The in-group ritual of self-denigration in Iranian doctoral defense sessions: applied linguists’ attitudes, functions and perceptions in focus

Abstract Drawing on a Symbolic Interactionist perspective and the Grounded Theory methodology, this study aimed to explore self-denigration from the perspective of Iranian applied linguists highlighting the significance of self-denigration as an in-group relational ritual in Iranian doctoral defense sessions. The data were obtained from rigorous coding of the transcripts of two focus groups and a questionnaire built on the findings of the focus group discussions. The findings indicated significant gender differences in terms of the participants’ attitudes toward the functions and meanings of self-denigration. Academic experience was also found to be an important factor in how the participants perceived self-denigration. Through a meticulous analysis of self-denigration in doctoral defense sessions, the present study sheds light on the norms and conventions of the academic discourse of defense sessions, thereby justifying the rights and obligations of the defense session participants.

[1]  A. Jalilifar,et al.  Self-denigration in academic discourse , 2022, Functions of language.

[2]  A. Jalilifar,et al.  Referral for re-submission: Scholarly Expectations of EFL Applied Linguistics Doctoral Defense Sessions , 2022, European Journal of Applied Linguistics.

[3]  D. Kádár,et al.  Self-Denigration in 21st Century Chinese , 2020 .

[4]  Thorsten Huth Interaction, Language Use, and Second Language Teaching , 2020, Interaction, Language Use, and Second Language Teaching.

[5]  Ruth E. Page University of Birmingham Self-denigration and the mixed messages of 'ugly' selfies in Instagram , 2019 .

[6]  Siti Zaidah Zainuddin,et al.  Hedging Functions in Malaysian Doctoral Candidature Defense Sessions , 2019, SAGE Open.

[7]  Vaia Doudaki Analysing discourse , 2019, Discourses of Legitimation in the News.

[8]  S. Speer Reconsidering self‐deprecation as a communication practice , 2019, The British journal of social psychology.

[9]  F. Sharifian Cultural Linguistics: Cultural conceptualisations and language , 2017 .

[10]  A. Izadi Mixed messages in criticisms in Iranian PhD dissertation defenses , 2017 .

[11]  M. Alicke,et al.  My worst faults and misdeeds: Self-criticism and self-enhancement can co-exist* , 2017 .

[12]  Myung-Hee Kim Why self-deprecating? Achieving ‘oneness’ in conversation , 2014 .

[13]  Geoffrey Leech,et al.  The Pragmatics of Politeness , 2014 .

[14]  Z. M. Don,et al.  Interactionally achieving face in criticism–criticism response exchanges , 2013 .

[15]  Changrong Yu Two interactional functions of self-mockery in everyday English conversations: A multimodal analysis , 2013 .

[16]  Z. M. Don,et al.  Relational connection and separation in Iranian dissertation defences , 2011 .

[17]  R. Arundale Constituting face in conversation: Face, facework, and interactional achievement , 2010 .

[18]  Jennifer Hay,et al.  The pragmatics of humor support , 2001 .

[19]  Akiko Kawasaki,et al.  Universals of linguistic politeness: Quantitative evidence from Japanese and American english , 1986 .

[20]  E. Goffman The Interaction Order: American Sociological Association, 1982 Presidential Address , 1983 .

[21]  A. Jalilifar,et al.  Self-Denigration in Doctoral Defense Sessions: Scale Development and Validation , 2022, ESP Today.

[22]  Ian Walkinshaw,et al.  Self-denigration as a relational strategy in lingua franca talk: Asian English speakers , 2019, Journal of Pragmatics.

[23]  S. Dobson Assessing the Viva in Higher Education , 2018 .

[24]  A. Izadi Culture-generality and culture-specificity of face: Insights from argumentative talk in Iranian dissertation defenses , 2017 .

[25]  Javad Zare Self-mockery: A study of Persian multi-party interactions , 2016 .

[26]  D. Kádár Relational Rituals and Communication , 2013 .

[27]  F. Sharifian The Persian cultural schema of shekasteh-nafsi : A study of compliment responses in Persian and Anglo-Australian speakers , 2005 .

[28]  Leonardo Juliano Recski,et al.  Interpersonal engagement in academic spoken discourse: a functional account of dissertation defenses , 2005 .

[29]  B. Fraser,et al.  The association of deference with linguistic form , 1981 .