Who is willing to pay for science? On the relationship between public perception of science and the attitude to public funding of science

This article examines the relationship between the general public’s understanding of science and the attitude towards public funding of scientific research. It applies a multivariate and discriminant analysis (Wilks’ Lambda), in addition to a more commonly used bivariate analysis (Cramer’s V), to data compiled from the Third National Survey on the Social Perception of Science and Technology in Spain (FECYT, 2006). The general conclusion is that the multivariate analysis produces information complementary to the bivariate analysis, and that the variables commonly applied in public perception studies have limited predictive value with respect to the attitude towards public funding of scientific research.

[1]  O. Todt,et al.  Consumer attitudes and the governance of food safety , 2009, Public understanding of science.

[2]  Jon D. Miller.  Public Understanding of, and Attitudes toward, Scientific Research: What We Know and What We Need to Know , 2004 .

[3]  Sunil J Rao,et al.  Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis , 2003 .

[4]  B. Wynne,et al.  Misunderstanding science? : the public reconstruction of science and technology , 1996 .

[5]  Scientific Culture and Social Appropriation of the Science , 2007 .

[6]  B. Godin.  Outline for a History of Science Measurement , 2002 .

[7]  N. Allum,et al.  Science in Society: Re-Evaluating the Deficit Model of Public Attitudes , 2004 .

[8]  M. Michael.  Comprehension, Apprehension, Prehension: Heterogeneity and the Public Understanding of Science , 2002 .

[9]  O. Todt,et al.  A new social contract for technology? – On the policy dynamics of uncertainty , 2008 .

[10]  O. Todt,et al.  Food safety governance and social learning: The Spanish experience , 2007 .

[11]  Patrick Sturgis,et al.  Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysis , 2008 .

[12]  M. Michael.  Lay Discourses of Science: Science-in-General, Science-in-Particular, and Self , 1992 .

[13]  Nicola Brace,et al.  SPSS for psychologists , 1999 .

[14]  Egil Kallerud,et al.  The order of discourse in surveys of public understanding of science , 2002 .

[15]  R. Pardo,et al.  The Cognitive Dimension of Public Perceptions of Science: Methodological Issues , 2004 .

[16]  O. Todt,et al.  Perceptions, attitudes and ethical valuations: the ambivalence of the public image of biotechnology in Spain , 2000 .

[17]  R. Pardo,et al.  Attitudes toward science among the European public: a methodological analysis , 2002 .

[18]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Public understanding of science: from contents to processes , 1988 .

[19]  M. Bauer,et al.  Controversial medical and agri-food biotechnology: a cultivation analysis , 2002, Public understanding of science.

[20]  Mike Michael,et al.  Science, Social Theory and Public Knowledge , 2003 .