Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: expanding the paradigm.

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is the leading cause of death for patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) who reach the hospital alive. Its incidence has remained constant for 20 years.1,2 Rapidly re-establishing infarct-related artery (IRA) blood flow is essential in the management of patients with shock due to right ventricular or left ventricular (LV) failure. A strategy of early revascularization is superior to initial aggressive medical therapy.3–5 Despite the advantages of early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), once shock is diagnosed, the mortality rate remains high (≈50%) despite intervention, and half of the deaths occur within the first 48 hours.6–8 This may be caused by irreversible extensive myocardial or vital-organ damage. New evidence suggests, however, that a systemic inflammatory response, complement activation, release of inflammatory cytokines, expression of inducible nitric oxide (NO) synthase (iNOS), and inappropriate vasodilation may play an important role not only in the genesis of shock but also in outcome after shock. New insights and therapies are needed. The underlying pathophysiology of CS is profound depression of myocardial contractility, resulting in a vicious spiral of reduced cardiac output (CO), low blood pressure, further coronary insufficiency, and further reduction in contractility and CO. The classic paradigm predicts that compensatory systemic vasoconstriction with high systemic vascular resistance (SVR) should occur in response to the depression of CO (Figure 1).9 Figure 1. Classic shock paradigm, as illustrated by S. Hollenberg, is shown in black. The influence of the inflammatory response syndrome initiated by a large MI is illustrated in red. LVEDP indicates left ventricular end-diastolic pressure. Reprinted with permission from Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine .9 Autopsy studies have shown that the pathological basis of CS is extensive MI. Varying pathological stages of infarction confirm the stuttering and progressive …

[1]  Z. Vered,et al.  L-NMMA (a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor) is effective in the treatment of cardiogenic shock. , 2000, Circulation.

[2]  J. Boura,et al.  Clinical predictors of in-hospital death in patients with cardiogenic shock selected to undergo early revascularization , 2002 .

[3]  T. Böhm,et al.  Enhanced inflammatory response to coronary angioplasty in patients with severe unstable angina. , 1999, Circulation.

[4]  M. Sabatine,et al.  Relationship between baseline white blood cell count and degree of coronary artery disease and mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes , 2002 .

[5]  H. White,et al.  Cardiogenic shock caused by right ventricular infarction: a report from the SHOCK registry. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  L. Sleeper,et al.  509 Hemodynamic parameters in cardiogenic shock due to myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK trial registry , 2003 .

[7]  G. Rocker,et al.  The Systemic Inflammatory Response to Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Pathophysiological, Therapeutic, and Pharmacological Considerations , 1997, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[8]  H. White,et al.  Acute myocardial infarction complicated by systemic hypoperfusion without hypotension: report of the SHOCK trial registry. , 2000, The American journal of medicine.

[9]  L. Sleeper,et al.  Early revascularization is associated with improved survival in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. , 2003, European heart journal.

[10]  Z. Vered,et al.  Acute heart failure: a novel approach to its pathogenesis and treatment , 2002, European journal of heart failure.

[11]  L. Hue,et al.  Protection against ischemic injury by nonvasoactive concentrations of nitric oxide synthase inhibitors in the perfused rabbit heart. , 1995, Circulation.

[12]  James B. Mitchell,et al.  Nitric oxide protects against cellular damage and cytotoxicity from reactive oxygen species. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  R. Califf,et al.  1999 update: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  D. Bers,et al.  Expression of Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Depresses &bgr;-Adrenergic–Stimulated Calcium Release From the Sarcoplasmic Reticulum in Intact Ventricular Myocytes , 2001, Circulation.

[15]  Zvi Vered,et al.  The role of cardiac power and systemic vascular resistance in the pathophysiology and diagnosis of patients with acute congestive heart failure , 2003, European journal of heart failure.

[16]  M. Picard,et al.  Congenital Deficiency of Nitric Oxide Synthase 2 Protects Against Endotoxin-Induced Myocardial Dysfunction in Mice , 2000, Circulation.

[17]  H. Drexler,et al.  Carvedilol prospective randomized cumulative survival (COPERNICUS) trial: carvedilol as the sun and center of the beta-blocker world? , 2002, Circulation.

[18]  F. Neumann,et al.  Cardiac release of cytokines and inflammatory responses in acute myocardial infarction. , 1995, Circulation.

[19]  L. Sleeper,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock in the SHOCK Trial Registry. , 2001, American heart journal.

[20]  R. Schulz,et al.  Inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis protects the isolated working rabbit heart from ischaemia-reperfusion injury. , 1995, Cardiovascular research.

[21]  U. Förstermann,et al.  Nitric oxide in the pathogenesis of vascular disease , 2000, The Journal of pathology.

[22]  M. Sabatine,et al.  Relationship between baseline white blood cell count and degree of coronary artery disease and mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes ☆: A TACTICS-TIMI 18 substudy , 2003 .

[23]  H. White,et al.  Echocardiographic Predictors of Survival and Response to Early Revascularization in Cardiogenic Shock , 2003, Circulation.

[24]  H. White,et al.  One-year survival following early revascularization for cardiogenic shock. , 2001, JAMA.

[25]  Douglas L. Jones,et al.  Mortality After Myocardial Infarction in Mice , 2022 .

[26]  J. Bigby Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine , 1988 .

[27]  Z. Vered,et al.  LINCS: L-NAME (a NO synthase inhibitor) in the treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock: a prospective randomized study. , 2003, European heart journal.

[28]  D. Sawyer,et al.  Mice Lacking Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Have Improved Left Ventricular Contractile Function and Reduced Apoptotic Cell Death Late After Myocardial Infarction , 2001, Circulation research.

[29]  Richard P. Lewis,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  J. Gurwitz,et al.  Temporal trends in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  H. White,et al.  Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction--etiologies, management and outcome: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK? , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[32]  P. Armstrong,et al.  Pexelizumab, an Anti-C5 Complement Antibody, as Adjunctive Therapy to Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction: The COMplement inhibition in Myocardial infarction treated with Angioplasty (COMMA) Trial , 2003, Circulation.

[33]  G. Lamas,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients wi , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[34]  J. Alpert,et al.  Cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction: Incidence and Mortality from a Community-Wide Perspective, 1975 to 1988 , 1991 .

[35]  H. Dargie,et al.  Effect of carvedilol on outcome after myocardial infarction in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction: the CAPRICORN randomised trial , 2001, The Lancet.

[36]  H. S,et al.  Early Revascularization in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock , 2000 .

[37]  T. Killip,et al.  Pathophysiology of Cardiogenic Shock: Quantification of Myocardial Necrosis, Clinical, Pathologic and Electrocardiographic Correlations , 1973, Circulation.

[38]  S. Williams,et al.  Peak exercise cardiac power output; a direct indicator of cardiac function strongly predictive of prognosis in chronic heart failure. , 2001, European heart journal.

[39]  R. Bing,et al.  Involvement of inducible nitric oxide synthase in the inflammatory process of myocardial infarction. , 1995, International journal of cardiology.

[40]  B. Freeman,et al.  Nitric oxide regulation of tissue free radical injury. , 1996, Chemical research in toxicology.