Control of different reactive distillation configurations

Three different flowsheets have been proposed for acetic acid esterification of acetic acid with alcohols ranging from C1 to C5 according to the ranking of normal boiling points and immiscibility. This work explores the similarities and differences in the dynamics and control of these three types of flowsheets. The degree of process nonlinearity is analyzed qualitatively based on the residue curve map and the boiling point ranking and it can be computed quantitatively based on the fraction of “sign reversal” for all tray temperatures or based on Allgower's nonlinearity measure. These measures provide useful information to the potential problems in closed-loop control. Next, a systematic design procedure is proposed to devise control structures for all three types of flowsheets for these five esterification systems. The simulation results reveal that reasonable control can be achieved for all five systems with different degrees of asymmetry in closed-loop responses as predicted by the nonlinearity measures. Dual-temperature control and one-temperature/one-composition control are studied. Simulation results clearly show that the simple decentralized control provides a workable solution for highly nonlinear reactive distillation columns under various flowsheet configurations. © 2005 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2006

[1]  Cheng-Ching Yu,et al.  Temperature Control of Heterogeneous Reactive Distillation , 2004 .

[2]  F. Allgower,et al.  Linear modeling error and steady-state behaviour of nonlinear dynamical systems , 2005, Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[3]  William L. Luyben,et al.  Economic and Dynamic Impact of the Use of Excess Reactant in Reactive Distillation Systems , 2000 .

[4]  Achim Kienle,et al.  Nonlinear control of a reactive distillation column , 2003 .

[5]  Muhammad A. Al-Arfaj,et al.  Comparison of Alternative Control Structures for an Ideal Two-Product Reactive Distillation Column , 2000 .

[6]  William L. Luyben,et al.  Practical Distillation Control , 1992 .

[7]  Rajamani Krishna,et al.  Modelling reactive distillation , 2000 .

[8]  E. Bristol.  On a new measure of interaction for multivariable process control , 1966 .

[9]  Devrim B. Kaymak,et al.  Comparison of two types of two-temperature control structures for reactive distillation columns , 2005 .

[10]  K. Sundmacher,et al.  Reactive distillation : status and future directions , 2003 .

[11]  Sebastian Engell,et al.  Control of a reactive separation process , 2003 .

[12]  William L. Luyben,et al.  Quantitative comparison of reactive distillation with conventional multiunit reactor/column/recycle systems for different chemical equilibrium constants , 2004 .

[13]  Michael F. Malone,et al.  Conceptual design of distillation systems , 2001 .

[14]  Frank Allgöwer,et al.  Chapter A3 Quantitative nonlinearity assessmentAn introduction to nonlinearity measures , 2004 .

[15]  F. Doyle,et al.  Correlation of process nonlinearity with closed-loop disturbance rejection , 2003 .

[16]  Cheng-Ching Yu,et al.  The relative gain for non-square multivariable systems , 1990 .

[17]  Cheng-Ching Yu,et al.  Design of reactive distillations for acetic acid esterification , 2005 .

[18]  Shih‐Haur Shen,et al.  Use of relay‐feedback test for automatic tuning of multivariable systems , 1994 .

[19]  Muhammad A. Al-Arfaj,et al.  Comparative control study of ideal and methyl acetate reactive distillation , 2002 .

[20]  Cheng-Ching Yu,et al.  Design alternatives for the amyl acetate process: Coupled reactor/column and reactive distillation , 2002 .

[21]  Moses O. Tadé,et al.  Two-point control of a reactive distillation column for composition and conversion , 1999 .

[22]  Frank Allgöwer,et al.  Nonlinear structure identification of chemical processes , 1997 .