Seismic risk mapping for Germany

Abstract. The aim of this study is to assess and map the seismic risk for Germany, restricted to the expected losses of damage to residential buildings. There are several earthquake prone regions in the country which have produced Mw magnitudes above 6 and up to 6.7 corresponding to observed ground shaking intensity up to VIII–IX (EMS-98). Combined with the fact that some of the earthquake prone areas are densely populated and highly industrialized and where therefore the hazard coincides with high concentration of exposed assets, the damaging implications from earthquakes must be taken seriously. In this study a methodology is presented and pursued to calculate the seismic risk from (1) intensity based probabilistic seismic hazard, (2) vulnerability composition models, which are based on the distribution of residential buildings of various structural types in representative communities and (3) the distribution of assets in terms of replacement costs for residential buildings. The estimates of the risk are treated as primary economic losses due to structural damage to residential buildings. The obtained results are presented as maps of the damage and risk distributions. For a probability level of 90% non-exceedence in 50 years (corresponding to a mean return period of 475 years) the mean damage ratio is up to 20% and the risk up to hundreds of millions of euro in the most endangered communities. The developed models have been calibrated with observed data from several damaging earthquakes in Germany and the nearby area in the past 30 years.

[1]  B. Merz,et al.  Comparative Risk Assessments for the City of Cologne – Storms, Floods, Earthquakes , 2006 .

[2]  GEOLOGICAL AND GEOPHYSICAL , 2006 .

[3]  P. Shi,et al.  The housing loss assessment of rural villages caused by earthquake disaster in Yunnan Province , 2005 .

[4]  G. Grünthal.  Die Erdbebenzonenkarte als Bestandteil der neuen DIN 4149 , 2005 .

[5]  G. Grünthal,et al.  Vulnerability And Risk Analysis For Earthquake Prone Communities , 2005 .

[6]  G. Orsini,et al.  New Developments in Seismic Risk Assessment in Italy , 2005 .

[7]  G. Grünthal,et al.  An Mw based earthquake Catalogue for central, northern and northwestern Europe using a hierarchy of magnitude conversions , 2003 .

[8]  Konstantin Meskouris,et al.  Bauwerke und Erdbeben , 2003 .

[9]  G. Trendafiloski,et al.  GIS-ORIENTED METHOD FOR ELABORATION OF PROBABILISTIC EARTHQUAKE SCENARIOS , 2002 .

[10]  G. Grünthal,et al.  VULNERABILITY AND RISK ASSESSMENT FOR EARTHQUAKE PRONE CITIES , 2002 .

[11]  É. Bertrand,et al.  THE EUROPEAN RISK-UE PROJECT : AN ADVANCED APPROACH TO EARTHQUAKE RISK SCENARIOS , 2002 .

[12]  S. Lagomarsino,et al.  A MACROSEISMIC METHOD FOR THE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT OF BUILDINGS , 2002 .

[13]  E. Paulissen,et al.  Surface-rupturing history of the Bree fault scarp, Roer Valley graben: Evidence for six events since the late Pleistocene , 2001 .

[14]  D. Giardini,et al.  Earthquake scenarios for the city of Basel , 2001 .

[15]  Robin K. McGuire,et al.  Deterministic vs. probabilistic earthquake hazards and risks , 2001 .

[16]  Fouad Bendimerad,et al.  Modeling and Quantification of Earthquake Risk: Application to Emerging Economies , 2001 .

[17]  R. Spence.  Recent Earthquake Damage in Europe and Implications for Loss Estimation Methodologies , 2000 .

[18]  K McGuire Robin,et al.  Deterministic vs. probabilistic earthquake hazards and risks , 1999 .

[19]  C. Villacís,et al.  RADIUS (Risk Assessment Tools for Diagnosis of Urban Areas against Seismic Disasters) , 1999 .

[20]  W. A. Lenhardt,et al.  Abschätzung der Erdbebengefährdung für die D‐A‐CH‐Staaten ‐ Deutschland, Österreich, Schweiz , 1998 .

[21]  Thierry Camelbeeck,et al.  Geological and geophysical evidence for large palaeo-earthquakes with surface faulting in the Roer Graben (northwest Europe) , 1998 .

[22]  Francesca Cella,et al.  Assessing seismic risk at different geographical scales: concepts, tools, and procedures , 1998 .

[23]  Franz N. Rad,et al.  An Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology for Buildings Based on ATC-13 and ATC-21 , 1997 .

[24]  K. Law,et al.  Methodologies for Evaluating the Socio-Economic Consequences of Large Earthquakes , 1997 .

[25]  Robert V. Whitman,et al.  FEMA-NIBS Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology , 1997 .

[26]  H. W. Haak,et al.  The macroseismic map of the 1992 Roermond earthquake, the Netherlands , 1996 .

[27]  H. Meidow,et al.  Macroseismic effects in Germany of the 1992 Roermond earthquake and their interpretation , 1996 .

[28]  G. Leydecker.  Erdbebenkatalog für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland mit Randgebieten für die Jahre 1000-1981 , 1986 .

[29]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Seismic Design Decision Analysis , 1975 .

[30]  G. Grandori,et al.  On the choice of the acceptable seismic risk , 1973 .

[31]  C. Cornell.  Engineering seismic risk analysis , 1968 .