Mapping rubber tree growth in mainland Southeast Asia using time-series MODIS 250 m NDVI and statistical data

Expanding global and regional markets are driving the conversion of traditional subsistence agricultural and occupied non-agricultural lands to commercial-agricultural purposes. In many parts of mainland Southeast Asia rubber plantations are expanding rapidly into areas where the crop was not historically found. Over the last several decades more than one million hectares of land have been converted to rubber trees in areas of China, Laos, Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia and Myanmar, where rubber trees were not traditionally grown. This expansion of rubber plantations has replaced ecologically important secondary forests and traditionally managed swidden fields and influenced local energy, water and carbon fluxes. Accurate and up-to-date monitoring and mapping of rubber tree growth is critical to understanding the implications of this changing ecosystem. Discriminating rubber trees from second-growth forests and fallow land has proven challenging. Previous experiments using machine-learning approaches with hard classifications on remotely sensed data, when faced with the realities of a heterogeneous plant-life mixture and high intra-class variance, have tended to overestimate the areas of rubber tree growth. Our current research sought to: 1) to investigate the potential of using a Mahalanobis typicality model to deal with mixed pixels; and 2) to explore the potential for combining MOderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) imagery with sub-national statistical data on rubber tree areas to map the distribution of rubber tree growth across this mainland Southeast Asia landscape. Our study used time-series MODIS Terra 16-day composite 250 m Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) products (MOD13Q1) acquired between March 2009 and May 2010. We used the Mahalanobis typicality method to identify pixels where rubber tree growth had the highest probability of occurring and sub-national statistical data on rubber tree growth to quantify the number of pixels of rubber tree growth mapped per administrative unit. We used Relative Operating Characteristic (ROC) and error matrix analysis, respectively, to assess the viability of Mahalanobis typicalities and to validate classification accuracy. High ROC values, over 0.8, were achieved with the Mahalanobis typicality images of both mature and young rubber trees. The proposed method greatly reduced the commission errors for the two types of rubber tree growth to 1.9% and 2.8%, respectively (corresponding to user’s accuracies of 98.1% and 97.2%, respectively). Results indicate that integrating Mahalanobis typicalities with MODIS time-series NDVI data and sub-national statistics can successfully overcome the earlier overestimation problem.

[1]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  Global land cover mapping from MODIS: algorithms and early results , 2002 .

[2]  P. Hernandez,et al.  Predicting species distributions in poorly-studied landscapes , 2008, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[3]  Hong Jiang,et al.  In‐Process Classification Assessment of Remotely Sensed Imagery , 2005 .

[4]  G. M. Foody The Continuum of Classification Fuzziness in Thematic Mapping , 1999 .

[5]  R. Gil Pontius,et al.  Land-cover change model validation by an ROC method for the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA , 2001 .

[6]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Fully-fuzzy supervised classification of sub-urban land cover from remotely sensed imagery: Statistical and artificial neural network approaches , 2001 .

[7]  Sithong Thongmanivong,et al.  Agrarian Land Use Transformation in Northern Laos: from Swidden to Rubber( Land Use Changes in the Uplands of Southeast Asia: Proximate and Distant Causes) , 2009 .

[8]  A. Belward,et al.  GLC2000: a new approach to global land cover mapping from Earth observation data , 2005 .

[9]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  Induction of Decision Trees , 1986, Machine Learning.

[10]  Charles C Mann,et al.  Addicted to rubber. , 2009, Science.

[11]  Zhe Li,et al.  Commitment and typicality measures for the Self-Organizing Map , 2010 .

[12]  F. Maselli,et al.  Estimating inter-annual crop area variation using multi-resolution satellite sensor images , 2004 .

[13]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data , 1991 .

[14]  B. Wardlow,et al.  Large-area crop mapping using time-series MODIS 250 m NDVI data: An assessment for the U.S. Central Great Plains , 2008 .

[15]  Matthew C. Hansen,et al.  Corn and Soybean Mapping in the United States Using MODIS Time‐Series Data Sets , 2007 .

[16]  Chi-Farn Chen,et al.  Monitoring of soil moisture variability in relation to rice cropping systems in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta using MODIS data , 2011 .

[17]  D. Roy,et al.  A method for integrating MODIS and Landsat data for systematic monitoring of forest cover and change in the Congo Basin , 2008 .

[18]  R. Jensen,et al.  Human/Environment Interactions, Remote Sensing, and Artificial Neural Networks: Modeling Longleaf Pine Sandhill Leaf Area and Burn History in North-Central Florida , 2004 .

[19]  Peter A. Troch,et al.  Hydrologic effects of the expansion of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) in a tropical catchment , 2010 .

