Why Are Phenotypic Mutation Rates Much Higher Than Genotypic Mutation Rates?

The evolution of genotypic mutation rates has been investigated in numerous theoretical and experimental studies. Mutations, however, occur not only when copying DNA, but also when building the phenotype, especially when translating and transcribing DNA to RNA and protein. Here we study the effect of such phenotypic mutations. We find a maximum phenotypic mutation rate, umax, that is compatible with maintaining a certain function of the organism. This may be called a phenotypic error threshold. In particular, we find a minimum phenotypic mutation rate, umin, with the property that there is (nearly) no selection pressure to reduce the rate of phenotypic mutations below this value. If there is a cost for lowering the phenotypic mutation rate, then umin is close to the optimum phenotypic mutation rate that maximizes the fitness of the organism. In our model, there is selective pressure to decrease the rate of genotypic mutations to zero, but to decrease the rate of phenotypic mutations only to a positive value. Despite its simplicity, our model can explain part of the huge difference between genotypic and phenotypic mutation rates that is observed in nature. The relevant data are summarized.

[1]  C Cruz,et al.  Genetic studies of the lac repressor. XIV. Analysis of 4000 altered Escherichia coli lac repressors reveals essential and non-essential residues, as well as "spacers" which do not require a specific sequence. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  L. Loeb,et al.  On the fidelity of transcription by Escherichia coli ribonucleic acid polymerase. , 1975, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  Colin J. Thompson,et al.  On Eigen's theory of the self-organization of matter and the evolution of biological macromolecules , 1974 .

[4]  A. Sturtevant Essays on Evolution. I. On the Effects of Selection on Mutation Rate , 1937, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[5]  M. Lynch,et al.  TOWARD A REALISTIC MODEL OF MUTATIONS AFFECTING FITNESS , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[6]  P. Keightley,et al.  Perspectives Anecdotal , Historical and Critical Commentaries on Genetics , 1999 .

[7]  S. Bouvier,et al.  Systematic mutation of bacteriophage T4 lysozyme. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  Christopher T. Saunders,et al.  Evaluation of structural and evolutionary contributions to deleterious mutation prediction. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  W. Gilbert,et al.  ISOLATION OF THE LAC REPRESSOR , 1966, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  P. O’Farrell High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. , 1975, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[11]  T. Johnson,et al.  The evolution of mutation rates: separating causes from consequences , 2000, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[12]  M. Eigen,et al.  The Hypercycle: A principle of natural self-organization , 2009 .

[13]  D. Söll,et al.  Quality control mechanisms during translation. , 1999, Science.

[14]  Marianne Manchester,et al.  Complete mutagenesis of the HIV-1 protease , 1989, Nature.

[15]  Nicholas D Bonawitz,et al.  Use of an in Vivo Reporter Assay to Test for Transcriptional and Translational Fidelity in Yeast* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[16]  J. Gallant,et al.  Mistranslation in E. coli , 1977, Cell.

[17]  D. K. Hawley,et al.  Transcriptional Fidelity and Proofreading by RNA Polymerase II , 1998, Cell.

[18]  J. Drake,et al.  Rates of spontaneous mutation. , 1998, Genetics.

[19]  M. Eigen,et al.  The hypercycle. A principle of natural self-organization. Part A: Emergence of the hypercycle. , 1977, Die Naturwissenschaften.

[20]  J. Withey,et al.  The biological roles of trans-translation. , 2002, Current opinion in microbiology.

[21]  P. Schuster,et al.  Chance and necessity in evolution: lessons from RNA , 1998, physics/9811037.

[22]  C. S. Rupert,et al.  Analysis of photoenzymatic repair of UV lesions in DNA by single light flashes. II. In vivo studies with Escherichia coli cells and bacteriophage. , 1968, Mutation research.

[23]  J. Gallant,et al.  An estimate of the global error frequency in translation , 1982, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[24]  S. Gygi,et al.  Correlation between Protein and mRNA Abundance in Yeast , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[25]  R. Buerger The Mathematical Theory of Selection, Recombination, and Mutation , 2000 .

[26]  Peter Schuster,et al.  A principle of natural self-organization , 1977, Naturwissenschaften.

[27]  U. Alon,et al.  Optimality and evolutionary tuning of the expression level of a protein , 2005, Nature.