Stabilization approaches for the hyperelastic immersed boundary method for problems of large-deformation incompressible elasticity.

The immersed boundary method is a mathematical framework for modeling fluid-structure interaction. This formulation describes the momentum, viscosity, and incompressibility of the fluid-structure system in Eulerian form, and it uses Lagrangian coordinates to describe the structural deformations, stresses, and resultant forces. Integral transforms with Dirac delta function kernels connect the Eulerian and Lagrangian frames. The fluid and the structure are both typically treated as incompressible materials. Upon discretization, however, the incompressibility of the structure is only maintained approximately. To obtain an immersed method for incompressible hyperelastic structures that is robust under large structural deformations, we introduce a volumetric energy in the solid region that stabilizes the formulation and improves the accuracy of the numerical scheme. This formulation augments the discrete Lagrange multiplier for the incompressibility constraint, thereby improving the original method's accuracy. This volumetric energy is incorporated by decomposing the strain energy into isochoric and dilatational components, as in standard solid mechanics formulations of nearly incompressible elasticity. We study the performance of the stabilized method using several quasi-static solid mechanics benchmarks, a dynamic fluid-structure interaction benchmark, and a detailed three-dimensional model of esophageal transport. The accuracy achieved by the stabilized immersed formulation is comparable to that of a stabilized finite element method for incompressible elasticity using similar numbers of structural degrees of freedom.

[1]  C. A. Saracibar,et al.  A stabilized formulation for incompressible elasticity using linear displacement and pressure interpolations , 2002 .

[2]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Element‐free Galerkin methods , 1994 .

[3]  Carlo Sansour,et al.  On the physical assumptions underlying the volumetric-isochoric split and the case of anisotropy , 2008 .

[4]  Ray W. Ogden,et al.  Instabilities and loss of ellipticity in fiber-reinforced compressible non-linearly elastic solids under plane deformation , 2003 .

[5]  Zhilin Li,et al.  A remark on jump conditions for the three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations involving an immersed moving membrane , 2001, Appl. Math. Lett..

[6]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  Hybrid finite difference/finite element immersed boundary method , 2016, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[7]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Reproducing kernel particle methods , 1995 .

[8]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Extended immersed boundary method using FEM and RKPM , 2004 .

[9]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Volumetric locking in the element free Galerkin method , 1999 .

[10]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  An adaptive, formally second order accurate version of the immersed boundary method , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[11]  Dharshi Devendran,et al.  An immersed boundary energy-based method for incompressible viscoelasticity , 2012, J. Comput. Phys..

[12]  D. Malkus,et al.  Mixed finite element methods—reduced and selective integration techniques: a unification of concepts , 1990 .

[13]  Antonio J. Gil,et al.  The Immersed Structural Potential Method for haemodynamic applications , 2010, J. Comput. Phys..

[14]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  On the Volume Conservation of the Immersed Boundary Method , 2012 .

[15]  R. Ogden,et al.  Mechanical response of fiber-reinforced incompressible non-linearly elastic solids , 2005 .

[16]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Mathematical foundations of the immersed finite element method , 2006 .

[17]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  A new family of stable elements for nearly incompressible elasticity based on a mixed Petrov-Galerkin finite element formulation , 1988 .

[18]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  Hydrodynamics of Suspensions of Passive and Active Rigid Particles: A Rigid Multiblob Approach , 2016, 1602.02170.

[19]  Luca Heltai,et al.  Benchmarking the immersed finite element method for fluid-structure interaction problems , 2013, Comput. Math. Appl..

[20]  T. Hughes,et al.  A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: V. Circumventing the Babuscka-Brezzi condition: A stable Petrov-Galerkin formulation of , 1986 .

[21]  Gregory J. Wagner,et al.  Hierarchical enrichment for bridging scales and mesh-free boundary conditions , 2001 .

[22]  Barry Lee,et al.  Finite elements and fast iterative solvers: with applications in incompressible fluid dynamics , 2006, Math. Comput..

[23]  Lucy T. Zhang,et al.  A Parallelized Meshfree Method with Boundary Enrichment for Large-Scale CFD , 2002 .

[24]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  Quasi-static image-based immersed boundary-finite element model of left ventricle under diastolic loading , 2014, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[25]  Arif Masud,et al.  A framework for residual-based stabilization of incompressible finite elasticity: Stabilized formulations and F¯ methods for linear triangles and tetrahedra , 2013 .

