Looking at protocol efficiency from a new angle: stability—delay analysis

Path stability is a very critical issue in resource-constrained environments as frequent route discoveries can easily congest the network and also unnecessarily exhaust the battery power of nodes. We quantify path stability in terms of the number of route transitions a routing protocol incurs to continue the data exchange between a particular source-destination (s-t) pair. End-to-end delay of an s-t session is another equally important performance metric, particularly for real-time applications. Aiming for optimum end-to-end delay can lead to unnecessary route transitions and vice-versa. In this paper, we introduce the idea of Stability-Delay Tradeoff (SDT) - as a measure of the efficiency of a MANET routing protocol. In a two-dimensional space of stability and delay, SDT refers to the proximity of the routing protocol's actual stability and delay with respect to the optimal stability and delay under the same history of network topology changes. We show that the theoretical optimum for path stability i.e., the number of route transitions is efficiently computable in polynomial time. We also propose a (distance, weight)-based assessment technique to quantify the SDT of a routing protocol.

[1]  Satish K. Tripathi,et al.  Signal stability-based adaptive routing (SSA) for ad hoc mobile networks , 1997, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[2]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Performance comparison of two on-demand routing protocols for ad hoc networks , 2001, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[3]  ANDRÁS FARAGÓ,et al.  MERIT: A Scalable Approach for Protocol Assessment , 2003, Mob. Networks Appl..

[4]  Samir Ranjan Das,et al.  Simulation‐based performance evaluation of routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks , 2000, Mob. Networks Appl..

[5]  Nj Piscataway,et al.  Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications , 1996 .

[6]  M. S. Corson,et al.  A highly adaptive distributed routing algorithm for mobile wireless networks , 1997, Proceedings of INFOCOM '97.

[7]  Hyunsoo Yoon,et al.  Link stability and route lifetime in ad-hoc wireless networks , 2002, Proceedings. International Conference on Parallel Processing Workshop.

[8]  David A. Maltz,et al.  A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols , 1998, MobiCom '98.

[9]  Voon Chin Phua,et al.  Wireless lan medium access control (mac) and physical layer (phy) specifications , 1999 .

[10]  David A. Maltz,et al.  DSR: the dynamic source routing protocol for multihop wireless ad hoc networks , 2001 .

[11]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing , 1999, Proceedings WMCSA'99. Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications.

[12]  Chai-Keong Toh,et al.  Associativity-Based Routing for Ad Hoc Mobile Networks , 1997, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[13]  Peter Martini,et al.  Strategies for finding stable paths in mobile wireless ad hoc networks , 2003, 28th Annual IEEE International Conference on Local Computer Networks, 2003. LCN '03. Proceedings..

[14]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Performance comparison of two on-demand routing protocols for ad hoc networks , 2001, IEEE Wirel. Commun..