Role of multiple, adjustable toes in distributed control shown by sideways wall-running in geckos

Remarkable progress has been made characterizing one of nature's most integrated, hierarchical structures––the fibrillar adhesive system of geckos. Nonetheless, we lack an understanding of how multiple toes coordinate to facilitate geckos' acrobatic locomotion. Here, we tested the control function of gecko toes by running them on vertical substrates varying in orientation, friction and roughness. Sideways wall-running geckos realigned the toes of their top feet upward to resist gravity. Toe contact area was not compromised, but redistributed. Geckos aligned all toes upward to resist slipping when encountering low-friction patches during sideways wall-running. Negotiation of intermittent slippery strips showed an increased contribution of particular toes to compensate for toes that lost adhesion. Increasing substrate roughness using discrete rods perpendicular to sideways locomotion resulted in geckos bending and/or rotating toes to conform to and even grasp the rods, with potential forces more than five times body weight. Geckos increase their effectiveness of manoeuvrability in demanding environments by taking advantage of the distributed control afforded by multiple toes. Our findings provide insight on biological attachment and offer inspiration to advance gecko-inspired robotics and other biomimetic applications.

[1]  M. Cutkosky,et al.  Frictional adhesion: a new angle on gecko attachment , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[2]  Wojciech Matusik,et al.  Learning the signatures of the human grasp using a scalable tactile glove , 2019, Nature.

[3]  E. Pianka,et al.  Integrative biology of sticky feet in geckos. , 2005, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[4]  Wei Li,et al.  How do the substrate reaction forces acting on a gecko’s limbs respond to inclines? , 2015, The Science of Nature.

[5]  R. Full,et al.  Differential leg function in a sprawled-posture quadrupedal trotter , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[6]  Aaron Parness,et al.  Rate-dependent frictional adhesion in natural and synthetic gecko setae , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[7]  R. Full,et al.  Active tails enhance arboreal acrobatics in geckos , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Bieke Vanhooydonck,et al.  Whole-organism studies of adhesion in pad-bearing lizards: creative evolutionary solutions to functional problems , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[9]  R J Full,et al.  Distributed mechanical feedback in arthropods and robots simplifies control of rapid running on challenging terrain , 2007, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[10]  Kellar Autumn,et al.  Properties, Principles, and Parameters of the Gecko Adhesive System , 2006 .

[11]  Martin S Fischer,et al.  Biodynamics of climbing: effects of substrate orientation on the locomotion of a highly arboreal lizard (Chamaeleo calyptratus) , 2013, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[12]  R. Full,et al.  Dynamics of geckos running vertically , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[13]  Thomas Speck,et al.  The ecomechanics of gecko adhesion: natural surface topography, evolution, and biomimetics. , 2019, Integrative and comparative biology.

[14]  Robert N. Fisher,et al.  A comparative analysis of clinging ability among pad‐bearing lizards , 1996 .

[15]  T. Higham,et al.  Attachment beyond the adhesive system: the contribution of claws in gecko clinging and locomotion. , 2019, Integrative and comparative biology.

[16]  Taylor Cl,et al.  The anatomy and mechanics of the human hand. , 1955, Artificial limbs.

[17]  Zhendong Dai,et al.  Behavior and dynamics of gecko’s locomotion: The effects of moving directions on a vertical surface , 2011 .

[18]  A. Russell,et al.  The aponeuroses of the lacertilian ankle , 1993, Journal of morphology.

[19]  Austin M. Garner,et al.  A physical model approach to gecko adhesion opportunity and constraint: How rough could it be? , 2019, Integrative and comparative biology.

[20]  A. Russell,et al.  Real-world challenges to, and capabilities of, the gekkotan adhesive system: contrasting the rough and the smooth , 2007 .

[21]  S. Gorb,et al.  The synergy between the insect-inspired claws and adhesive pads increases the attachment ability on various rough surfaces , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[22]  Metin Sitti,et al.  Morphological intelligence counters foot slipping in the desert locust and dynamic robots , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Kellar Autumn,et al.  Ultrahydrophobicity indicates a non-adhesive default state in gecko setae , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[24]  Yu Tian,et al.  Peel-Zone Model of Tape Peeling Based on the Gecko Adhesive System , 2007 .

[25]  Sangbae Kim,et al.  SpinybotII: climbing hard walls with compliant microspines , 2005, ICAR '05. Proceedings., 12th International Conference on Advanced Robotics, 2005..

[26]  S. Gorb Attachment Devices of Insect Cuticle , 2001, Springer Netherlands.

[27]  Lei Ren,et al.  Biomechanics of gecko locomotion: the patterns of reaction forces on inverted, vertical and horizontal substrates , 2015, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[28]  A. Bauer,et al.  Morphological correlates of the secondarily symmetrical pes of gekkotan lizards , 1997 .

[29]  Aleksandra V. Birn-Jeffery,et al.  Geckos significantly alter foot orientation to facilitate adhesion during downhill locomotion , 2014, Biology Letters.

[30]  A. Russell,et al.  The morphological basis of weight-bearing in the scansors of the tokay gecko (Reptilia: Sauria) , 1986 .

[31]  Huajian Gao,et al.  Mechanics of hierarchical adhesion structures of geckos , 2005 .

[32]  Kevin Shiuan,et al.  Gecko toe and lamellar shear adhesion on macroscopic, engineered rough surfaces , 2014, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[33]  Mark R. Cutkosky,et al.  Whole body adhesion: hierarchical, directional and distributed control of adhesive forces for a climbing robot , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[34]  Timothy E Higham,et al.  A new angle on clinging in geckos: incline, not substrate, triggers the deployment of the adhesive system , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  A. Russell,et al.  Limb and digit orientation during vertical clinging in Bibron's gecko, Chondrodactylus bibronii (A. Smith, 1846) and its bearing on the adhesive capabilities of geckos , 2016 .

[36]  Bieke Vanhooydonck,et al.  Effects of substrate structure on speed and acceleration capacity in climbing geckos , 2005 .

[37]  M. Cutkosky,et al.  Stress distribution and contact area measurements of a gecko toe using a high-resolution tactile sensor , 2015, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[38]  A. Russell Integrative Functional Morphology of the Gekkotan Adhesive System (Reptilia: Gekkota)1 , 2002, Integrative and comparative biology.

[39]  Yu Tian,et al.  Adhesion and friction in gecko toe attachment and detachment , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  A. Crosby,et al.  Effects of Digit Orientation on Gecko Adhesive Force Capacity: Synthetic and Behavioral Studies. , 2019, Integrative and comparative biology.

[41]  Naoe Hosoda,et al.  Influence of surface roughness on gecko adhesion. , 2007, Acta biomaterialia.

[42]  Anthony P Russell,et al.  The Integrative Biology of Gecko Adhesion: Historical Review, Current Understanding, and Grand Challenges. , 2019, Integrative and comparative biology.

[43]  Martin S Fischer,et al.  Arboreal locomotion in rats – the challenge of maintaining stability , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[44]  A. Russell A contribution to the functional analysis of the foot of the Tokay, Gekko gecko (Reptilia: Gekkonidae) , 1975 .