AbstractProficiency testing is an external quality control check, whereby the quality of an analytical result is checked against criteria that are set independently of the laboratory carrying out the analysis. Participants in a proficiency test are encouraged to use the method of their choice to determine the analyte in question. The collated results submitted by the participants are used to derive the best estimate of the ‘true’ level, or assigned value, of the analyte, as a consensus value of the whole data set. Generally, the data submitted will be normally distributed and from a single population, but if a data set is found to be multimodal, then the selection of one of the modes as the assigned value is possible where there is supporting data, typically methodology information. Unless there are independent grounds for preferring one mode over another, it is not possible to set an assigned value or calculate z-scores. However, the analysis of allergens has presented proficiency testers with a new challenge, since it has become apparent that quantitative results may be dependent on the brand of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit used, the specific analyte targeted (e.g. total content or allergen protein content) and the limit of detection achievable. FAPAS® has run more than 40 proficiency tests for allergen analysis over the past 7 years, during which time methods have been developed and improved and the requirements for determination of food ingredient allergens has increased. Two case studies are presented which highlight some of the issues around the use of allergen measurement methods.
FigureA selection of food items which might cause allergenic or intolerance reactions
[1]
E Anklam,et al.
Methods for allergen analysis in food: a review
,
2004,
Food additives and contaminants.
[2]
Michael Thompson,et al.
Recent trends in inter-laboratory precision at ppb and sub-ppb concentrations in relation to fitness for purpose criteria in proficiency testing
,
2000
.
[3]
K. Grimshaw,et al.
The impact of government advice to pregnant mothers regarding peanut avoidance on the prevalence of peanut allergy in United Kingdom children at school entry.
,
2007,
The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.
[4]
S. Matthews,et al.
Cohort study of peanut and tree nut sensitisation by age of 4 years
,
1996,
BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[5]
Michael Thompson,et al.
Bump-hunting for the proficiency tester--searching for multimodality.
,
2002,
The Analyst.
[6]
T Fearn,et al.
A new test for 'sufficient homogeneity'.
,
2001,
The Analyst.
[7]
Michael Thompson,et al.
The International Harmonized Protocol for the proficiency testing of analytical chemistry laboratories (IUPAC Technical Report)
,
2006
.
[8]
J. Norris.
Current status and prospects for the use of optical fibres in chemical analysis. A review
,
1989
.
[9]
Leonard Steinborn,et al.
International Organization for Standardization ISO/IEC 17025 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories
,
2004
.