Human sensitivity to vertical self-motion

AbstractPerceiving vertical self-motion is crucial for maintaining balance as well as for controlling an aircraft. Whereas heave absolute thresholds have been exhaustively studied, little work has been done in investigating how vertical sensitivity depends on motion intensity (i.e., differential thresholds). Here we measure human sensitivity for 1-Hz sinusoidal accelerations for 10 participants in darkness. Absolute and differential thresholds are measured for upward and downward translations independently at 5 different peak amplitudes ranging from 0 to 2 m/s2. Overall vertical differential thresholds are higher than horizontal differential thresholds found in the literature. Psychometric functions are fit in linear and logarithmic space, with goodness of fit being similar in both cases. Differential thresholds are higher for upward as compared to downward motion and increase with stimulus intensity following a trend best described by two power laws. The power laws’ exponents of 0.60 and 0.42 for upward and downward motion, respectively, deviate from Weber’s Law in that thresholds increase less than expected at high stimulus intensity. We speculate that increased sensitivity at high accelerations and greater sensitivity to downward than upward self-motion may reflect adaptations to avoid falling.

[1]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[2]  Rosalie M. Uchanski,et al.  Human discrimination of rotational velocities , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  E. Bárány Diagnose yon Krankheitserscheinungen im Bereiche des Otolithenapparates , 1920 .

[4]  D. Angelaki,et al.  Detection Thresholds of Macaque Otolith Afferents , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  L. Cohen Role of eye and neck proprioceptive mechanisms in body orientation and motor coordination. , 1961, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  C. Tyler,et al.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold , 1999, Vision Research.

[7]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  The Importance of Stimulus Noise Analysis for Self-Motion Studies , 2013, PloS one.

[8]  S. H. Seidman,et al.  Translational motion perception and vestiboocular responses in the absence of non-inertial cues , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  R. Teghtsoonian,et al.  On the exponents in Stevens' law and the constant in Ekman's law. , 1971, Psychological review.

[10]  Tg Tanner,et al.  Generalized adaptive procedure for psychometric measurement , 2008 .

[11]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. III. Response dynamics. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  R Kanayama,et al.  Perceptual studies in patients with vestibular neurectomy. , 1995, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[13]  J. Guilford A generalized psychophysical law. , 1932 .

[14]  A. Bronstein,et al.  Vestibular perceptual thresholds to angular rotation in acute unilateral vestibular paresis and with galvanic stimulation , 2011, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Modeling direction discrimination thresholds for yaw rotations around an earth-vertical axis for arbitrary motion profiles , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  F. O. Black,et al.  Vestibular perception and action employ qualitatively different mechanisms. I. Frequency response of VOR and perceptual responses during Translation and Tilt. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Amir Naseri,et al.  Human discrimination of translational accelerations , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  A. J. Benson,et al.  Thresholds for the detection of the direction of whole-body, linear movement in the horizontal plane. , 1986, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[19]  L R Young,et al.  Optimal estimator model for human spatial orientation. , 1988, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[20]  E. Walsh,et al.  Role of the vestibular apparatus in the perception of motion on a parallel swing , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  Michael Barnett-Cowan,et al.  Is an Internal Model of Head Orientation Necessary for Oculomotor Control? , 2005, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[22]  D Straumann,et al.  Velocity storage contribution to vestibular self-motion perception in healthy human subjects. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  Benjamin T. Crane,et al.  Directional Asymmetries and Age Effects in Human Self-Motion Perception , 2012, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[24]  I S Curthoys,et al.  Head impulse test in unilateral vestibular loss , 2008, Neurology.

[25]  Daniel M Merfeld,et al.  Potential solutions to several vestibular challenges facing clinicians. , 2010, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[26]  J. Solomon The history of dipper functions , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[27]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. II. Directional selectivity and force-response relations. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  Mohsen Jamali,et al.  Response of vestibular nerve afferents innervating utricle and saccule during passive and active translations. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  G. Fechner Elemente der Psychophysik , 1998 .

[30]  L. Young,et al.  Subjective detection of vertical acceleration: a velocity-dependent response? , 1978, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[31]  Benjamin T. Crane,et al.  Fore–aft translation aftereffects , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  Richard F. Lewis,et al.  Vestibular Labyrinth Contributions to Human Whole-Body Motion Discrimination , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  Christian Darlot,et al.  Using sensory weighting to model the influence of canal, otolith and visual cues on spatial orientation and eye movements , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[35]  M. Gresty,et al.  Thresholds for detection of motion direction during passive lateral whole-body acceleration in normal subjects and patients with bilateral loss of labyrinthine function , 1996, Brain Research Bulletin.

[36]  Daniel M Merfeld,et al.  Vestibular perception and action employ qualitatively different mechanisms. II. VOR and perceptual responses during combined Tilt&Translation. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. I. Response to static tilts and to long-duration centrifugal force. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  I S Curthoys,et al.  A clinical sign of canal paresis. , 1988, Archives of neurology.

[39]  Jelte E. Bos,et al.  Theoretical considerations on canal–otolith interaction and an observer model , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[40]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  Vestibular Heading Discrimination and Sensitivity to Linear Acceleration in Head and World Coordinates , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Harald Teufel,et al.  MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions , 2012, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[42]  G. Gescheider Psychophysics: The Fundamentals , 1997 .

[43]  Michael Kerger,et al.  MPI Motion Simulator: Development and Analysis of a Novel Motion Simulator , 2007 .

[44]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Multimodel Inference , 2004 .

[45]  M. Carpenter,et al.  Physiological deficits occurring with lesions of labyrinth and fastigial nuclei. , 1959, Journal of neurophysiology.

[46]  Olympia Kremmyda,et al.  Clinical Testing of Otolith Function: Perceptual Thresholds and Myogenic Potentials , 2013, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[47]  D. Robinson,et al.  The behavior of the vestibulo-ocular reflex at high velocities of head rotation , 1981, Brain Research.