Scene matching using F-histogram-based features with possibilistic C-means optimization

This paper outlines further advances from initial findings previously reported in [O. Sjahputera, J.M. Keller, Possibilistic C-means in scene matching, Fourth Internat. Conf. of the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology (EUSFLAT), 2005, pp. 669-675]. We propose a scene matching approach based on spatial relationships among objects in the images to determine if two images acquired under different viewing conditions capture the same scene. This is a difficult problem in computer vision. Our approach produces a mapping of objects from one view to the other, and recovers the viewing transformation parameters. The core of the system relies on capturing spatial relationship information through Force Histograms as affine-invariant image descriptors. Object mapping across images is performed by finding the best correspondence map (FMAP) between force histograms in the two images. The major problem is that the number of potential FMAPs is large, even for modest numbers of scene objects. Hence, search optimization is required. The correct FMAP contains histogram correspondences represented by similar feature vectors. Therefore, dense regions in the feature space are suspected to contain these vectors. Possibilistic C-means (PCM) clustering is used to find these dense regions. The centroids of these dense regions are used to generate the FMAPs. Previously, the FMAP was generated using a nearest-neighbor like approach. In this study, we propose an improved version of this method by incorporating fuzzy memberships into the FMAP building process. Here, the fitness of FMAP candidates are assessed with respect to all histogram correspondences already in FMAP, not just from an initial seed point alone. The best FMAP is selected and translated into a mapping scheme that connects the objects in the two images.

[1]  Joon Hee Han,et al.  Contour Matching Using Epipolar Geometry , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[2]  David Marr,et al.  VISION A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information , 2009 .

[3]  James M. Keller,et al.  The possibilistic C-means algorithm: insights and recommendations , 1996, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[4]  Ozy Sjahputera,et al.  Object registration in scene matching based on spatial relationships , 2004 .

[5]  Possibilistic C-Means in Scene Matching , 2005, EUSFLAT Conf..

[6]  P. Matsakis,et al.  The use of force histograms for affine-invariant relative position description , 2004 .

[7]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms , 1981, Advanced Applications in Pattern Recognition.

[8]  Ozy Sjahputera,et al.  Particle swarm over scene matching , 2005, Proceedings 2005 IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium, 2005. SIS 2005..

[9]  Anca L. Ralescu,et al.  Spatial organization in 2D segmented images: representation and recognition of primitive spatial relations , 1994, CVPR 1994.

[10]  Laurent Wendling,et al.  A New Way to Represent the Relative Position between Areal Objects , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[11]  James M. Keller,et al.  A possibilistic approach to clustering , 1993, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[12]  Ozy Sjahputera,et al.  Linguistic description of relative positions in images , 2001, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[13]  Paul D. Gader,et al.  LADAR scene description using fuzzy morphology and rules , 1999, Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Computer Vision Beyond the Visible Spectrum: Methods and Applications (CVBVS'99).

[14]  James M. Keller,et al.  Scene matching by spatial relationships , 2003, 22nd International Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, NAFIPS 2003.

[15]  Lisa M. Brown,et al.  A survey of image registration techniques , 1992, CSUR.

[16]  Paul D. Gader,et al.  Histogram-based scene matching measures , 2000, PeachFuzz 2000. 19th International Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society - NAFIPS (Cat. No.00TH8500).

[17]  D. Casasent,et al.  Position, rotation, and scale invariant optical correlation. , 1976, Applied optics.

[18]  B. N. Chatterji,et al.  An FFT-based technique for translation, rotation, and scale-invariant image registration , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..