OBJECTIVE: To measure patient preferences for four different screening strategies: annual fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) alone; flexible sigmoidoscopy (FSIG) every 5 years alone; both annual FOBT and FSIG every 5 years; or no screening.DESIGN: Survey.SETTING: University internal medicine clinic.PATIENTS: Convenience sample of 146 adults (aged 50–75 years) with no previous history of colon cancer.INTERVENTION: Three-part educational program on colon cancer screening administered verbally by trained research assistants.MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patient preferences for screening were measured at three points: after descriptive information about colon cancer and screening options (testing procedure information); after information about test performance but with no out-of-pocket costs (test performance information); and finally with hypothetical out-of-pocket costs (cost information). After only descriptive test information, the most popular strategies were FOBT alone (45%) or both tests (38%). Fewer patients preferred FSIG alone (13%). After information about test performance, more subjects preferred both tests (47%), and fewer subjects preferred FOBT alone (36%) (p=.12). With hypothetical out-of-pocket costs, the proportion preferring FOBT alone increased to 53%, while those preferring both tests decreased to 31% (p<.001). Less than 5% of patients preferred no screening.CONCLUSIONS: Patient preferences for colon cancer screening were modestly sensitive to information about test performance and strongly sensitive to out-of-pocket costs. The heterogeneity of patients’ preferences for how to be screened supports informed shared decision making as a possible means of improving colon cancer screening.
[1]
G. Friedman,et al.
A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer.
,
1992,
The New England journal of medicine.
[2]
S. Moss,et al.
Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer
,
1989,
The Lancet.
[3]
C. Charles,et al.
Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango).
,
1997,
Social science & medicine.
[4]
J. Olsen,et al.
Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test
,
1996,
The Lancet.
[5]
A Coulter,et al.
Sharing decisions with patients: is the information good enough?
,
1999,
BMJ.
[6]
S. Winawer,et al.
Screening for colon cancer.
,
1976,
Gastroenterology.
[7]
T G Ganiats,et al.
Patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening.
,
1996,
The Journal of family practice.
[8]
David Haber,et al.
Guide to clinical preventive services: a challenge to physician resourcefulness
,
1993
.
[9]
L M Schuman,et al.
Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study.
,
1993,
The New England journal of medicine.
[10]
C. Mulrow,et al.
Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale.
,
1997,
Gastroenterology.