position. , 2008, European journal of orthodontics.

[21]  L. V. Christensen Experimental teeth clenching in man. , 1989, Swedish dental journal. Supplement.

[22]  C F Moorrees,et al.  Natural head position--a revival. , 1994, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[23]  D. Farina,et al.  Surface electromyography in the assessment of jaw elevator muscles. , 2008, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[24]  P. Schopf Indication for and Frequency of Early Orthodontic Therapy or Interceptive Measures , 2003, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.