Potentials and limitations of using large-scale forest inventory data for evaluating forest succession models

Abstract Forest gap models have been applied widely to examine forest development under natural conditions and to investigate the effect of climate change on forest succession. Due to the complexity and parameter requirements of such models a rigorous evaluation is required to build confidence in the simulation results. However, appropriate data for model assessment are scarce at the large spatial and temporal scales of successional dynamics. In this study, we explore a data source for the evaluation of forest gap models that has been used only little in the past, i.e., large-scale National Forest Inventory data. The key objectives of this study were (a) to examine the potentials and limitations of using large-scale forest inventory data for evaluating the performance of forest gap models and (b) to test two particular models as case studies to derive recommendations for their future improvement. We used data from the first Swiss National Forest Inventory to examine the species basal area and tree numbers in different diameter classes simulated by the gap models F or C lim (version 2.9.3) and PICUS (version 1.4) for forest types that are typical of mountain forests in Switzerland. The results showed the potential of data from large-scale forest inventories for evaluating model performance. Since this type of data is typically based on a large number of samples across environmental gradients, they are particularly suited for investigations at the general level of the dominant species based on stand basal area. However, the surprisingly small variability of juvenile trees (trees The examined models reproduced the observed species composition satisfactorily. However, there were clear model deficiencies in the simulation of successional patterns and of juvenile tree numbers. We identified priorities for future model development. We conclude that large-scale forest inventory data can be valuable for model evaluation, particularly when they cover large environmental gradients and do not come from intensively managed forests. Due to their limitations, they must, however, be complemented by other data such as from a full cruise.

[1]  M. Flechsig,et al.  Regional impact analysis of climate change on natural and managed forests in the Federal State of Brandenburg, Germany , 1999 .

[2]  H. Bugmann A comparative analysis of forest dynamics in the Swiss Alps and the Colorado Front Range , 2001 .

[3]  Harald Bugmann,et al.  On the ecology of mountainous forests in a changing climate , 1994 .

[4]  Roger G. Barry,et al.  Mountain weather and climate , 1982 .

[5]  A. Solomon,et al.  Forest dynamics in Oregon landscapes: evaluation and application of an individual-based model. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[6]  H. Kromp-Kolb,et al.  The sensitivity of Austrian forests to scenarios of climatic change: a large-scale risk assessment based on a modified gap model and forest inventory data , 2002 .

[7]  A. Rigling,et al.  Sensitivity of stand dynamics to grazing in mixed Pinus sylvestris and Quercus pubescens forests: A modelling study , 2008 .

[8]  Harald Bugmann,et al.  EXPLAINING FOREST COMPOSITION AND BIOMASS ACROSS MULTIPLE BIOGEOGRAPHICAL REGIONS , 2000 .

[9]  Kiona Ogle,et al.  Comparing the Performance of Forest gap Models in North America , 2001 .

[10]  Manfred J. Lexer,et al.  Assessing trade-offs between carbon sequestration and timber production within a framework of multi-purpose forestry in Austria , 2007 .

[11]  M. Lindner,et al.  Model-based analysis of management alternatives at stand and regional level in Brandenburg (Germany) , 2005 .

[12]  D. Faber-Langendoen,et al.  Diameter distributions and structural sustainability in forests , 2006 .

[13]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Tree Species Composition in European Pristine Forests: Comparison of Stand Data to Model Predictions , 2001 .

[14]  William K. Lauenroth,et al.  Models in Ecosystem Science , 2003, Models in Ecosystem Science.

[15]  S. Seagle,et al.  Application of a forest gap model for prediction of browsing effects on riparian forest succession , 2001 .

[16]  M Woltjer,et al.  Coupling a 3D patch model and a rockfall module to assess rockfall protection in mountain forests. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[17]  A. Zingg,et al.  Structure of virgin and managed beech forests in Uholka (Ukraine) and Sihlwald (Switzerland): a comparative study , 2005 .

[18]  H. Bugmann Predicting the Ecosystem Effects of Climate Change , 2003 .

[19]  M. Lexer,et al.  A modified 3D-patch model for spatially explicit simulation of vegetation composition in heterogeneous landscapes , 2001 .

[20]  Andreas Huth,et al.  Using a forest patch model to predict the dynamics of stand structure in Swiss mountain forests , 2005 .

[21]  M. Bürgi,et al.  Integrative methods to study landscape changes , 2001 .

[22]  M. Sykes,et al.  A comparison of forest gap models: Model structure and behaviour , 1996 .

[23]  H. Ellenberg Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen : in ökologischer ,dynamischer und historischer Sicht , 2010 .

