Clinical Outcome of Autologous Cultivated Oral Mucosal Epithelial Transplantation in Ocular Surface Reconstruction.

PURPOSE To evaluate the outcomes of autologous cultivated oral mucosal epithelial transplantation (COMET) in ocular surface reconstructive procedures. METHODS Twenty-five eyes of 24 patients who underwent COMET for ocular surface reconstruction were studied retrospectively from April 2011 to March 2014. Oral mucosal biopsy of 2 mm was harvested from all patients and cultured on amniotic membrane for 14 days. COMET was performed as a means to achieve corneal epithelization (group 1) and for fornix reconstruction (group 2). The extent of epithelization achieved (group 1) and the depth of the fornix reconstructed (group 2) were the primary outcome measures. RESULTS Six eyes of 5 patients [2 chemical injury (CI), 3 Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS)] underwent COMET for nonhealing of an epithelial defect within a month after insult or had a nonhealing defect since insult despite maximal medical/surgical therapy. Group 2 included 19 eyes of 19 patients (10 CI, 8 SJS, 1 ocular cicatricial pemphigoid) which underwent COMET for fornix reconstruction. Postsurgery, the cornea was fully epithelized in 66.67% of the eyes (n = 4) and partially epithelized in 33.33% of the eyes (n = 2). The overall improvement in surface epithelization was statistically significant (P = 0.046). Reconstruction of an anatomically deep fornix was achieved in 57% of the eyes (4 CI, 6 SJS and 1 ocular cicatricial pemphigoid). The fornix was partially formed in 26% of the eyes (4 CI and 1 SJS). The overall improvement in fornix reconstruction was considered statistically significant (P = 0.024). The follow-up ranged from 1 to 5 to 27 months with a mean follow-up of 18 months SD ±8.9. CONCLUSIONS COMET, by providing an alternate source of epithelium, aids in faster epithelization and thus can be considered as an option in management of severe grade CI or SJS in the acute stage as well as in fornix reconstructive procedures in chronic stage of ocular surface disorders.

[1]  Shweta Agarwal,et al.  Outcome of allo simple limbal epithelial transplantation (alloSLET) in the early stage of ocular chemical injury , 2016, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[2]  A. Kheirkhah,et al.  A Combined Approach of Amniotic Membrane and Oral Mucosa Transplantation for Fornix Reconstruction in Severe Symblepharon , 2013, Cornea.

[3]  N. Koizumi,et al.  [Indications and surgical outcomes of amniotic membrane transplantation]. , 2012, Nippon Ganka Gakkai zasshi.

[4]  T. Inatomi,et al.  Ocular surface reconstruction using the combination of autologous cultivated oral mucosal epithelial transplantation and eyelid surgery for severe ocular surface disease. , 2011, American journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  S. Krishnakumar,et al.  Culture & characterisation of limbal epithelial cells & oral mucosal cells. , 2010, The Indian journal of medical research.

[6]  N. Koizumi,et al.  Ocular surface reconstruction with combination of cultivated autologous oral mucosal epithelial transplantation and penetrating keratoplasty. , 2006, American journal of ophthalmology.

[7]  N. Koizumi,et al.  Midterm results on ocular surface reconstruction using cultivated autologous oral mucosal epithelial transplantation. , 2006, American journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  A. Caporossi,et al.  Amniotic membrane transplantation in ocular surface disorders , 2005, Journal of cellular physiology.

[9]  T. Inatomi,et al.  Transplantation of cultivated autologous oral mucosal epithelial cells in patients with severe ocular surface disorders , 2004, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[10]  T. Okano,et al.  Corneal reconstruction with tissue-engineered cell sheets composed of autologous oral mucosal epithelium. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  N. Koizumi,et al.  Cultivated corneal epithelial stem cell transplantation in ocular surface disorders. , 2001, Ophthalmology.

[12]  E. Holland,et al.  The evolution of epithelial transplantation for severe ocular surface disease and a proposed classification system. , 1996, Cornea.

[13]  H. Kagami,et al.  The Characteristics of Cultured Mucosal Cell Sheet as a Material for Grafting; Comparison with Cultured Epidermal Cell Sheet , 1995, Annals of plastic surgery.