[26]  D Lucor,et al.  Uncertainty quantification of inflow boundary condition and proximal arterial stiffness–coupled effect on pulse wave propagation in a vascular network , 2016, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[27]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  Immersed Methods for Fluid-Structure Interaction. , 2020, Annual review of fluid mechanics.

[28]  Hector Gomez,et al.  Non-body-fitted fluid-structure interaction: Divergence-conforming B-splines, fully-implicit dynamics, and variational formulation , 2018, J. Comput. Phys..

[29]  M. Shephard,et al.  A stabilized mixed finite element method for finite elasticity.: Formulation for linear displacement and pressure interpolation , 1999 .

[30]  Stefanie Reese,et al.  A new stabilization technique for finite elements in non-linear elasticity , 1999 .

[31]  Rogelio Ortigosa,et al.  A computational framework for polyconvex large strain elasticity for geometrically exact beam theory , 2015, Computational Mechanics.

[32]  Gerhard A Holzapfel,et al.  Constitutive modelling of passive myocardium: a structurally based framework for material characterization , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[33]  Jeremiah G Murphy,et al.  Transversely isotropic biological, soft tissue must be modelled using both anisotropic invariants , 2013 .

[34]  Robert D. Cook,et al.  Improved Two-Dimensional Finite Element , 1974 .

[35]  C. K. Chong,et al.  3D Mechanical properties of the layered esophagus: experiment and constitutive model. , 2006, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[36]  Weimin Han,et al.  Flexible piecewise approximations based on partition of unity , 2005, Adv. Comput. Math..

[37]  Michel Fortin,et al.  Mixed and Hybrid Finite Element Methods , 2011, Springer Series in Computational Mathematics.

[38]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Nonlinear Finite Elements for Continua and Structures , 2000 .

[39]  Lucy T. Zhang,et al.  Immersed finite element method , 2004 .

[40]  Nancy Wilkins-Diehr,et al.  XSEDE: Accelerating Scientific Discovery , 2014, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[41]  N. Patankar,et al.  Could the peristaltic transition zone be caused by non‐uniform esophageal muscle fiber architecture? A simulation study , 2017, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[42]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  An Immersed Boundary Method with Divergence-Free Velocity Interpolation , 2017 .

[43]  C. Peskin Flow patterns around heart valves: A numerical method , 1972 .

[44]  Peter Wriggers,et al.  Finite element formulations for large strain anisotropic material with inextensible fibers , 2016, Adv. Model. Simul. Eng. Sci..

[45]  Robert Michael Kirby,et al.  Augmenting the immersed boundary method with Radial Basis Functions (RBFs) for the modeling of platelets in hemodynamic flows , 2013, ArXiv.

[46]  C. Peskin Numerical analysis of blood flow in the heart , 1977 .

[47]  B. Griffith,et al.  An immersed boundary method for rigid bodies , 2014, 1505.07865.

[48]  C. Peskin The immersed boundary method , 2002, Acta Numerica.

[49]  Charles S. Peskin,et al.  Improved Volume Conservation in the Computation of Flows with Immersed Elastic Boundaries , 1993 .

[50]  Weimin Han,et al.  Convergence analysis of a hierarchical enrichment of Dirichlet boundary conditions in a mesh‐free method , 2002 .

[51]  L. Heltai,et al.  On the hyper-elastic formulation of the immersed boundary method , 2008 .

[52]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  An accurate and efficient method for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations using the projection method as a preconditioner , 2009, J. Comput. Phys..

[53]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  A continuum mechanics-based musculo-mechanical model for esophageal transport , 2016, J. Comput. Phys..

[54]  Lucy T. Zhang,et al.  On computational issues of immersed finite element methods , 2009, J. Comput. Phys..

[55]  L. Heltai,et al.  Variational implementation of immersed finite element methods , 2011, 1110.2063.

[56]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  An Immersed Boundary method with divergence-free velocity interpolation and force spreading , 2017, J. Comput. Phys..

[57]  R. D. Wood,et al.  Nonlinear Continuum Mechanics for Finite Element Analysis , 1997 .

[58]  P. Flory,et al.  Thermodynamic relations for high elastic materials , 1961 .