Changes in healthy and unhealthy working life expectancies among older working-age people in Finland, 2000–2017

Abstract Background Raising the statutory retirement age has been a common policy response to population ageing, but health problems may restrict labour force participation in older ages. We examined the development of healthy and unhealthy working life expectancies in Finland from 2000 to 2017 using different measures of health problems. Methods Healthy and unhealthy working life expectancies were calculated for the age range 50–65 years using the Sullivan method. The health measures were limiting long-standing illness, self-rated health, mental health problems and self-assessed work ability. Results Healthy working life expectancy was highest when health was measured by work ability. From 2000 to 2017, working years in full ability between the ages 50–65 increased from 6.2 (95% confidence interval 5.9–6.4) to 8.2 (8.0–8.5). Healthy working life expectancy increased also when measured by the other indicators. Unhealthy working years also increased, except when health problems were measured by limiting long-standing illness. The share of years in work increased both within the healthy and the unhealthy years, the increase being larger or equally large for the latter. Within the healthy and unhealthy years measured by the other three indicators, the share of working years increased irrespective of whether work ability was full or limited, but the increase was larger for limited work ability. Conclusions In Finland, healthy working life expectancy has increased irrespective of how health is measured but also working with health problems has become more prevalent. The estimates for healthy working years are highest when a direct measure of work ability is used.

[1]  C. Dudel Healthy and unhealthy working-life expectancy: opportunities and challenges. , 2021, The Lancet. Healthy longevity.

[2]  M. Boissonneault,et al.  Changes in healthy and unhealthy working-life expectancy over the period 2002-17: a population-based study in people aged 51-65 years in 14 OECD countries. , 2021, The Lancet. Healthy longevity.

[3]  P. Martikainen,et al.  Incentives, Health, and Retirement: Evidence from a Finnish Pension Reform , 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[4]  A. Heinemann,et al.  Job Accommodations, Return to Work and Job Retention of People with Physical Disabilities: A Systematic Review , 2021, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[5]  D. Weber,et al.  Live longer, retire later? Developments of healthy life expectancies and working life expectancies between age 50–59 and age 60–69 in Europe , 2020, European Journal of Ageing.

[6]  C. Jagger,et al.  Population-based estimates of healthy working life expectancy in England at age 50 years: analysis of data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. , 2020, The Lancet. Public health.

[7]  A. Burdorf,et al.  Influence of changing working conditions on exit from paid employment among workers with a chronic disease , 2020, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[8]  M. Kivimäki,et al.  Psychotropic medication before and after disability retirement by pre-retirement perceived work-related stress. , 2019, European journal of public health.

[9]  S. Lanham-New,et al.  Strategies for optimising musculoskeletal health in the 21st century , 2019, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[10]  J. Head,et al.  Mental Health Before and After Retirement—Assessing the Relevance of Psychosocial Working Conditions: The Whitehall II Prospective Study of British Civil Servants , 2019, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[11]  C. Boot,et al.  Working life expectancy in good and poor self-perceived health among Dutch workers aged 55–65 years with a chronic disease over the period 1992–2016 , 2018, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[12]  S. van der Pas,et al.  Changes in working life expectancy with disability in the Netherlands, 1992-2016. , 2018, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[13]  L. Zuo,et al.  Recent Advances in Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease: Role of Science and Technology , 2018, International journal of molecular sciences.

[14]  Q. Mahood,et al.  Workplace accommodations for persons with physical disabilities: evidence synthesis of the peer-reviewed literature , 2017, Disability and rehabilitation.

[15]  E. Viikari-Juntura,et al.  Workplace Interventions to Prevent Disability from Both the Scientific and Practice Perspectives: A Comparison of Scientific Literature, Grey Literature and Stakeholder Observations , 2016, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[16]  T. Chandola,et al.  Health as a predictor of early retirement before and after introduction of a flexible statutory pension age in Finland. , 2016, Social science & medicine.

[17]  Noelle Chesley Information and communication technology use, work intensification and employee strain and distress , 2014 .

[18]  A. Burdorf,et al.  The impact of ill health on exit from paid employment in Europe among older workers , 2010, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[19]  Carol Jagger,et al.  Health Expectancy Calculation by the Sullivan Method: A Practical Guide , 1999 .

[20]  C. Mathers,et al.  How good is Sullivan's method for monitoring changes in population health expectancies? , 1997, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[21]  O. Gureje,et al.  The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care , 1997, Psychological Medicine.

[22]  D. Sullivan,et al.  A single index of mortality and morbidity. , 1971, HSMHA health reports.

[23]  OUP accepted manuscript , 2022, European Journal Of Public Health.

[24]  D. van Klaveren,et al.  The influence of poor health on competing exit routes from paid employment among older workers in 11 European countries. , 2017, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[25]  Nina Nevala,et al.  Persons with partial work ability at work: A study of the feasibility and benefits of the Osku-concept in different contexts , 2016 .