[20]  C. Brodley,et al.  Decision tree classification of land cover from remotely sensed data , 1997 .

[21]  N. Campbell,et al.  Derivation and applications of probabilistic measures of class membership from the maximum-likelihood classification , 1992 .

[22]  K. Jusoff,et al.  New Approaches in Estimating Rubberwood Standing Volume Using Airborne Hyperspectral Sensing , 2009 .

[23]  J. Settle,et al.  Linear mixing and the estimation of ground cover proportions , 1993 .

[24]  Zhe Li Fuzzy ARTMAP Based Neurocomputational Spatial Uncertainty Measures , 2008 .

[25]  Hongmei Li,et al.  Past, present and future land-use in Xishuangbanna, China and the implications for carbon dynamics , 2008 .

[26]  Philip H. Page,et al.  Spatial simulation modelling of land use/land cover change scenarios in northeastern Thailand: a cellular automata approach , 2006 .

[27]  Min Cao,et al.  Demand for rubber is causing the loss of high diversity rain forest in SW China , 2007, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[28]  R. Lunetta,et al.  Land-cover change detection using multi-temporal MODIS NDVI data , 2006 .

[29]  C. Lippitt,et al.  Mapping Selective Logging in Mixed Deciduous Forest: A Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms , 2008 .

[30]  B. Wardlow,et al.  Analysis of time-series MODIS 250 m vegetation index data for crop classification in the U.S. Central Great Plains , 2007 .

[31]  Robert Gilmore Pontius,et al.  Using the Relative Operating Characteristic to Quantify Certainty in Prediction of Location of Land Cover Change in India , 2003, Trans. GIS.

[32]  T. Mitchell Aide,et al.  A scalable approach to mapping annual land cover at 250 m using MODIS time series data: A case study in the Dry Chaco ecoregion of South America , 2010 .

[33]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Hard and soft classifications by a neural network with a non-exhaustively defined set of classes , 2002 .

[34]  Jefferson Fox,et al.  Swidden Change in Southeast Asia: Understanding Causes and Consequences , 2009 .

[35]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[36]  J. Townshend,et al.  Global land cover classi(cid:142) cation at 1 km spatial resolution using a classi(cid:142) cation tree approach , 2004 .

[37]  John B. Vogler,et al.  Simulating Land-Cover Change in Montane Mainland Southeast Asia , 2012, Environmental Management.

[38]  Mustafa Turker,et al.  Sequential masking classification of multi‐temporal Landsat7 ETM+ images for field‐based crop mapping in Karacabey, Turkey , 2005 .

[39]  Andrew P. Bradley,et al.  The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms , 1997, Pattern Recognit..

[40]  R. DeFries,et al.  Classification trees: an alternative to traditional land cover classifiers , 1996 .

[41]  Zhe Li,et al.  Integrating Mahalanobis typicalities with a neural network for rubber distribution mapping , 2011 .

[42]  E. Van Ranst,et al.  Application of fuzzy logic to land suitability for rubber production in peninsular Thailand , 1996 .

[43]  R. Shrestha,et al.  Relating plant diversity to biomass and soil erosion in a cultivated landscape of the eastern seaboard region of Thailand , 2010 .

[44]  Kevin P. Price,et al.  Multitemporal, Moderate-Spatial-Resolution Remote Sensing of Modern Agricultural Production and Land Modification in the Brazilian Amazon , 2007 .

[45]  Felix Rembold,et al.  Estimation of Inter-annual Crop Area Variation by the Application of Spectral Angle Mapping to Low Resolution Multitemporal NDVI Images , 2006 .

[46]  Jane Qiu,et al.  Where the rubber meets the garden , 2009, Nature.

[47]  D. Roy,et al.  The availability of cloud-free Landsat ETM+ data over the conterminous United States and globally , 2008 .

[48]  John B. Vogler,et al.  Land-Use and Land-Cover Change in Montane Mainland Southeast Asia , 2005, Environmental management.

[49]  Jianchu Xu,et al.  The Rubber Juggernaut , 2009, Science.

[50]  J. Townshend,et al.  Detection of land cover changes using MODIS 250 m data , 2002 .

[51]  Min Cao,et al.  Impact of land use and land cover changes on ecosystem services in Menglun, Xishuangbanna, Southwest China , 2008, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[52]  R. Lefroy,et al.  Spatial identification by satellite imagery of the crop–fallow rotation cycle in northern Laos , 2009 .

[53]  J. Eastman,et al.  Bayesian Soft Classification for Sub-Pixel Analysis: A Critical Evaluation , 2002 .

[54]  A. J. W. De Wit,et al.  Efficiency and accuracy of per-field classification for operational crop mapping , 2004 .