The contribution of auditory feedback to corrective movements in vowel formant trajectories

How much does auditory feedback shape the trajectory of a spoken utterance? When auditory feedback is altered experimentally, speakers make compensatory vocal adjustments that serve to correct for the alteration. However, it is unclear to what degree the sound of one’s own voice is used to guide speech movements in more natural contexts. In this study, we compared the formant trajectories of monosyllabic words spoken in different levels of masking noise. Spoken vowels exhibited a “centering” effect in which formants that started out at the periphery moved to the center (median) with time. This effect occurred across all speakers and all noise conditions, although it was greatest in quiet and smallest in masking noise, when auditory feedback was not available. This finding suggests that auditory feedback substantially contributes to an ongoing corrective process in natural speech, although it is not the sole driver of vowel centering.

[1]  Jay J Bauer,et al.  Vocal responses to unanticipated perturbations in voice loudness feedback: an automatic mechanism for stabilizing voice amplitude. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Jason A. Tourville,et al.  Neural mechanisms underlying auditory feedback control of speech , 2008, NeuroImage.

[3]  C. Larson,et al.  Voice F0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  F. Guenther,et al.  Prosodic adaptations to pitch perturbation in running speech. , 2011, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[5]  Douglas D. O'Shaughnessy,et al.  Speech communication : human and machine , 1987 .

[6]  V. Gracco,et al.  Perceptual recalibration of speech sounds following speech motor learning. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  F. Guenther,et al.  Vowel Category Boundaries Enhance Cortical and Behavioral Responses to Speech Feedback Alterations , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  John F. Houde,et al.  Compensatory responses to brief perturbations of speech amplitude , 2005 .

[9]  R. H. Bernacki,et al.  Effects of noise on speech production: acoustic and perceptual analyses. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Carrie Niziolek,et al.  wave_viewer: First release , 2015 .

[11]  D. Ostry,et al.  The equilibrium point hypothesis and its application to speech motor control. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[12]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  Focal Manipulations of Formant Trajectories Reveal a Role of Auditory Feedback in the Online Control of Both Within-Syllable and Between-Syllable Speech Timing , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  S. Nagarajan,et al.  What Does Motor Efference Copy Represent? Evidence from Speech Production , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  R. Patel,et al.  The influence of linguistic content on the Lombard effect. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.