Rigid internal fixation with lateral mass plates in multilevel anterior and posterior reconstruction of the cervical spine.

STUDY DESIGN A retrospective clinical and radiographic analysis was performed on 17 patients with multilevel cervical disease who were treated with anterior and posterior reconstruction with a new rigid, segmental, internal fixation system applied to the lateral masses. OBJECTIVES To determine the applicability, safety, and clinical efficacy of an instrumentation system used as a cervical lateral mass plate in the management of complex spinal disorders. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Cervical disorders involving three or more levels present a difficult reconstruction problem, especially if the posterior elements are deficient. Segmental fixation with lateral mass plating provides an alternative method to situations that would otherwise require a halo. METHODS Seventeen patients treated by a single surgeon underwent cervical reconstruction surgery involving three or more levels. All patients had anterior decompression and reconstruction and a posterior fusion with rigid internal fixation with a device applied to the lateral masses of the cervical vertebrae. Patients were reviewed clinically and radiographically to determine the efficacy and safety of this method of fixation. RESULTS Of the 15 patients with adequate follow-up data that were studied, the condition of 13 patients, (87%) was improved, that of one patient (6.7%) was the same, and that of another (6.7%) was worse after surgical intervention. Sagittal alignment was restored to within 5 degrees of the preoperative lordosis in active extension by the modified Cobb method and the Gore method. No patient had radiographic nonunion. One patient had a sensory radiculopathy associated with an overpenetrated lateral mass screw that partially resolved after hardware removal. One patient had asymptomatic loosening of a C7 lateral mass screw. CONCLUSIONS Segmental posterior fixation with lateral mass plating provides more rigid immobilization than traditional techniques, allows restoration and maintenance of spinal alignment, obviates the need for halo immobilization, and is associated with a low incidence of neurovascular injury.

[1]  H. Larocca,et al.  Fusion Rates in Multilevel Cervical Spondylosis Comparing Allograft Fibula with Autograft Fibula in 126 Patients , 1991, Spine.

[2]  M. Botte,et al.  Complications in the use of the halo fixation device. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  N. Epstein.  The surgical management of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in 51 patients. , 1993, Journal of spinal disorders.

[4]  T. Zdeblick,et al.  Cervical kyphosis and myelopathy. Treatment by anterior corpectomy and strut-grafting. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  M. Panjabi,et al.  An Analysis of Errors in Kinematic Parameters Associated with in Vivo Functional Radiographs , 1992, Spine.

[6]  D. Grob,et al.  Clinical Validation of Functional Flexion/Extension Radiographs of the Cervical Spine , 1993, Spine.

[7]  M. Henley,et al.  Failure of halo vest to prevent in vivo motion in patients with injured cervical spines. , 1991 .

[8]  H. Shingu,et al.  Cervical myelopathy treated by canal-expansive laminaplasty. Computed tomographic and myelographic findings. , 1984, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American volume.

[9]  A. Nordwall,et al.  Forces and motions across the neck in patients treated with halo-vest. , 1988 .

[10]  S. Oka,et al.  Treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy by enlargement of the spinal canal anteriorly, followed by arthrodesis. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  K. Yonenobu,et al.  Choice of Surgical Treatment for Multisegmental Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy , 1985, Spine.

[12]  E. Jauch,et al.  Anatomic and biomechanical study of posterior cervical spine plate arthrodesis: an evaluation of two different techniques of screw placement. , 1992, Journal of spinal disorders.

[13]  J. Fischgrund,et al.  Posterior cervical laminectomy and laminaplasty , 1993 .

[14]  T. Whitecloud,et al.  Fibular Strut Graft in Reconstructive Surgery of the Cervical Spine , 1976 .

[15]  H. Winn,et al.  Posterior Cervical Arthrodesis with AO Reconstruction Plates and Bone Graft , 1991, Spine.

[16]  P. Crandall,et al.  Long‐Term Followup of Surgical Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy , 1977 .

[17]  S. Sepic,et al.  Roentgenographic Findings of the Cervical Spine in Asymptomatic People , 1986, Spine.

[18]  P. McAfee,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Cervical Spinal Stabilization Methods in a Human Cadaveric Model , 1989, Spine.

[19]  P. Connolly,et al.  Anterior Cervical Plate Fixation with the Titanium Hollow Screw Plate System , 1993, Spine.

[20]  J. Ecklund,et al.  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: treatment with posterior decompression and Luque rectangle bone fusion. , 1991, Neurosurgery.

[21]  H. Herkowitz.  A Comparison of Anterior Cervical Fusion, Cervical Laminectomy, and Cervical Laminoplasty for the Surgical Management of Multiple Level Spondylotic Radiculopathy , 1988, Spine.

[22]  P. McAfee,et al.  A Biomechanical Evaluation of Cervical Spinal Stabilization Methods in a Bovine Model: Static and Cyclical Loading , 1988, Spine.

[23]  G. Sypert,et al.  Cervical spine stenosis secondary to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. , 1987, Journal of neurosurgery.

[24]  E. Hanley,et al.  Comparison of Halo Complications in Adults and Children , 1989, Spine.

[25]  J. Glaser,et al.  Failure of immobilization of the cervical spine by the halo vest. A report of five cases. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  K. Yonenobu,et al.  Neurologic Complications of Surgery for Cervical Compression Myelopathy , 1991, Spine.

[27]  R. Snow,et al.  Cervical laminectomy and foraminotomy as surgical treatment of cervical spondylosis: a follow-up study with analysis of failures. , 1993, Journal of spinal disorders.

[28]  F. Fujiyoshi,et al.  Subtotal Vertebrectomy and Spinal Fusion for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy , 1986, Spine.

[29]  W. Young,et al.  An early comparative analysis of the use of fibular allograft versus autologous iliac crest graft for interbody fusion after anterior cervical discectomy. , 1993, Spine.

[30]  K. Saiki,et al.  Paralysis of the arm after posterior decompression of the cervical spinal cord , 1993, European Spine Journal.

[31]  T. Kojima,et al.  Anterior cervical vertebrectomy and interbody fusion for multi-level spondylosis and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. , 1989, Neurosurgery.