Optimisation of support stiffness at railway crossings

ABSTRACT Turnouts are a key element of the railway system. They are also the part of the system with the highest number of degradation modes and associated failures. There are a number of reasons for this, including high dynamic loads resulting from non-uniform rail geometry and track support stiffness. The main aim of this study is to propose a methodology to optimise the pad stiffness along a crossing panel in order to achieve a decrease in the indicators of the most common failure modes. A three-dimensional vehicle/track interaction model has been established, considering a detailed description of the crossing panel support structure. A genetic algorithm has been applied to two main types of constructions, namely direct and indirect fixing, to find the optimum combinations of resilient pad characteristics for various cases of travelling direction, travelling speed and support conditions.

[1]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Safety-based Maintenance for Geometry Restoration of Railway Turnout Systems in Various Operational Environments , 2016 .

[2]  William Powrie,et al.  Measuring the area and number of ballast particle contacts at sleeper/ballast and ballast/subgrade interfaces , 2015 .

[3]  Seyedahmad Jalili Hassankiadeh.  Failure analysis of railway switches and crossings for the purpose of preventive maintenance. , 2011 .

[5]  H. Hertz.  Ueber die Berührung fester elastischer Körper. , 1882 .

[6]  J. R. Evans,et al.  Optimising the wheel/rail interface on a modern urban rail system , 2008 .

[7]  Jens C. O. Nielsen,et al.  Simulation of dynamic interaction between train and railway turnout , 2006 .

[8]  Jens C. O. Nielsen,et al.  Geometry and stiffness optimization for switches and crossings, and simulation of material degradation , 2010 .

[9]  Sato Yoshihiko,et al.  Japanese Studies on Deterioration of Ballasted Track , 1995 .

[10]  I. Y. Shevtsov,et al.  Optimisation of the elastic track properties of turnout crossings , 2016 .

[11]  J. K. Hedrick,et al.  A Comparison of Alternative Creep Force Models for Rail Vehicle Dynamic Analysis , 1983 .

[12]  V. Markine,et al.  Combatting RCF on switch points by tuning elastic track properties , 2011 .

[13]  Anders Ekberg,et al.  INNOTRACK: Concluding technical report , 2010 .

[14]  Jens C. O. Nielsen,et al.  Dynamic vehicle–track interaction in switches and crossings and the influence of rail pad stiffness – field measurements and validation of a simulation model , 2015 .

[15]  S. Brunia,et al.  Effects of train impacts on urban turnouts : Modelling and validation through measurements , 2009 .

[16]  Yann Bezin,et al.  Optimization of support stiffness at a railway crossing panel , 2016 .

[17]  Nathalie Guerin,et al.  Approche expérimentale et numérique du comportement du ballast des voies ferrées , 1996 .

[18]  D Lyon,et al.  THE EFFECT OF TRACK AND VEHICLE PARAMETERS ON WHEEL/RAIL VERTICAL DYNAMIC FORCES , 1974 .