[24]  Manfred J. Lexer,et al.  Simulated effects of bark beetle infestations on stand dynamics in Picea abies stands: coupling a patch model and a stand risk model , 1998 .

[25]  W. Keeton,et al.  Disturbances and structural development of natural forest ecosystems with silvicultural implications, using Douglas-fir forests as an example , 2002 .

[26]  Manfred J. Lexer,et al.  Impact of bark beetle (Ips typographus L.) disturbance on timber production and carbon sequestration in different management strategies under climate change , 2008 .

[27]  A. Wolf,et al.  Forty years of natural dynamics in Swiss beech forests: structure, composition, and the influence of former management. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[28]  H. Lischke,et al.  A model‐based reconstruction of Holocene treeline dynamics in the Central Swiss Alps , 2006 .

[29]  A. Lotter,et al.  Validation of a forest succession model by means of annually laminated sediments , 1992 .

[30]  Markus Erhard,et al.  Regional impact assessment on forest structure and functions under climate change—the Brandenburg case study , 2002 .

[31]  A. Watt,et al.  Pattern and process in the plant community , 1947 .

[32]  R. Waring,et al.  A generalised model of forest productivity using simplified concepts of radiation-use efficiency, carbon balance and partitioning , 1997 .

[33]  N. Zimmermann,et al.  Understanding the low-temperature limitations to forest growth through calibration of a forest dynamics model with tree-ring data , 2007 .

[34]  Manfred J. Lexer,et al.  The sensitivity of central European mountain forests to scenarios of climatic change: methodological frame for a large-scale risk assessment , 2000 .

[35]  S. Korpel,et al.  Die Urwälder der Westkarpaten , 1995 .

[36]  Harald Bugmann An efficient method for estimating the steady-state species composition of forest gap models , 1997 .

[37]  H. Bugmann A Simplified Forest Model to Study Species Composition Along Climate Gradients , 1996 .

[38]  T. Webb,,et al.  Computer-Aided Reconstruction of Late-Quaternary Landscape Dynamics , 1985 .

[39]  Hansheinrich Bachofen,et al.  Schweizerisches Landesforstinventar : Ergebnisse der Erstaufnahme 1982-1986 , 1988 .

[40]  Guofan Shao,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of the Structure and Behavior of Three Gap Models at Sites in Northeastern China , 2001 .

[41]  H. Bugmann A Review of Forest Gap Models , 2001 .

[42]  Godefridus M. J. Mohren,et al.  Forest development in relation to ungulate grazing: a modeling approach , 1999 .

[43]  Rupert Seidl,et al.  Evaluating the accuracy and generality of a hybrid patch model. , 2005, Tree physiology.

[44]  E. Wald,et al.  Schweizerisches Landesforstinventar : Ergebnisse der Zweitaufnahme 1993-1995 , 1999 .

[45]  Matthias Bürgi,et al.  A case study of forest change in the Swiss lowlands , 1999, Landscape Ecology.

[46]  Christian Gamborg,et al.  'Back to nature': a sustainable future for forestry? , 2003 .

[47]  F. Kienast,et al.  Modeling successional patterns of high-elevation forests under changing herbivore pressure – responses at the landscape level , 1999 .

[48]  P. White,et al.  The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics , 1986 .

[49]  H. Shugart A Theory of Forest Dynamics , 1984 .

[50]  W. Beckman,et al.  Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes , 1985 .

[51]  M. Lindner,et al.  Alternative forest management strategies under climatic change - prospects for gap model applications in risk analyses. , 2000 .

[52]  H. Vacik,et al.  MODELLING THE EFFECT OF FOREST SITE CONDITIONS ON THE ECOPHYSIOLOGICAL SUITABILITY OF TREE SPECIES: AN APPROACH BASED ON FUZZY SET THEORY , 2000 .

[53]  H. Bugmann,et al.  Simulating structural forest patterns with a forest gap model: a model evaluation , 2005 .

[54]  J. R. Wallis,et al.  Some ecological consequences of a computer model of forest growth , 1972 .

[55]  H. Bugmann,et al.  Improving the establishment submodel of a forest patch model to assess the long-term protective effect of mountain forests , 2006, European Journal of Forest Research.

[56]  Charles T. Scott,et al.  SAMPLING METHODS FOR ESTIMATING CHANGE IN FOREST RESOURCES , 1998 .

[57]  P. Lüscher,et al.  Gebirgsnadelwälder: Ein praxisorientierter Leitfaden für eine standortgerechte Waldbehandlung , 1997 .

[58]  W. Cramer,et al.  Regional impacts of climatic change on forests in the state of Brandenburg, Germany , 1997 .