Trends in atmospheric methane concentrations since 1990 were driven and modified by anthropogenic emissions
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Parker,et al. Atmospheric data support a multi-decadal shift in the global methane budget towards natural tropical emissions , 2023, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
[2] P. Ciais,et al. Recent intensification of wetland methane feedback , 2023, Nature Climate Change.
[3] P. Ciais,et al. Wetland emission and atmospheric sink changes explain methane growth in 2020. , 2022, Nature.
[4] D. Stevenson,et al. COVID-19 lockdown emission reductions have the potential to explain over half of the coincident increase in global atmospheric methane , 2022, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
[5] S. Michel,et al. Improved global wetland carbon isotopic signatures support post-2006 microbial methane emission increase , 2022, Communications Earth & Environment.
[6] G. Balsamo,et al. Quantification of methane emissions from hotspots and during COVID-19 using a global atmospheric inversion , 2022, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
[7] J. Christensen,et al. Model evaluation of short-lived climate forcers for the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme: a multi-species, multi-model study , 2021, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
[8] William F. Lamb,et al. A comprehensive and synthetic dataset for global, regional, and national greenhouse gas emissions by sector 1970–2018 with an extension to 2019 , 2021, Earth System Science Data.
[9] Dylan B. A. Jones,et al. Societal shifts due to COVID-19 reveal large-scale complexities and feedbacks between atmospheric chemistry and climate change , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[10] Luana S. Basso,et al. Large and increasing methane emissions from eastern Amazonia derived from satellite data, 2010–2018 , 2021, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
[11] P. Forster,et al. Modifying emissions scenario projections to account for the effects of COVID-19: protocol for CovidMIP , 2021, Geoscientific Model Development.
[12] C. Prigent,et al. Development of the global dataset of Wetland Area and Dynamics for Methane Modeling (WAD2M) , 2021, Earth System Science Data.
[13] G. Janssens‑Maenhout,et al. Uncertainties in the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR) emission inventory of greenhouse gases , 2021 .
[14] T. Borsdorff,et al. Rain-fed pulses of methane from East Africa during 2018–2019 contributed to atmospheric growth rate , 2021, Environmental Research Letters.
[15] J. Sheng,et al. Attribution of the accelerating increase in atmospheric methane during 2010–2018 by inverse analysis of GOSAT observations , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
[16] M. Rigby,et al. Atmospheric-methane source and sink sensitivity analysis using Gaussian process emulation , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
[17] Christopher J. Smith,et al. Current and future global climate impacts resulting from COVID-19 , 2020, Nature Climate Change.
[18] J. Canadell,et al. Increasing anthropogenic methane emissions arise equally from agricultural and fossil fuel sources , 2020, Environmental Research Letters.
[19] P. Ciais,et al. Accelerating methane growth rate from 2010 to 2017: leading contributions from the tropics and East Asia , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
[20] R. Martin,et al. A global anthropogenic emission inventory of atmospheric pollutants from sector- and fuel-specific sources (1970–2017): an application of the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS) , 2020, Earth System Science Data.
[21] J. Canadell,et al. On the role of trend and variability in the hydroxyl radical (OH) in the global methane budget , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
[22] Z. Klimont,et al. Technical potentials and costs for reducing global anthropogenic methane emissions in the 2050 timeframe –results from the GAINS model , 2020, Environmental Research Communications.
[23] L. Horowitz,et al. Trends in global tropospheric hydroxyl radical and methane lifetime since 1850 from AerChemMIP , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
[24] R. Gautam,et al. Satellite observations reveal extreme methane leakage from a natural gas well blowout , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[25] Anonymous. Review of “Investigation of the global methane budget over 1980-2017 using GFDL-AM4.1” , 2019 .
[26] C. Taylor,et al. An increase in methane emissions from tropical Africa between 2010 and 2016 inferred from satellite data , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
[27] H. Schaefer,et al. Rising methane: A new climate challenge , 2019, Science.
[28] J. Canadell,et al. Inter-model comparison of global hydroxyl radical (OH) distributions and their impact on atmospheric methane over the 2000–2016 period , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
[29] D. Jacob,et al. The role of chlorine in global tropospheric chemistry , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
[30] E. Kort,et al. Interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[31] K. Calvin,et al. Global emissions pathways under different socioeconomic scenarios for use in CMIP6: a dataset of harmonized emissions trajectories through the end of the century , 2018, Geoscientific Model Development.
