Are Rindler Quanta Real? Inequivalent Particle Concepts in Quantum Field Theory

Philosophical reflection on quantum field theory has tended to focus on how it revises our conception of what a particle is. However, there has been relatively little discussion of the threat to the ‘reality’ of particles posed by the possibility of inequivalent quantizations of a classical field theory, i.e. inequivalent representations of the algebra of observables of the field in terms of operators on a Hilbert space. The threat is that each representation embodies its own distinctive conception of what a particle is, and how a ‘particle’ will respond to a suitably operated detector. Our main goal is to clarify the subtle relationship between inequivalent representations of a field theory and their associated particle concepts. We also have a particular interest in the Minkowski versus Rindler quantizations of a free Boson field, because they respectively entail two radically different descriptions of the particle content of the field in the very same region of spacetime. We shall defend the idea that these representations provide complementary descriptions of the same state of the field against the claim that they embody completely incommensurable theories of the field.

[1]  S. Fulling Aspects of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-Time: Quantization of a static, scalar field theory , 1989 .

[2]  P. Teller On Huggett and Weingard's Review of an Interpretive Introduction to Quantum Field Theory: Continuing the Discussion , 1998, Philosophy of Science.

[3]  Hans Halvorson Reeh-Schlieder Defeats Newton-Wigner: On Alternative Localization Schemes in Relativistic Quantum Field Theory , 2000, Philosophy of Science.

[4]  Gerlach Quantum states of a field partitioned by an accelerated frame. , 1989, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[5]  Unitary equivalence of Fock representations on the Weyl algebra , 1971 .

[6]  Rudolf Carnap Introduction to the Philosophy of Science , 1966 .

[7]  V. Belinskiǐ,et al.  Does the Unruh effect exist? , 1997 .

[8]  Clark Glymour,et al.  Theoretical Realism and Theoretical Equivalence , 1970, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

[9]  O. Bratteli Operator Algebras And Quantum Statistical Mechanics , 1979 .

[10]  H. L. Armstrong,et al.  On the Nature of a Physical Theory , 1966 .

[11]  Mario Bunge,et al.  Philosophy of Physics , 1972 .

[12]  R. Kadison,et al.  Fundamentals of the Theory of Operator Algebras , 1983 .

[13]  Irving Ezra Segal Foundations of the theory of dynamical systems of infinitely many degrees of freedom , 1959 .

[14]  S. Khoruzhiĭ Introduction to algebraic quantum field theory , 1990 .

[15]  Hans Halvorson,et al.  Entanglement and Open Systems in Algebraic Quantum Field Theory , 2001 .

[16]  Paul Teller,et al.  An Interpretive Introduction to Quantum Field Theory , 1994 .

[17]  R. Haag,et al.  Local quantum physics , 1992 .

[18]  S. J. Summers On the Stone — von Neumann Uniqueness Theorem and Its Ramifications , 2001 .

[19]  W. Unruh,et al.  What happens when an accelerating observer detects a Rindler particle , 1984 .

[20]  John E. Roberts,et al.  Some basic concepts of algebraic quantum theory , 1969 .

[21]  S. Fulling,et al.  Book-Review - Aspects of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime , 1989 .

[22]  J. Neumann Die Eindeutigkeit der Schrödingerschen Operatoren , 1931 .

[23]  R. Verch Local definiteness, primarity and quasiequivalence of quasifree Hadamard quantum states in curved spacetime , 1994 .

[24]  J. Fell The dual spaces of *-algebras , 1960 .

[25]  Josef Maria Jauch Are Quanta Real? A Galilean Dialogue , 1974 .

[26]  Laura Ruetsche,et al.  Weyling the time away: The non-unitary implementability of quantum field dynamics on curved spacetime , 2002 .

[27]  Bryce S. DeWitt,et al.  Quantum gravity: the new synthesis. , 1979 .

[28]  D. Deutsch,et al.  Quantum field theory, horizons and thermodynamics , 1981 .

[29]  H. Reichenbach Experience and Prediction. An Analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge , 1938 .

[30]  I. Segal,et al.  Introduction to Algebraic and Constructive Quantum Field Theory , 1992 .

[31]  R. Wald Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime and Black Hole Thermodynamics , 1994 .

[32]  Hans Halvorson,et al.  Maximal Beable Subalgebras of Quantum Mechanical Observables , 1999 .

[33]  B. S. Kay The double-wedge algebra for quantum fields on Schwarzschild and Minkowski spacetimes , 1985 .

[34]  I. Segal Foundations of the Theory of Dynamical Systems of Infinitely Many Degrees of Freedom, II , 1961, Canadian Journal of Mathematics.

[35]  J. Chaiken FINITE-PARTICLE REPRESENTATIONS AND STATES OF THE CANONICAL COMMUTATION RELATIONS. , 1967 .

[36]  Gérard G. Emch,et al.  Algebraic methods in statistical mechanics and quantum field theory , 1972 .

[37]  Richard V. Kadison,et al.  Transformations of states in operator theory and dynamics , 1965 .

[38]  G. Röpke,et al.  Operational Quantum Physics , 1997 .

[39]  G. Mackey,et al.  Mathematical problems of relativistic physics , 1963 .

[40]  R. Wald,et al.  Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime , 1995, gr-qc/9509057.

[41]  Dénes Petz,et al.  An invitation to the algebra of canonical commutation relations , 1990 .

[42]  H. Araki On representations of the canonical commutation relations , 1971 .

[43]  Hans Halvorson On the Nature of Continuous Physical Quantities in Classical and Quantum Mechanics , 2001, J. Philos. Log..