Development of complex products and production strategies using a multi-objective conceptual design approach

Conceptual design is a fundamental phase for developing optimal product configurations. During conceptual design, the degree of freedom in engineering choices can propose optimal solutions in terms of assembly, manufacturing, cost and material selection. Nevertheless, in current industrial practices, each aspect is analysed independently and a guided decision-making approach based on multi-objective criteria is missing. Multi-objective analysis is a way of combining each production aspect with the aim of choosing the best design option. The goal of this research work is to define a multi-objective design approach for the determination of optimal and feasible design options during the conceptual design phase. The approach is based on the concept of functional basis, module heuristics for defining product modules and the theory of multi-criteria decision-making for mathematical assessment of the best design option. The novelty of this approach lies in making the design process, currently based on company know-how and experience, systematic. A complex product (i.e. tool-holder carousel of a computer numerical control machine tool) is the case study used to assess the economic sustainability of different design options and to validate the proposed design workflow in a real manufacturing context. Different product modules have been re-designed and prototyped for comparing the assemblability, manufacturability and cost of the design solutions.

[1]  P. Radhakrishnan,et al.  An integrated approach to design for manufacturing and assembly based on reduction of product development time and cost , 2009 .

[2]  Sanchoy K. Das,et al.  DFQM - an approach for improving the quality of assembled products , 2000 .

[3]  Michele Germani,et al.  A method to optimize assemblability of industrial product in early design phase: from product architecture to assembly sequence , 2012 .

[4]  Ali Siadat,et al.  Integrated product-process design to suggest appropriate manufacturing technology: a review , 2017 .

[5]  Zhongliang Yue,et al.  An extended TOPSIS for determining weights of decision makers with interval numbers , 2011, Knowl. Based Syst..

[6]  Brigitte Moench,et al.  Engineering Design A Systematic Approach , 2016 .

[7]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering , 2004 .

[8]  Tien-Chin Wang,et al.  Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[9]  Hoda A. ElMaraghy,et al.  Best design granularity to balance assembly complexity and product modularity , 2017 .

[10]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[11]  Bimal Nepal,et al.  PRODUCT MODULARIZATION CONSIDERING COST AND MANUFACTURABILITY OF MODULES , 2008 .

[12]  Hsuan-Shih Lee,et al.  Generalizing TOPSIS for fuzzy multiple-criteria group decision-making , 2007, Comput. Math. Appl..

[13]  K. Narayana Rao,et al.  Multi-objective optimization approach for cost management during product design at the conceptual phase , 2014 .

[14]  Ali Mohammadi,et al.  Introducing A New Method To Expand TOPSIS Decision Making Model To Fuzzy TOPSIS , 2011 .

[15]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[16]  H. S. Byun,et al.  A decision support system for the selection of a rapid prototyping process using the modified TOPSIS method , 2005 .

[17]  Shankar Chakraborty,et al.  Applications of the MOORA method for decision making in manufacturing environment , 2011 .

[18]  Wankhade Nitesh Prakash,et al.  NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT BY DFMA AND RAPID PROTOTYPING , 2014 .

[19]  M. Yurdakul,et al.  Application of correlation test to criteria selection for multi criteria decision making (MCDM) models , 2009 .

[20]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  A heuristic method for identifying modules for product architectures , 2000 .

[21]  C. D. Naiju,et al.  Early Cost Estimate of Product during Design Stage Using Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DFMA) Principles , 2012 .

[22]  Daniel E. Whitney,et al.  Design-specific approach to design for assembly (DFA) for complex mechanical assemblies , 1999, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[23]  Antonio Fiorentino.  Cost drivers-based method for machining and assembly cost estimations in mould manufacturing , 2014 .

[24]  Geoffrey Boothroyd,et al.  Product design for manufacture and assembly , 1994, Comput. Aided Des..

[25]  Michele Germani,et al.  Design for Manufacturing and Assembly vs. Design to Cost: Toward a Multi-objective Approach for Decision-making Strategies During Conceptual Design of Complex Products , 2016 .

[26]  Gül E. Okudan Kremer,et al.  A systematic literature review of modular product design (MPD) from the perspective of sustainability , 2016 .

[27]  M. Yurdakul,et al.  Analysis of the benefit generated by using fuzzy numbers in a TOPSIS model developed for machine tool selection problems , 2009 .

[28]  M. S. Parvez,et al.  Integrated manufacturing features and Design-for-manufacture guidelines for reducing product cost under CAD/CAM environment , 2013, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[29]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[30]  K. L. Edwards,et al.  Towards more strategic product design for manufacture and assembly: priorities for concurrent engineering , 2002 .

[31]  Daniel A. McAdams,et al.  Memic: An Interactive Morphological Matrix Tool for Automated Concept Generation , 2008 .

[32]  Kevin Otto,et al.  Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development , 2000 .

[33]  Jian S. Dai,et al.  Product Cost Estimation: Technique Classification and Methodology Review , 2006 .

[34]  Johan Ölvander,et al.  A computerized optimization framework for the morphological matrix applied to aircraft conceptual design , 2009, Comput. Aided Des..