Collapse analysis of slender masonry barrel vaults

Abstract Significant part of the world cultural heritage is represented by masonry buildings. Many of them are characterised by a complex architecture like as the religious buildings and need to be preserved, from a structural point of view, especially in high seismic risk areas. The recent earthquakes showed that the Historical and Monumental buildings are often characterised by high seismic vulnerability. The lowest seismic performances are associated with the presence of thrusting elements like as arches and vaults. In this background, the numerical analyses and experimental simulations provide important information about the structural behaviour of such elements. The structural behaviour of curved elements can be complex to simulate and to predict exclusively by numerical analyses. Indeed, the experimental tests can provide an efficient contribution to the calibration and interpretation of the numerical models. The present work focuses on a particular typology of vaults generally used as roofs in religious buildings. These vaults typically do not include any backfill and are slender. These typologies of masonry vaults cannot be analysed with classical approaches where no-tension is assumed. In fact, the tensile strength must be included in order to assess the seismic capacity of these masonry elements. A simplified analytical model, which includes the tensile strength, was proposed. Validation of the analytical model is provided by comparing predictions of the load capacity and the failure mode with those obtained from previous shaking table test series on two full scale masonry vaults. The proposed method represents a useful modelling tool in order to design dynamic tests on masonry vaults and to assess their vulnerability.

[1]  M. Angelillo,et al.  Structural capacity of masonry walls under horizontal loads , 2014 .

[2]  A. Prota,et al.  In-plane behaviour of tuff masonry strengthened with inorganic matrix–grid composites , 2013 .

[3]  Paolo Foraboschi,et al.  Strengthening of Masonry Arches with Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Strips , 2004 .

[4]  Andrea Prota,et al.  Nonlinear Behavior of a Masonry Subassemblage Before and After Strengthening with Inorganic Matrix-Grid Composites , 2011 .

[5]  Gaetano Manfredi,et al.  Simple Method for the Design of Jet Grouted Umbrellas in Tunneling , 2008 .

[6]  C. Callari,et al.  Localization Analysis in Dilatant Elasto-Plastic Solids by a Strong-Discontinuity Method , 2004 .

[7]  A. Prota,et al.  In-Plane Lateral Response of a Full-Scale Masonry Subassemblage with and without an Inorganic Matrix-Grid Strengthening System , 2011 .

[8]  A. Prota,et al.  Nonlinear Analyses of Tuff Masonry Walls Strengthened with Cementitious Matrix-Grid Composites , 2009 .

[9]  Georgios E. Stavroulakis,et al.  FRP reinforcement of stone arch bridges: Unilateral contact models and limit analysis , 2007 .

[10]  A. Prota,et al.  Experimental In-Plane Behavior of Tuff Masonry Strengthened with Cementitious Matrix–Grid Composites , 2006 .

[11]  Andrea Prota,et al.  Nonlinear Analyses of Adobe Masonry Walls Reinforced with Fiberglass Mesh , 2014 .

[12]  Irving J. Oppenheim,et al.  The masonry arch as a four‐link mechanism under base motion , 1992 .

[13]  Matthew Gilbert,et al.  Influence of backfill on the capacity of masonry arch bridges , 2012 .

[14]  Thomas E. Boothby,et al.  Three-dimensional modelling and full-scale testing of stone arch bridges , 2001 .

[15]  L. Rovero,et al.  Strengthening Masonry Arches with Composite Materials , 2007 .

[16]  Andrea Prota,et al.  Experimental investigation of the seismic performances of IMG reinforcement on curved masonry elements , 2015 .

[17]  Jacques Heyman,et al.  The Stone Skeleton: Structural Engineering of Masonry Architecture , 1997 .

[18]  Jorge Alfaiate,et al.  The effect of the infill in arched structures: Analytical and numerical modelling , 2011 .

[19]  Antonio Fortunato,et al.  Equilibrium of Masonry Vaults , 2004 .

[20]  G. Felice,et al.  A homogenization approach to the ultimate strength of brick masonry , 1997 .

[21]  Thomas E. Boothby,et al.  Longitudinal and transverse effects in masonry arch assessment , 2001 .

[22]  M. Angelillo,et al.  Singular stress fields in masonry structures: Derand was right , 2014 .

[23]  C Melbourne,et al.  THE BEHAVIOUR OF MULTIRING BRICKWORK ARCH BRIDGES , 1995 .

[24]  A. Prota,et al.  Numerical Investigation on the Influence of FRP Retrofit Layout and Geometry on the In-Plane Behavior of Masonry Walls , 2012 .

[25]  David García,et al.  Rehabilitation of masonry arches with compatible advanced composite material , 2011 .

[26]  M. Angelillo,et al.  Singular stress fields for masonry-like vaults , 2013 .

[27]  A. Borri,et al.  Strengthening of Brick Masonry Arches with Externally Bonded Steel Reinforced Composites , 2009 .

[28]  Katalin Bagi When Heyman’s Safe Theorem of rigid block systems fails: Non-Heymanian collapse modes of masonry structures , 2014 .

[29]  Giorgio Zavarise,et al.  Numerical study on the dynamic behavior of masonry columns and arches on buttresses with the discrete element method , 2011 .

[30]  A. Prota,et al.  Shaking table tests on a full-scale unreinforced and IMG-retrofitted clay brick masonry barrel vault , 2016, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[31]  Stefano De Santis,et al.  A fibre beam‐based approach for the evaluation of the seismic capacity of masonry arches , 2014 .

[32]  Antonio Brencich,et al.  Masonry Arches: Historical Rules and Modern Mechanics , 2007 .