Detecting endangered pinto abalone ( Haliotis kamtschatkana ) using environmental DNA : Comparison of ddPCR , qPCR , and conventional diver surveys

[1]  H. Carson,et al.  Efficacy of Endangered Pinto Abalone (Haliotis kamtschatkana) Stock Restoration in the Southern Salish Sea From a Genomic Perspective , 2022, Frontiers in Conservation Science.

[2]  Ashley M. Fowler,et al.  Environmental DNA (eDNA) as a tool for assessing fish biomass: A review of approaches and future considerations for resource surveys , 2021, Environmental DNA.

[3]  R. Huerlimann,et al.  Validation of eDNA as a viable method of detection for dangerous cubozoan jellyfish , 2020, Environmental DNA.

[4]  J. Auwerx,et al.  Reliable eDNA detection and quantification of the European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis). , 2020, Journal of fish biology.

[5]  C. Abbott,et al.  Analytical validation and field testing of a specific qPCR assay for environmental DNA detection of invasive European green crab ( Carcinus maenas ) , 2020 .

[6]  C. Richter,et al.  Reporting the limits of detection and quantification for environmental DNA assays , 2019, Environmental DNA.

[7]  P. Cook.  Worldwide Abalone Production Statistics , 2019, Journal of Shellfish Research.

[8]  H. Carson,et al.  The survival of hatchery‐origin pinto abalone Haliotis kamtschatkana released into Washington waters , 2019, Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems.

[9]  Satoshi Yamamoto,et al.  Effect of water temperature and fish biomass on environmental DNA shedding, degradation, and size distribution , 2019, Ecology and evolution.

[10]  L. Plough,et al.  Environmental DNA analysis of river herring in Chesapeake Bay: A powerful tool for monitoring threatened keystone species , 2018, PloS one.

[11]  K. Stierhoff,et al.  A Status Review of Pinto Abalone (Haliotis kamtschatkana) Along the West Coastof North America: Interpreting Trends, Addressing Uncertainty, and Assessing Risk for a Wide-Ranging Marine Invertebrate , 2018, Journal of Shellfish Research.

[12]  E. K. Pikitch,et al.  A tool for finding rare marine species , 2018, Science.

[13]  R. Kelly,et al.  The effect of tides on nearshore environmental DNA , 2018, PeerJ.

[14]  Gregory D. Williams,et al.  Spatial distribution of environmental DNA in a nearshore marine habitat , 2017, PeerJ.

[15]  C. Johnston,et al.  Saving the doomed: Using eDNA to aid in detection of rare sturgeon for conservation (Acipenseridae) , 2016 .

[16]  Florent Baty,et al.  Dose-Response Analysis Using R , 2015, PLoS ONE.

[17]  Jesse A. Port,et al.  Assessing vertebrate biodiversity in a kelp forest ecosystem using environmental DNA , 2015, Molecular ecology.

[18]  H. Doi,et al.  Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) outperforms real-time PCR in the detection of environmental DNA from an invasive fish species. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  Environmental DNA for wildlife biology and biodiversity monitoring. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  T. Dingle,et al.  Tolerance of droplet-digital PCR vs real-time quantitative PCR to inhibitory substances. , 2013, Clinical chemistry.

[21]  Eske Willerslev,et al.  Detection of a Diverse Marine Fish Fauna Using Environmental DNA from Seawater Samples , 2012, PloS one.

[22]  C. Friedman,et al.  Low Juvenile Pinto Abalone Haliotis kamtschatkana kamtschatkana Abundance in the San Juan Archipelago, Washington State , 2012 .

[23]  Robert S. Arkle,et al.  Molecular Detection of Vertebrates in Stream Water: A Demonstration Using Rocky Mountain Tailed Frogs and Idaho Giant Salamanders , 2011, PloS one.

[24]  Brent Vadopalas,et al.  Application of real-time PCR for simultaneous identification and quantification of larval abalone , 2006 .