Quantity Flexibility Contracts and Supply Chain Performance

The Quantity Flexibility (QF) contract is a method for coordinating materials and infor- mation flows in supply chains operating under rolling-horizon planning. It stipulates a maximum percentage revision each element of the period-by-period replenishment schedule is allowed per planning iteration. The supplier is obligated to cover any requests that remain within the upside limits. The bounds on reductions are a form of minimum purchase commitment which discourages the customer from overstating its needs. While QF contracts are being implemented in industrial practice, the academic literature has thus far had little guidance to offer a firm interested in structuring its supply relationships in this way. This paper seeks to address this need, by developing rigorous conclusions about the behavioral consequences of QF contracts, and hence about the implications for the performance and design of supply chains with linkages possessing this structure. Issues explored include the impact of system flexibility on inventory characteristics and the patterns by which forecast and order variability propagate along the supply chain. The ultimate goal is to provide insights as to where to position flexibility for the greatest benefit, and how much to pay for it.

[1]  Ravi Anupindi,et al.  Analysis of supply contracts with total minimum commitment , 1997 .

[2]  U. Karmarkar Getting control of just-in-time. , 1989, Harvard business review.

[3]  John F. Magee,et al.  Production planning and inventory control , 1958 .

[4]  Ananth V. Iyer,et al.  Quick Response in Manufacturer-Retailer Channels , 1997 .

[5]  M. Bergen,et al.  Agency Relationships in Marketing: A Review of the Implications and Applications of Agency and Related Theories , 1992 .

[6]  Evan L. Porteus,et al.  Chapter 7.( TGM) Supply Contracts with Quantity Commitments and Stochastic Demand by Ravi Annupindi & Yehuda Bassok Chapter 8. ( TGM) Supply Chain Contracting and Coordination with Stochastic Demand , 1996 .

[7]  Scott E. Masten,et al.  Efficient Adaptation in Long-term Contracts: Take-or-Pay Provisions for Natural Gas , 1985 .

[8]  Ralph A. Winter,et al.  An Economic Theory of Vertical Restraints , 1984 .

[9]  D. Heath,et al.  Modelling the evolution of demand forecasts with application to safety stock analysis in production distribution systems , 1994 .

[10]  Michael L. Katz,et al.  Vertical contractual relations , 1989 .

[11]  A. Ackere The principal/agent paradigm: Its relevance to various functional fields , 1993 .

[12]  W. Lovejoy Stopped Myopic Policies in Some Inventory Models with Generalized Demand Processes , 1992 .

[13]  Fangruo Chen Decentralized supply chains subject to information delays , 1999 .

[14]  S. Gilbert,et al.  Note. the Role of Returns Policies in Pricing and Inventory Decisions for Catalogue Goods , 1998 .

[15]  Awi Federgruen,et al.  An Inventory Model with Limited Production Capacity and Uncertain Demands II. The Discounted-Cost Criterion , 1986, Math. Oper. Res..

[16]  W. Lovejoy Myopic policies for some inventory models with uncertain demand distributions , 1990 .

[17]  S. Tayur Computing the Optimal Policy for Capacitated Inventory Models , 1993 .

[18]  K. R. Baker,et al.  The dynamics of hedging the master schedule , 1986 .

[19]  Seungjin Whang,et al.  Coordination in operations: A taxonomy , 1995 .

[20]  Bruce L. Miller,et al.  Scarf's State Reduction Method, Flexibility, and a Dependent Demand Inventory Model , 1986, Oper. Res..

[21]  Eugene Kandel The Right to Return , 1996, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[22]  Jeffrey Miller Hedging the master schedule , 1979 .

[23]  Gwilym M. Jenkins,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1972 .

[24]  Ananth V. Iyer,et al.  Backup agreements in fashion buying—the value of upstream flexibility , 1997 .

[25]  Katy S. Azoury Bayes Solution to Dynamic Inventory Models Under Unknown Demand Distribution , 1985 .

[26]  K. Moorthy,et al.  Comment---Managing Channel Profits: Comment , 1987 .

[27]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Dynamic Programming and Stochastic Control , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.