The experience of road environments under two lighting and traffic conditions: application of a Road Environment Construct List

The aim of this study is to find out whether the different accident rates on two roads may be explained by drivers' different appreciations of these roads. Therefore a rating scale specially developed for the evaluation of drivers' experience of the road environment was used. The study is based on the assumption that experience of the road environment is an important factor in driving behaviour. An experiment was carried out in which two roads were compared in daylight and darkness, with and without traffic. The roads were presented on films. Subjects' evaluation scores appeared to be founded on three factors, which explained 66.8 per cent of the variance. The factors were named 'hedonic value', 'activational value' and 'perceptual variation'. Composite scores were constructed from the rating scale scores for each factor, per road, and condition. This revealed that the two roads differed on all three factors. Ambient lighting and traffic conditions also influenced the values of the factors and some interactions were found. The range of scores for one road was greater than for the other. The road that ranked lowest on activational level and perceptual variation, especially during daylight conditions with no traffic, was ranked highest on hedonic value. This combination of conditions and experiences could explain the higher rate of 'incomprehensible' single vehicle accidents on that road compared with the other.

[1]  G. W. Williams,et al.  HIGHWAY HYPNOSIS: AN HYPOTHESIS. , 1963, The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis.

[2]  D. Berlyne Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value , 1970 .

[3]  Joachim F. Wohlwill,et al.  Amount of stimulus exploration and preference as differential functions of stimulus complexity , 1968 .

[4]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  Constructie van een schaal ter beoordeling van wegomgevingen , 1991 .

[5]  Alexander H. Wertheim,et al.  Explaining highway hypnosis: Experimental evidence for the role of eye movements , 1978 .

[6]  Jack L. Nasar,et al.  Environmental aesthetics : theory, research, and applications , 1988 .

[7]  R. Yerkes,et al.  The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit‐formation , 1908 .

[8]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[9]  J. Russell Environmental aesthetics: Affective appraisals of environments , 1988 .

[10]  Harry Munsinger,et al.  Uncertainty, structure, and preference. , 1964 .

[11]  Richard Bell,et al.  A manual for repertory grid technique , 1977 .

[12]  A H Wertheim,et al.  Oculomotor control and occipital alpha activity: a review and a hypothesis. , 1974, Acta psychologica.

[13]  D. Hebb Drives and the C.N.S. (conceptual nervous system). , 1955, Psychological review.

[14]  Philip Sarre,et al.  Personal Construct Theory I N the Measurement of Environmental Images , 1975 .

[15]  Talib Rothengatter,et al.  Risk and the absence of pleasure: a motivational approach to modelling road user behaviour , 1988 .

[16]  R. Jackendoff Consciousness and the Computational Mind , 1987 .

[17]  J. Easterbrook The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. , 1959, Psychological review.

[18]  Jay Appleton,et al.  Prospects and Refuges Re-Visited , 1984, Landscape Journal.

[19]  D. Berlyne,et al.  Aesthetics and Psychobiology , 1975 .

[20]  R. Hudson Images of the Retailing Environment , 1974 .

[21]  C. Osgood,et al.  The Measurement of Meaning , 1958 .

[22]  R. Millward,et al.  The Experience of Landscape , 1988 .

[23]  W. Wundt,et al.  Grundzüge der physiologischen psyhcologie , 1893 .

[24]  H. Day Evaluations of subjective complexity, pleasingness and interestingness for a series of random polygons varying in complexity , 1967 .