Critical ranking of steam handling unit using integrated cloud model and extended PROMETHEE for maintenance purpose

To determine the critical component in an industry is one of the most important tasks performed by maintenance personnel to choose the best maintenance policy. Therefore, the purpose of the current paper is to develop a methodology based on integrated cloud model and extended preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE) method for finding the most critical component of the framework by ranking the failure causes of the system from multiple decision maker perspective. For this purpose, ranking of failure causes is performed by taking into account five factors namely chances of occurrence of failure (F0), non-detection probability (Nd), downtime duration (Dd), spare part criticality (Spc) and safety risk (Sr). In this paper, first the primary and secondary weight of decision makers are calculated based on the uncertainty degree and divergence degree, respectively, to determine overall weight using cloud model theory by converting the uncertain linguistic evaluation matrix into interval cloud matrix, and then ranking of the steam handling subunit of paper making unit in a paper mill using extended PROMETHEE. The effectiveness of the proposed methodology is explained by considering steam handling subunit of paper making unit to find the critical component.

[1]  Huiru Zhao,et al.  Risk Evaluation of a UHV Power Transmission Construction Project Based on a Cloud Model and FCE Method for Sustainability , 2015 .

[2]  Abdelhakim Abdelhadi.  Maintenance scheduling based on PROMETHEE method in conjunction with group technology philosophy , 2018 .

[3]  Anish Sachdeva,et al.  Multi-factor failure mode critically analysis using TOPSIS , 2009 .

[4]  A. T. de Almeida,et al.  A multi‐criteria decision‐aiding model using PROMETHEE III for preventive maintenance planning under uncertain conditions , 2007 .

[5]  Preetvanti Singh,et al.  A hybrid decision support model using axiomatic fuzzy set theory in AHP and TOPSIS for multicriteria route selection , 2018 .

[6]  Dinesh Kumar,et al.  Stochastic behaviour analysis of real industrial system , 2017, Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag..

[7]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Green Supplier Evaluation and Selection Using Cloud Model Theory and the QUALIFLEX Method , 2017 .

[8]  Deyi Li,et al.  A new cognitive model: Cloud model , 2009 .

[9]  Ehsan Pourjavad,et al.  Selecting maintenance strategy in mining industry by analytic network process and TOPSIS , 2013 .

[10]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Failure mode and effect analysis with extended grey relational analysis method in cloud setting , 2019 .

[11]  S. Kaplan,et al.  On The Quantitative Definition of Risk , 1981 .

[12]  Xinlong Li,et al.  A failure mode and risk assessment method based on cloud model , 2019, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.

[13]  Guo Ge,et al.  An Improved Topsis Method Based on Cloud Model for Risk Assessment of Failure Modes of Metro Vehicle , 2019, 2019 Chinese Control And Decision Conference (CCDC).

[14]  Gülfem Tuzkaya,et al.  Hospital service quality evaluation with IVIF-PROMETHEE and a case study , 2019 .

[15]  Senem Kursun Bahadir,et al.  Selection of appropriate e-textile structure manufacturing process prior to sensor integration using AHP , 2015 .

[16]  María Teresa Lamata,et al.  Selection of a cleaning system for engine maintenance based on the analytic hierarchy process , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[17]  Xin Guo Ming,et al.  A rough TOPSIS Approach for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Uncertain Environments , 2014, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[18]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  SUPPLIER SELECTION USING COMPROMISE RANKING AND OUTRANKING METHODS , 2011 .

[19]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Using Cloud Model Theory and PROMETHEE Method , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[20]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Improving Risk Evaluation in FMEA With Cloud Model and Hierarchical TOPSIS Method , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[21]  C. Hwang.  Multiple Objective Decision Making - Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1979 .

[22]  Marcello Braglia,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process applied to maintenance strategy selection , 2000, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[23]  M. Ilangkumaran,et al.  Selection of maintenance policy for textile industry using hybrid multi‐criteria decision making approach , 2009 .

[24]  Hainian Wang,et al.  Rutting and Fatigue Properties of Cellulose Fiber-Added Stone Mastic Asphalt Concrete Mixtures , 2019, Advances in Materials Science and Engineering.

[25]  Mi Lu,et al.  Risk Evaluation of Dynamic Alliance Based on Fuzzy Analytic Network Process and Fuzzy TOPSIS , 2012 .

[26]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  An integrated approach for failure mode and effect analysis based on uncertain linguistic GRA–TOPSIS method , 2018, Soft Comput..

[27]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Robot Evaluation and Selection with Entropy-Based Combination Weighting and Cloud TODIM Approach , 2018, Entropy.

[28]  Shahrul Kamaruddin,et al.  Development of a model for optimal maintenance policy selection , 2014 .

[29]  Siba Sankar Mahapatra,et al.  Multi-criteria decision making towards selection of industrial robot: Exploration of PROMETHEE II method , 2015 .

[30]  Yong Hu,et al.  New Failure Mode and Effects Analysis: An Evidential Downscaling Method , 2016, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[31]  Bin Shuai,et al.  Failure mode and effect analysis using regret theory and PROMETHEE under linguistic neutrosophic context , 2020 .

[32]  Mehmet Kabak,et al.  A Hybrid Hesitant Fuzzy Decision-Making Approach for Evaluating Solar Power Plant Location Sites , 2018, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering.

[33]  James J. H. Liou,et al.  A novel multiple-criteria decision-making-based FMEA model for risk assessment , 2018, Appl. Soft Comput..

[34]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  An improved reliability model for FMEA using probabilistic linguistic term sets and TODIM method , 2019, Annals of Operations Research.

[35]  Anish Sachdeva,et al.  A methodology to determine maintenance criticality using AHP , 2008 .

[36]  B. Sennaroglu,et al.  A military airport location selection by AHP integrated PROMETHEE and VIKOR methods , 2018 .

[37]  H. Schneider.  Failure mode and effect analysis : FMEA from theory to execution , 1996 .

[38]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  A Novel Approach for FMEA: Combination of Interval 2‐Tuple Linguistic Variables and Gray Relational Analysis , 2015, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[39]  Selim Zaim,et al.  Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and ANP algorithms: a case study , 2012 .

[40]  Jean Pierre Brans,et al.  HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS: THE PROMETHEE METHOD , 1986 .

[41]  Hu-Chen Liu.  FMEA Using Cloud Model and PROMETHEE Method and Its Application to Emergency Department , 2019 .

[42]  Jianqiang Wang,et al.  An Uncertain Linguistic Multi-criteria Group Decision-Making Method Based on a Cloud Model , 2014, Group Decision and Negotiation.

[43]  Loon Ching Tang,et al.  Fuzzy assessment of FMEA for engine systems , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[44]  Omidvar Mohsen,et al.  An extended VIKOR method based on entropy measure for the failure modes risk assessment – A case study of the geothermal power plant (GPP) , 2017 .

[45]  Sanjeev Kumar,et al.  AHP-VIKOR-based methodology for determining maintenance criticality , 2019 .

[46]  Jing Li,et al.  Modified failure mode and effects analysis under uncertainty: A rough cloud theory-based approach , 2019, Appl. Soft Comput..

[47]  W. J. Moore,et al.  An intelligent maintenance system for continuous cost-based prioritisation of maintenance activities , 2006, Comput. Ind..

[48]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  An integrated decision making approach for assessing healthcare waste treatment technologies from a multiple stakeholder. , 2017, Waste management.

[49]  M. Nassereddine,et al.  Decision making application in collaborative emergency response: A new PROMETHEE preference function , 2019, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.