Can front-of-pack labels influence portion size judgements for unhealthy foods?

Abstract Objective By clearly conveying the healthiness of a food, front-of-pack (FOP) labels have the potential to influence the portion size considered appropriate for consumption. The present study examined the how the Daily Intake Guide (DIG), Multiple Traffic Lights (MTL) and Health Star Rating (HSR) FOP labels affect judgements of appropriate portion sizes of unhealthy foods compared with when no FOP label is present. Design Respondents viewed mock packages of unhealthy variations of pizzas, cookies, yoghurts and cornflakes featuring the DIG, MTL, HSR or no FOP label, and indicated the portion size they believed should be eaten of each food on a single occasion. Setting The survey was completed on the respondent’s personal computer. Subjects A total of 1505 Australian adults provided 4166 ratings across 192 mock packages relating to four product categories: pizza, yoghurt, cornflakes and cookies. Results Compared with no FOP label, the HSR resulted in a small but significant reduction in the portion size selected as appropriate for consumption of pizzas and cornflakes (P<0·05). The MTL resulted in smaller portions of cornflakes being selected compared with no FOP label (P<0·05). Conclusions Respondents perceived smaller portion sizes as appropriate for some, but not all, of the foods tested when FOP labels with more interpretative formats (HSR, MTL) appeared on-pack compared with no FOP label. No effect was found for the less interpretive FOP label (the DIG). Interpretive FOP labels may have the potential to influence portion size judgements, albeit at modest levels.

[1]  M. Rollo,et al.  Influence of the nutrition and health information presented on food labels on portion size consumed: a systematic review , 2018, Nutrition reviews.

[2]  S. Pettigrew,et al.  The relative ability of different front-of-pack labels to assist consumers discriminate between healthy, moderately healthy, and unhealthy foods , 2017 .

[3]  Bridget Kelly,et al.  The types and aspects of front-of-pack food labelling schemes preferred by adults and children , 2017, Appetite.

[4]  S. Pettigrew,et al.  Protocol for a Randomized Trial Assessing Consumer Evaluations of Pre-Packaged Foods that Systematically Vary by Nutrition Information and Product Attributes , 2017, BMC Nutrition.

[5]  Tamara Bucher,et al.  The influence of front‐of‐pack nutrition information on consumers’ portion size perceptions , 2016, Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals.

[6]  Pierre Chandon,et al.  In the eye of the beholder: Visual biases in package and portion size perceptions , 2016, Appetite.

[7]  S. Pettigrew,et al.  Consumers' responses to front-of-pack labels that vary by interpretive content , 2016, Appetite.

[8]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Influence of Interpretation Aids on Attentional Capture, Visual Processing, and Understanding of Front-of-Package Nutrition Labels. , 2015, Journal of nutrition education and behavior.

[9]  M. Livingstone,et al.  Portion size and obesity. , 2014, Advances in nutrition.

[10]  M. L’Abbé,et al.  Consumer attitudes and understanding of cholesterol-lowering claims on food: randomize mock-package experiments with plant sterol and oat fibre claims , 2014, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[11]  N. Busch,et al.  Food-pics: an image database for experimental research on eating and appetite , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[12]  B. Kelly,et al.  Can front-of-pack labelling schemes guide healthier food choices? Australian shoppers’ responses to seven labelling formats , 2014, Appetite.

[13]  L. K. Pourshahidi,et al.  Perceived ‘healthiness’ of foods can influence consumers’ estimations of energy density and appropriate portion size , 2014, International Journal of Obesity.

[14]  S. Henson,et al.  Consumer attitudes and understanding of low-sodium claims on food: an analysis of healthy and hypertensive individuals. , 2013, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[15]  Consumers’ Health-Related Motive Orientations and Reactions to Claims about Dietary Calcium , 2013, Nutrients.

[16]  James C Hersey,et al.  Effects of front-of-package and shelf nutrition labeling systems on consumers. , 2012, Nutrition reviews.

[17]  Barry M. Popkin,et al.  Patterns and Trends in Food Portion Sizes , 2013 .

[18]  Rd EmrichTeri E. Mph,et al.  Effectiveness of front-of-pack nutrition symbols: a pilot study with consumers. , 2012 .

[19]  L. K. Pourshahidi,et al.  Serving size guidance for consumers: is it effective?* , 2012, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society.

[20]  K. Brownell,et al.  Facts up front versus traffic light food labels: a randomized controlled trial. , 2012, American journal of preventive medicine.

[21]  M. L’Abbé,et al.  Effectiveness of front-of-pack nutrition symbols: a pilot study with consumers. , 2012, Canadian journal of dietetic practice and research : a publication of Dietitians of Canada = Revue canadienne de la pratique et de la recherche en dietetique : une publication des Dietetistes du Canada.

[22]  Klaus G. Grunert,et al.  Nutrition knowledge, and use and understanding of nutrition information on food labels among consumers in the UK , 2010, Appetite.

[23]  J. Brug,et al.  A systematic review of studies on socioeconomic inequalities in dietary intakes associated with weight gain and overweight/obesity conducted among European adults , 2009, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[24]  Jennifer L. Crafts,et al.  Assessment of the accuracy of portion size reports using computer-based food photographs aids in the development of an automated self-administered 24-hour recall. , 2010, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[25]  I. Steenhuis,et al.  Portion size: review and framework for interventions , 2009, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[26]  W. Verbeke,et al.  Consumer appeal of nutrition and health claims in three existing product concepts , 2009, Appetite.

[27]  B. Rolls,et al.  The Effect of Large Portion Sizes on Energy Intake Is Sustained for 11 Days , 2007, Obesity.

[28]  B. Wansink,et al.  Can “Low-Fat” Nutrition Labels Lead to Obesity? , 2006 .

[29]  B. Rolls,et al.  Reductions in portion size and energy density of foods are additive and lead to sustained decreases in energy intake. , 2006, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[30]  Lauren Dundes,et al.  Portion Distortion: A Study of College Students. , 2005 .

[31]  Julia A. Ello-Martin,et al.  Portion Sizes and the Obesity Epidemic , 2005 .

[32]  B. Wansink.  Environmental factors that increase the food intake and consumption volume of unknowing consumers. , 2004, Annual review of nutrition.

[33]  R. Mattes,et al.  Effects of food unit size and energy density on intake in humans , 2004, Appetite.

[34]  B. Rolls,et al.  Increasing the portion size of a packaged snack increases energy intake in men and women , 2004, Appetite.

[35]  Marion Nestle,et al.  Expanding portion sizes in the US marketplace: implications for nutrition counseling. , 2003, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[36]  B. Popkin,et al.  Patterns and trends in food portion sizes, 1977-1998. , 2003, JAMA.

[37]  D. Mitchell,et al.  Foods commonly eaten in the United States, 1989-1991 and 1994-1996: are portion sizes changing? , 2003, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[38]  M J Gibney,et al.  Eating patterns – temporal distribution, converging and diverging foods, meals eaten inside and outside of the home – implications for developing FBDG , 2001, Public Health Nutrition.

[39]  M Nestle,et al.  Variation in perceptions of a medium' food portion: implications for dietary guidance. , 1998, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.