[32] R. Skeie,et al. Concentrations and radiative forcing of anthropogenic aerosols from 1750 to 2014 simulated with the Oslo CTM3 and CEDS emission inventory , 2018, Geoscientific Model Development.
[33] Hartmut Boesch,et al. Evaluating year-to-year anomalies in tropical wetland methane emissions using satellite CH4 observations , 2018, Remote Sensing of Environment.
[34] P. Cox,et al. Increased importance of methane reduction for a 1.5 degree target , 2018 .
[35] V. Brovkin,et al. Global wetland contribution to 2000–2012 atmospheric methane growth rate dynamics , 2017 .
[36] J. Randerson,et al. Global fire emissions estimates during 1997–2016 , 2017 .
[37] Johannes W. Kaiser,et al. Historic global biomass burning emissions for CMIP6 (BB4CMIP) based on merging satellite observations with proxies and fire models (1750-2015) , 2017 .
[38] G. Etiope,et al. Global Inventory of Gas Geochemistry Data from Fossil Fuel, Microbial and Burning Sources, version 2017 , 2017 .
[39] Jens Mühle,et al. Role of atmospheric oxidation in recent methane growth , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[40] Christian Frankenberg,et al. Ambiguity in the causes for decadal trends in atmospheric methane and hydroxyl , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[41] Meng Li,et al. Historical (1750–2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS) , 2017 .
[42] V. Arora,et al. An assessment of natural methane fluxes simulated by the CLASS-CTEM model , 2017, Biogeosciences.
[43] Andrea Stenke,et al. Review of the global models used within phase 1 of the Chemistry–Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) , 2017 .
[44] Stefan Reimann,et al. Historical greenhouse gas concentrations for climate modelling (CMIP6) , 2016 .
[45] J. Lamarque,et al. AerChemMIP: quantifying the effects of chemistry and aerosols in CMIP6 , 2016 .
[46] V. Brovkin,et al. The Global Methane Budget 2000–2017 , 2016, Earth System Science Data.
[47] S. Michel,et al. A 21st-century shift from fossil-fuel to biogenic methane emissions indicated by 13CH4 , 2016, Science.
[48] N. Mahowald,et al. Attribution of changes in global wetland methane emissions from pre-industrial to present using CLM4.5-BGC , 2016 .
[49] Ray F. Weiss,et al. Atmospheric methane evolution the last 40 years , 2015 .
[50] Christine A. Shoemaker,et al. CH 4 parameter estimation in CLM4.5bgc using surrogate global optimization , 2015 .
[51] R. Weiss,et al. Role of OH variability in the stalling of the global atmospheric CH4 growth rate from 1999 to 2006 , 2015 .
[52] J. Lamarque,et al. Preindustrial to present-day changes in tropospheric hydroxyl radical and methane lifetime from the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP) , 2012 .
[53] T. Berntsen,et al. The chemical transport model Oslo CTM3 , 2012 .
[54] J. Lamarque,et al. Tropospheric ozone changes, radiative forcing and attribution to emissions in the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP) , 2012 .
[55] N. Nakicenovic,et al. RCP 8.5—A scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions , 2011 .
[56] A. Thomson,et al. The representative concentration pathways: an overview , 2011 .
[57] W. J. Riley,et al. Barriers to predicting changes in global terrestrial methane fluxes: analyses using CLM4Me, a methane biogeochemistry model integrated in CESM , 2011 .
[58] Peter G. Hess,et al. Sensitivity of wetland methane emissions to model assumptions: application and model testing against site observations , 2011 .
[59] P. Jöckel,et al. Small Interannual Variability of Global Atmospheric Hydroxyl , 2011, Science.
[60] David S. Lee,et al. Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of reactive gases and aerosols: methodology and application , 2010 .
[61] P. M. Lang,et al. Observational constraints on recent increases in the atmospheric CH4 burden , 2009 .
[62] P. Ciais,et al. Two decades of OH variability as inferred by an inversion of atmospheric transport and chemistry of methyl chloroform , 2005 .
[63] P. Crill,et al. 13C12C Fractionation of methane during oxidation in a temperate forested soil , 1994 .
[64] J. S. Bisht,et al. Emissions from the Oil and Gas Sectors, Coal Mining and Ruminant Farming Drive Methane Growth over the Past Three Decades , 2021, Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II.
[65] OUP accepted manuscript , 2021, National Science Review.
[66] M. Strubegger,et al. The marker quantification of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2: A middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21st century , 2017 .