Mining students' learning patterns and performance in Web-based instruction: a cognitive style approach

Personalization has been widely used in Web-based instruction (WBI). To deliver effective personalization, there is a need to understand different preferences of each student. Cognitive style has been identified as one of the most pertinent factors that affect students' learning preferences. Therefore, it is essential to investigate how learners with different cognitive styles interact with WBI programs. This paper presents an empirical study, which examines the effects of cognitive styles on students' learning patterns and the effects of learning patterns on their learning performances. Riding's cognitive style analysis was used to identify the students' cognitive styles. Data mining, especially a clustering technique, was used to analyze the results. It was found that field independent students frequently used an alphabetical index whereas field dependent students often chose a hierarchical map. Such learning patterns also have great effects on their performance, especially for field dependent students.

[1]  George D. Magoulas,et al.  A flexible interface design for Web directories to accommodate different cognitive styles , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[2]  Robert D. Macredie,et al.  Cognitive Modeling of Student Learning in Web-Based Instructional Programs , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[3]  Michael L. Gargano,et al.  Data mining - a powerful information creating tool , 1999, OCLC Syst. Serv..

[4]  George Karypis,et al.  Selective Markov models for predicting Web page accesses , 2004, TOIT.

[5]  E. Sadler‐Smith,et al.  Type of Instructional Material, Cognitive Style and Learning Performance , 1992 .

[6]  Andreas S. Pomportsis,et al.  The design and the formative evaluation of an adaptive educational system based on cognitive styles , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[7]  Alfred Kobsa,et al.  Personalised hypermedia presentation techniques for improving online customer relationships , 2001, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[8]  C. A. Moore,et al.  FIELD‐DEPENDENT AND FIELD‐INDEPENDENT COGNITIVE STYLES AND THEIR EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS , 1975 .

[9]  James R. Nolan,et al.  Computer Systems That Learn: an Empirical Study of the Effect of Noise on the Performance of Three Classification Methods Computer Systems That Learn: an Empirical Study of the Effect of Noise on the Performance of Three Classification Methods , 2022 .

[10]  Sally Jo Cunningham,et al.  Market basket analysis of library circulation data , 1999, ICONIP'99. ANZIIS'99 & ANNES'99 & ACNN'99. 6th International Conference on Neural Information Processing. Proceedings (Cat. No.99EX378).

[11]  Judi Repman,et al.  The Relationship of Learning, Behavior, and Cognitive Style in Hypermedia-Based Instruction: Implications for Design of HBI , 1995, Planning Continuing Professional Development.

[12]  Daniel Light,et al.  The Union City Story: Education Reform and Technology Students' Performance on Standardized Tests. , 1998 .

[13]  Xindong Wu,et al.  Mining Both Positive and Negative Association Rules , 2002, ICML.

[14]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Supporting application development in the Semantic Web , 2003 .

[15]  Stefano Cacciamani Imparare navigando: stile cognitivo ed apprendimento in un sistema ipermediale , 2002 .

[16]  P. Stephen,et al.  Simple Statistics for Library and Information Professionals , 1995 .

[17]  Enrique Frías-Martínez,et al.  Automatic cognitive style identification of digital library users for personalization , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[18]  John R. Maltby,et al.  Adaptive Educational Hypermedia Based on Multiple Student Characteristics , 2003, ICWL.

[19]  N. Tallent Psychological testing. , 1960, The American journal of nursing.

[20]  J. Leon Zhao,et al.  Automatic discovery of similarity relationships through Web mining , 2003, Decis. Support Syst..

[21]  Alfred Kobsa,et al.  A Review and Analysis of Commercial User Modeling Servers for Personalization on the World Wide Web , 2000, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[22]  Dell Zhang,et al.  A novel Web usage mining approach for search engines , 2002, Comput. Networks.

[23]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  A quantitative comparison of functional MRI cluster analysis , 2004, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[24]  Liliana Ardissono,et al.  A multi-agent infrastructure for developing personalized web-based systems , 2005, TOIT.

[25]  Rakesh Agarwal,et al.  Fast Algorithms for Mining Association Rules , 1994, VLDB 1994.

[26]  Carolena L. Lyons-Lawrence Effect of Learning Style on Performance in Using Computer-Based Instruction in Office Systems , 1994 .

[27]  G. Pask STYLES AND STRATEGIES OF LEARNING , 1976 .

[28]  Luis E. Anido-Rifón,et al.  Internet-based learning by doing , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[29]  David Enke,et al.  The adaptive selection of financial and economic variables for use with artificial neural networks , 2004, Neurocomputing.

[30]  Heikki Mannila,et al.  Principles of Data Mining , 2001, Undergraduate Topics in Computer Science.

[31]  Jinwoo Kim,et al.  Contextual Navigation Aids for Two World Wide Web Systems , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[32]  Tzu-Chuen Lu,et al.  Mining association rules procedure to support on-line recommendation by customers and products fragmentation , 2001, Expert Syst. Appl..

[33]  Robert D. Macredie,et al.  Cognitive styles and hypermedia navigation: Development of a learning model , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[34]  M. Braga,et al.  Exploratory Data Analysis , 2018, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. 2nd Ed..

[35]  Robert D. Macredie,et al.  Cognitive Styles and Adaptive Web-based Learning , 2005 .

[36]  Xiaohui Liu,et al.  The contribution of data mining to information science , 2004, J. Inf. Sci..

[37]  Kathryn F. Cochran,et al.  An information processing view of field dependence‐independence∗ , 1989 .

[38]  George Ghinea,et al.  The impact of cognitive styles on perceptual distributed multimedia quality , 2003, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[39]  R. Kozma,et al.  Individuality in learning. , 1978 .

[40]  Yi-Fan Wang,et al.  A personalized recommender system for the cosmetic business , 2004, Expert Syst. Appl..

[42]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  The effects of graphic organizers giving cues to the structure of a hypertext document on users' navigation strategies and performance , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[43]  Chien-Hung Liu,et al.  Assessment of Effectiveness of Web-based Training on Demand , 2007, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[44]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Users' interaction with World Wide Web resources: an exploratory study using a holistic approach , 2000, Inf. Process. Manag..

[45]  Nigel Ford,et al.  Matching/mismatching revisited: an empirical study of learning and teaching styles , 2001, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[46]  Romain Zeiliger,et al.  Designing Navigational Support for Educational Software , 1995, EWHCI.

[47]  Giovanni Semeraro,et al.  Discovering Student Models in e-Learning Systems , 2004, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[48]  Ujjwal Maulik,et al.  An evolutionary technique based on K-Means algorithm for optimal clustering in RN , 2002, Inf. Sci..