How Does Technology-Enabled Active Learning Affect Undergraduate Students' Understanding of Electromagnetism Concepts?

Educational technology supports meaningful learning and enables the presentation of spatial and dynamic images, which portray relationships among complex concepts. The Technology-Enabled Active Learning (TEAL) Project at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) involves media-rich software for simulation and visualization in freshman physics carried out in a specially redesigned classroom to facilitate group interaction. These technology-based learning materials are especially useful in electromagnetism to help students conceptualize phenomena and processes. This study analyzes the effects of the unique learning environment of the TEAL project on students' cognitive and affective outcomes. The assessment of the project included examining students' conceptual understanding before and after studying electromagnetism in a media-rich environment. We also investigated the effect of this environment on students' preferences regarding the various teaching methods. As part of the project, we developed pre- and posttests consisting of conceptual questions from standardized tests, as well as questions designed to assess the effect of visualizations and experiments. The research population consisted of 811 undergraduate students. It consisted of a small- and a large-scale experimental groups and a control group. TEAL students improved their conceptual understanding of the subject matter to a significantly higher extent than their control group peers. A majority of the students in the small-scale experiment noted that they would recommend the TEAL course to fellow students, indicating the benefits of interactivity, visualization, and hands-on experiments, which the technology helped enable. In the large-scale implementation students expressed both positive and negative attitudes in the course survey.

[1]  Ronald K. Thornton,et al.  Enhancing and Evaluating Students’ Learning of Motion Concepts , 1992 .

[2]  Uri Ganiel,et al.  Macroscopic phenomena and microscopic processes: Student understanding of transients in direct current electric circuits , 1999 .

[3]  H. Feigl,et al.  Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science , 1956 .

[4]  Lucia Mason,et al.  Introducing talk and writing for conceptual change: a classroom study , 2001 .

[5]  David P Maloney,et al.  Surveying students’ conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism , 2001 .

[6]  J. Bruer.  Schools for Thought: A Science of Learning in the Classroom , 1993 .

[7]  Bruce A. Sherwood,et al.  3-D visualization of fields , 1997 .

[8]  John W. Belcher,et al.  MIT educators share success , 2001, COMG.

[9]  John W. Belcher,et al.  Field line motion in classical electromagnetism , 2003 .

[10]  Peter W. Hewson,et al.  Analysis and Use of a Task for Identifying Conceptions of Teaching Science , 1989 .

[11]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  A Web-Based Chemistry Course as a Means To Foster Freshmen Learning , 2003 .

[12]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  From Nationwide Standardized Testing to School-Based Alternative Embedded Assessment in Israel: Students' Performance in the Matriculation 2000 Project , 2003 .

[13]  Bat-Sheva Eylon,et al.  Macro‐micro relationships: the missing link between electrostatics and electrodynamics in students’ reasoning , 1990 .

[14]  Leonhard E. Bernold,et al.  Case study of the physics component of an integrated curriculum , 1999 .

[15]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Millikan Lecture 1990: What we teach and what is learned—Closing the gap , 1991 .

[16]  R. Clark.  Media will never influence learning , 1994 .

[17]  John O'Malley,et al.  Students Perceptions of Distance Learning, Online Learning and the Traditional Classroom , 1999 .

[18]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Growth of Logical Thinking , 1959 .

[19]  Rodney C. Cross.  Magnetic lines of force and rubber bands , 1989 .

[20]  Fabio Bevilacqua,et al.  The history of physics and European physics education , 1996 .

[21]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Constructivism and computer‐mediated communication in distance education , 1995 .

[22]  Bruce A. Sherwood,et al.  Electric & magnetic interactions , 2002 .

[23]  Priscilla W. Laws,et al.  Calculus‐Based Physics Without Lectures , 1991 .

[24]  John W. Belcher,et al.  Technology active learning , 2003 .

[25]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  The Practice of constructivism in science education , 1993 .

[26]  Jenaro Guisasola,et al.  Difficulties in learning the concept of electric field , 1998 .

[27]  P. Fishbane,et al.  Physics for scientists and engineers : with modern physics , 2005 .

[28]  J. Roschelle.  Learning by Collaborating: Convergent Conceptual Change , 1992 .

[29]  Roger Osborne,et al.  Learning in science , 1985 .

[30]  James D. Slotta,et al.  Understanding constraint-based processes: A precursor to conceptual change in physics , 1996 .

[31]  J. Dewey.  The School and Society , 2019 .

[32]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom , 2006 .

