Knowledge and information for clinical governance

This is the last of five articles The new requirements of clinical governance are a challenge for everyone working in the NHS. If the quality of health care is to be improved, existing knowledge about effective clinical and organisational practice must be applied and new information to monitor and evaluate care must be generated and interpreted. Within individual general practices and primary care teams, all staff will have a role in obtaining and using information for clinical governance—whether for maintaining chronic disease registers, promoting evidence based practice, improving the organisation of services, or reporting on the outcomes of care. In primary care groups and trusts, there is greater emphasis on improving the health of the population. This requires the collection and aggregation of information across practices to assess health needs, reduce inequalities, and monitor the quality of care in comparison to agreed standards. In this paper, we discuss the additional knowledge that will be needed by all staff working in primary care and the challenges faced by leaders of primary care groups and trusts. We suggest where they can find relevant information. Everyone in primary care needs to be familiar with these sources if clinical governance is to succeed as a way to improve the quality of health care. #### Summary points Everyone in primary care needs to be familiar with the requirements of clinical governance if it is to succeed as a way to improve the quality of care Producing, collecting, and analysing primary care information is difficult, but some practices have already overcome these barriers Individuals and primary care group and trust leaders can do much to promote clinical governance, but problems remain Clinical governance has highlighted the need for additional knowledge and information on determinants of population health Many problems exist with producing, collecting, and analysing the necessary information; we …

[1]  Bonnie Sibbald,et al.  National Primary Care Research and Development Centre , 2001 .

[2]  Martin Roland,et al.  Measuring quality of care with routine data: avoiding confusion between performance indicators and health outcomes , 1999, BMJ.

[3]  D. Bain Patient knowledge and the content of the consultation in general practice , 1977, Medical education.

[4]  M. Pringle,et al.  Preventing ischaemic heart disease in one general practice: from one patient, through clinical audit, needs assessment, and commissioning into quality improvement , 1998, BMJ.

[5]  R. Haynes,et al.  Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 1998, JAMA.

[6]  Richard Savage,et al.  Effect of a general practitioner's consulting style on patients' satisfaction: a controlled study. , 1990, BMJ.

[7]  J. Spencer,et al.  Collecting data in general practice: need for standardisation , 1996, BMJ.

[8]  B. Cassileth,et al.  Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. , 1980, Annals of internal medicine.

[9]  A. Ash,et al.  Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. , 1989, Journal of general internal medicine.

[10]  A. Cartwright,et al.  Social Class Variations in Health Care and in the Nature of General Practitioner Consultations , 1974, Sociological review monograph.

[11]  S. Murray,et al.  Assessment in primary care : practical issues and possible approaches , 1998 .

[12]  John Gabbay,et al.  Clinical governance in primary care groups: the feasibility of deriving evidence-based performance indicators , 2000, Quality in health care : QHC.

[13]  Simon de Lusignan,et al.  National electronic Library for Health (NeLH) , 1999, BMJ.

[14]  R. Rosen,et al.  Organisational development for clinical governance , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  R. Haynes,et al.  Effects of Computer-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems on Physician Performance and Patient Outcomes , 1998 .

[16]  M. Pringle Participating in clinical governance , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  S. Macintyre,et al.  What is, must be best: a research note on conservative or deferential responses to antenatal care provision. , 1984, Social science & medicine.

[18]  R. Rosen Improving quality in the changing world of primary care , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  S. Satya‐Murti Evidence-based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM , 1997 .

[20]  R. Botelho,et al.  A negotiation model for the doctor-patient relationship. , 1992, Family practice.

[21]  Jenny Field,et al.  General practitioners' perceptions of the route to evidence based medicine: a questionnaire survey , 1998, BMJ.

[22]  S. Murray,et al.  Practice based health needs assessment: use of four methods in a small neighbourhood , 1995, BMJ.

[23]  D A Pendleton,et al.  The communication of medical information in general practice consultations as a function of patients' social class. , 1980, Social science & medicine. Medical psychology & medical sociology.

[24]  J. Prochaska,et al.  In Search of How People Change: Applications to Addictive Behaviors , 1992, The American psychologist.

[25]  M. Gulliford,et al.  Health Care Needs Assessment: The Epidemiologically Based Needs Assessment Reviews , 1994 .

[26]  J Gabbay,et al.  Performance indicators for primary care groups: an evidence based approach , 1998, BMJ.

[27]  D. Shapiro,et al.  Sounding board. The psychology of responsibility: some second thoughts on holistic medicine. , 1979, The New England journal of medicine.