Remote monitoring of vigilance behavior in large herbivores using acceleration data

BackgroundBiotelemetry offers an increasing set of tools to monitor animals. Acceleration sensors in particular can provide remote observations of animal behavior at high temporal resolution. While recent studies have demonstrated the capability of this technique for a wide range of species and behaviors, a coherent methodology is still missing (1) for behavior monitoring of large herbivores that are usually tagged with neck collars and frequently switch between diverse behaviors and (2) for monitoring of vigilance behavior. Here, we present an approach that aims at remotely monitoring different types of large herbivore behavior including vigilance with acceleration data.MethodsWe pioneered this approach with field observations of eight collared roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). First, we trained a classification model for distinguishing seven structural behavior categories: lying, standing, browsing, walking, trotting, galloping and ‘others’. Second, we developed a model that predicted the internal states, active and resting, based on the predicted sequence of structural behaviors and expert-based rules. Further, we applied both models to automatically monitor vigilance behavior and compared model predictions with expert judgment of vigilance behavior. To exemplify the practical application of this approach, we predicted behavior, internal state and vigilance continuously for a collared roe deer.ResultsThe structural behaviors were predicted with high accuracy (overall cross-validated accuracy 71%). Only behaviors that are similar in terms of posture and dynamic body movements were prone to misclassification. Active and resting states showed clear distinction and could be utilized as behavioral context for the detection of vigilance behavior. Here, model predictions were characterized by excellent consistency with expert judgment of vigilance behavior (mean accuracy 96%).ConclusionIn this study, we demonstrated the strong potential and practical applicability of acceleration data for continuous, high-resolution behavior monitoring of large herbivores and showed that vigilance behavior is well detectable. In particular, when combined with spatial data, automated behavior recognition will enrich many fields in behavioral ecology by providing extensive access to behaviors of animals in the wild.

[1]  Andrew E. Myers,et al.  Derivation of body motion via appropriate smoothing of acceleration data , 2008 .

[2]  E. V. van Loon,et al.  From Sensor Data to Animal Behaviour: An Oystercatcher Example , 2012, PloS one.

[3]  Roland Kays,et al.  Observing the unwatchable through acceleration logging of animal behavior , 2013, Animal Biotelemetry.

[4]  Eliezer Gurarie,et al.  What is the animal doing? Tools for exploring behavioural structure in animal movements. , 2016, The Journal of animal ecology.

[5]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Back to the basics of antipredatory vigilance: can nonvigilant animals detect attack? , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  S. Aulagnier,et al.  Hunting increases vigilance levels in roe deer and modifies feeding site selection , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  M. Childress,et al.  Predation risk, gender and the group size effect: does elk vigilance depend upon the behaviour of conspecifics? , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  M. Boyce,et al.  Foraging costs of vigilance in large mammalian herbivores , 2004 .

[9]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  The Ecology of Fear: Optimal Foraging, Game Theory, and Trophic Interactions , 1999 .

[10]  Thomas Ruf,et al.  A versatile telemetry system for continuous measurement of heart rate, body temperature and locomotor activity in free‐ranging ruminants , 2010, Methods in ecology and evolution.

[11]  Paul S. Martin,et al.  Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide , 1986 .

[12]  E. Revilla,et al.  A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Christopher N. Templeton.  Antipredator Defenses in Birds and Mammals.Interspecific Interactions.ByTim Caro;drawings by, Sheila Girling.Chicago (Illinois): University of Chicago Press.$95.00 (hardcover); $38.00 (paper). xvi + 591 p; ill.; prey species index and subject index. ISBN: 0‐226‐09435‐9 (hc); 0‐226‐09436‐7 (pb). 2005 , 2006 .

[14]  S. Wanless,et al.  Can Ethograms Be Automatically Generated Using Body Acceleration Data from Free-Ranging Birds? , 2009, PloS one.

[15]  2012 Ninth International Conference on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks, London, United Kingdom, May 9-12, 2012 , 2012, BSN.

[16]  Ran Nathan,et al.  Using tri-axial acceleration data to identify behavioral modes of free-ranging animals: general concepts and tools illustrated for griffon vultures , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[17]  J. Swenson,et al.  An Individual-Based Method to Measure Animal Activity Levels: A Test on Brown Bears , 2006 .

[18]  B. Ripley,et al.  Recursive Partitioning and Regression Trees , 2015 .

[19]  M. Heurich,et al.  New Possibilities of Observing Animal Behaviour from a Distance Using Activity Sensors in Gps-Collars: An Attempt to Calibrate Remotely Collected Activity Data with Direct Behavioural Observations in Red Deer Cervus elaphus , 2009 .

[20]  Subir Biswas,et al.  Remote Activity Classification of Hens Using Wireless Body Mounted Sensors , 2012, 2012 Ninth International Conference on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks.

[21]  H. Hofer,et al.  Behavioural Responses of European Roe Deer to Temporal Variation in Predation Risk , 2013 .

[22]  B. Cargnelutti,et al.  Use of GPS activity sensors to measure active and inactive behaviours of European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) , 2010 .

[23]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[24]  E. Shepard.  Identification of animal movement patterns using tri-axial accelerometry , 2008 .

[25]  Yuzhi Cai,et al.  Wild state secrets: ultra‐sensitive measurement of micro‐movement can reveal internal processes in animals , 2014 .

[26]  Vilis O Nams,et al.  Combining animal movements and behavioural data to detect behavioural states. , 2014, Ecology letters.

[27]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Temporal Variation in Danger Drives Antipredator Behavior: The Predation Risk Allocation Hypothesis , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[28]  Hawthorne L. Beyer,et al.  The pitfalls of ignoring behaviour when quantifying habitat selection , 2014 .

[29]  Rory P. Wilson,et al.  Prying into the intimate details of animal lives: use of a daily diary on animals , 2008 .

[30]  Navinder J. Singh,et al.  Toward a mechanistic understanding of animal migration: incorporating physiological measurements in the study of animal movement , 2015, Conservation physiology.

[31]  Yasuhiko Naito,et al.  A new technique for monitoring the detailed behaviour of terrestrial animals: A case study with the domestic cat , 2005 .

[32]  S. Ciuti,et al.  Effects of hunting with hounds on a non-target species living on the edge of a protected area , 2011 .

[33]  Wolfgang Heidrich,et al.  Accelerometer-informed GPS telemetry : Reducing the trade-off between resolution and longevity , 2012 .

[34]  P. Bednekoff.  Animal Vigilance: Monitoring Predators and Competitors. By Guy Beauchamp. Academic Press. Amsterdam (The Netherlands) and Boston (Massachusetts): Elsevier. $49.95 (paper). xii + 254 p.; ill.; subject index. ISBN: 978-0-12-801983-2. 2015. , 2017 .

[35]  Michael Scantlebury,et al.  Tri-axial accelerometers quantify behaviour in the Eurasian badger (Meles meles): towards an automated interpretation of field data , 2014, Animal Biotelemetry.

[36]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus , 1990 .

[37]  Håkan Sand,et al.  Building a mechanistic understanding of predation with GPS-based movement data , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  F. Cagnacci,et al.  Animal ecology meets GPS-based radiotelemetry: a perfect storm of opportunities and challenges , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.