Application of Constrained Optimization Methods in Health Services Research: Report 2 of the ISPOR Optimization Methods Emerging Good Practices Task Force.

BACKGROUND Constrained optimization methods are already widely used in health care to solve problems that represent traditional applications of operations research methods, such as choosing the optimal location for new facilities or making the most efficient use of operating room capacity. OBJECTIVES In this paper we illustrate the potential utility of these methods for finding optimal solutions to problems in health care delivery and policy. To do so, we selected three award-winning papers in health care delivery or policy development, reflecting a range of optimization algorithms. Two of the three papers are reviewed using the ISPOR Constrained Optimization Good Practice Checklist, adapted from the framework presented in the initial Optimization Task Force Report. The first case study illustrates application of linear programming to determine the optimal mix of screening and vaccination strategies for the prevention of cervical cancer. The second case illustrates application of the Markov Decision Process to find the optimal strategy for treating type 2 diabetes patients for hypercholesterolemia using statins. The third paper (described in Appendix 1) is used as an educational tool. The goal is to describe the characteristics of a radiation therapy optimization problem and then invite the reader to formulate the mathematical model for solving it. This example is particularly interesting because it lends itself to a range of possible models, including linear, nonlinear, and mixed-integer programming formulations. From the case studies presented, we hope the reader will develop an appreciation for the wide range of problem types that can be addressed with constrained optimization methods, as well as the variety of methods available. CONCLUSIONS Constrained optimization methods are informative in providing insights to decision makers about optimal target solutions and the magnitude of the loss of benefit or increased costs associated with the ultimate clinical decision or policy choice. Failing to identify a mathematically superior or optimal solution represents a missed opportunity to improve economic efficiency in the delivery of care and clinical outcomes for patients. The ISPOR Optimization Methods Emerging Good Practices Task Force's first report provided an introduction to constrained optimization methods to solve important clinical and health policy problems. This report also outlined the relationship of constrained optimization methods relative to traditional health economic modeling, graphically illustrated a simple formulation, and identified some of the major variants of constrained optimization models, such as linear programming, dynamic programming, integer programming, and stochastic programming. The second report illustrates the application of constrained optimization methods in health care decision making using three case studies. The studies focus on determining optimal screening and vaccination strategies for cervical cancer, optimal statin start times for diabetes, and an educational case to invite the reader to formulate radiation therapy optimization problems. These illustrate a wide range of problem types that can be addressed with constrained optimization methods.

[1]  Averill M. Law How to Build Valid and Credible Simulation Models , 2019, 2019 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC).

[2]  Dick den Hertog,et al.  A practical guide to robust optimization , 2015, 1501.02634.

[3]  Matthew J. Liberatore,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decision making: A literature review , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Baudouin Standaert,et al.  Selecting a Mix of Prevention Strategies against Cervical Cancer for Maximum Efficiency with an Optimization Program , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.

[5]  Beate Jahn,et al.  Resource Modelling: The Missing Piece of the HTA Jigsaw? , 2014, PharmacoEconomics.

[6]  Margaret L Brandeau,et al.  HIV Treatment and Prevention , 2016, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[7]  A A Stinnett,et al.  Mathematical programming for the efficient allocation of health care resources. , 1996, Journal of health economics.

[8]  Michael C. Fu,et al.  Optimization for Simulation: Theory vs. Practice , 2002 .

[9]  Nilay D Shah,et al.  Optimizing the Start Time of Statin Therapy for Patients with Diabetes , 2009, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[10]  A. Roth,et al.  Two-sided matching , 1990 .

[11]  Nathaniel D Osgood,et al.  Selecting a dynamic simulation modeling method for health care delivery research-part 2: report of the ISPOR Dynamic Simulation Modeling Emerging Good Practices Task Force. , 2015, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[12]  Richard J. Zeckhauser,et al.  Critical ratios and efficient allocation , 1973 .

[13]  Praveen Thokala,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds: the Past, the Present and the Future , 2018, PharmacoEconomics.

[14]  M Stevenson,et al.  Simulation optimisation of Treatment Sequences for Rheumatoid arthritis. , 2015, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[15]  Brian T. Denton,et al.  Markov decision processes for screening and treatment of chronic diseases , 2017 .

[16]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Applying dynamic simulation modeling methods in health care delivery research-the SIMULATE checklist: report of the ISPOR simulation modeling emerging good practices task force. , 2015, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[17]  C. Castillo-Chavez,et al.  Global stability of an age-structure model for TB and its applications to optimal vaccination strategies. , 1998, Mathematical biosciences.

[18]  Eva K. Lee,et al.  Operations Research Advances Cancer Therapeutics , 2008, Interfaces.

[19]  Alec Morton,et al.  STAR—People-Powered Prioritization , 2014, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[20]  M. Ehrgott,et al.  Beam selection in radiotherapy design , 2008 .

[21]  Mustafa Y. Sir,et al.  Multi-objective simulation optimization using data envelopment analysis and genetic algorithm: Specific application to determining optimal resource levels in surgical services , 2013 .

[22]  William Hollingworth,et al.  Model Transparency and Validation , 2012, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[23]  P. Vemer,et al.  AdViSHE: A Validation-Assessment Tool of Health-Economic Models for Decision Makers and Model Users , 2015, PharmacoEconomics.

[24]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Constrained Optimization Methods in Health Services Research-An Introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR Optimization Methods Emerging Good Practices Task Force. , 2017, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[25]  Oguzhan Alagöz,et al.  Optimal Breast Biopsy Decision-Making Based on Mammographic Features and Demographic Factors , 2010, Oper. Res..

[26]  Stephen Relyea,et al.  An Analytics Approach to Designing Combination Chemotherapy Regimens for Cancer , 2016, Manag. Sci..

[27]  Eva K. Lee,et al.  Disease Diagnosis: Optimization-Based Methods , 2009, Encyclopedia of Optimization.

[28]  Paolo Toth,et al.  Knapsack Problems: Algorithms and Computer Implementations , 1990 .

[29]  Andrew J. Schaefer,et al.  The Optimal Time to Initiate HIV Therapy Under Ordered Health States , 2008, Oper. Res..

[30]  Dimitris Bertsimas,et al.  Fairness, Efficiency, and Flexibility in Organ Allocation for Kidney Transplantation , 2013, Oper. Res..

[31]  Martin L. Puterman,et al.  Markov Decision Processes: Discrete Stochastic Dynamic Programming , 1994 .

[32]  Eva K. Lee,et al.  Vaccine Prioritization for Effective Pandemic Response , 2015, Interfaces.