[33]  Arthur I. Miller.  Book-Review - Imagery in Scientific thought - Creating 20TH-CENTURY Physics , 1984 .

[34]  B. White.  ThinkerTools: Causal Models, Conceptual Change, and Science Education , 1993 .

[35]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  International handbook of science education , 1998 .

[36]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  Virtual and Physical Molecular Modeling: Fostering Model Perception and Spatial Understanding , 2001, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[37]  Ernst von Glasersfeld,et al.  The Construction of Knowledge, Contributions to Conceptual Semantics. , 1987 .

[38]  D. Perkins,et al.  Individual and Social Aspects of Learning , 1998 .

[39]  Richard A. Duschl,et al.  Conceptual Change in Science and in the Learning of Science , 1998 .

[40]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity , 1992 .

[41]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Conceptual Change within and across Ontological Categories: Examples from Learning and Discovery in Science , 1992 .

[42]  F. Herrmann.  Energy density and stress: A new approach to teaching electromagnetism , 1989 .

[43]  Heather Brasell,et al.  The effect of real‐time laboratory graphing on learning graphic representations of distance and velocity , 1987 .

[44]  D. Perkins.  Smart Schools: From Training Memories to Educating Minds , 1992 .

[45]  Priscilla W. Laws,et al.  Women's responses to an activity‐based introductory physics program , 1995 .

[46]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  The Impact of Technology on Science Instruction: Historical Trends and Current Opportunities , 1998 .

[47]  Ronald K. Thornton,et al.  Realtime Physics: Active Learning Laboratories , 1998 .

[48]  Robert J. Beichner,et al.  Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs , 1994 .

[49]  L. Vygotsky,et al.  Thought and Language , 1963 .

[50]  D. Perkins,et al.  Partners in Cognition: Extending Human Intelligence with Intelligent Technologies , 1991 .

[51]  H. Niemi.  Active learning—a cultural change needed in teacher education and schools , 2002 .

[52]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Inquiry Based Science Supported by Technology: Achievement among Urban Middle School Students. , 2000 .

[53]  Ronald K. Thornton,et al.  Evaluating innovation in studio physics , 1999 .

[54]  R. Hake.  Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .

[55]  Vicente Mellado,et al.  The classroom practice of preservice teachers and their conceptions of teaching and learning science , 1998 .

[56]  John King,et al.  ZAP! freshman electricity and magnetism using desktop experiments: A progress report , 1992 .

[57]  D. Treagust,et al.  Learning in Science — From Behaviourism Towards Social Constructivism and Beyond , 1998 .

[58]  Paul Black.  Assessment and Feedback in Science Education. , 1995 .

[59]  Roger C. Schank.  Goal-Based Scenarios: A Radical Look at Education , 1994 .

[60]  Bat-Sheva Eylon,et al.  From problem solving to a knowledge structure: An example from the domain of electromagnetism , 1997 .

[61]  Jann E. Freed,et al.  Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting the Focus from Teaching to Learning , 1999 .

[62]  Daniel C. Edelson.  Learning-for-use : A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities , 2001 .

[63]  Rodger W. Bybee,et al.  Science Curriculum: Transforming Goals to Practices , 1998 .

[64]  J. Mathewson.  Visual-spatial thinking: An aspect of science overlooked by educators , 1999 .

[65]  M. Towns,et al.  “I believe I will go out of this class actually knowing something”: Cooperative learning activities in physical chemistry , 1997 .

[66]  Menucha Birenbaum,et al.  New Insights Into Learning and Teaching and Their Implications for Assessment , 2003 .

[67]  L. West,et al.  Cognitive Structure and Conceptual Change , 1985 .

[68]  Lev Vygotsky.  Mind in society , 1978 .

[69]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  Formal and informal collaborative projects: Engaging in industry with environmental awareness , 2000 .

[70]  Marcia W. Keyser,et al.  Active learning and cooperative learning: understanding the difference and using both styles effectively , 2000 .

[71]  E. Soloway,et al.  Creating Usable Innovations in Systemic Reform: Scaling Up Technology-Embedded Project-Based Science in Urban Schools , 2000 .

[72]  Peter S. Shaffer,et al.  Tutorials in Introductory Physics , 1998 .

[73]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Computers as mindtools for engaging learners in critical thinking , 1998 .

[74]  Horst P. Schecker,et al.  Integration of Experimenting and Modelling by Advanced Educational Technology: Examples from Nuclear Physics , 1998 .

[75]  Ronald K. Thornton,et al.  Learning motion concepts using real‐time microcomputer‐based laboratory tools , 1990 .