Carboplatin dosing based on measurement of renal function--experience at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute.

BACKGROUND Carboplatin is used in treating many types of cancer. Because renal excretion is the major variable determining the pharmacokinetics of this drug, a dosing formula based on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) has been proposed and is being increasingly used in carboplatin dosing. This method of dosing is critically dependent on accurate measurement of GFR. AIMS To report the experience at a single major oncology centre of carboplatin dosing based on GFR, and comparisons of different methods of measuring renal function for use in this dosing method. METHODS An initial group of patients (n = 24) was studied where GFR was measured by Cr51EDTA clearance and compared to Tc99mDTPA clearance, measured 24 hour urine creatinine clearance and the Cockcroft and Gault formula. The carboplatin area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) was calculated using total platinum measured in a single blood sample assayed by flameless atomic absorption spectrophotometry. A subsequent patient group (n = 16) was then studied using Tc99mDTPA clearance to measure GFR. RESULTS Carboplatin dosing using Cr51EDTA clearance to measure GFR was accurate (< 25% difference between planned and measured AUC) in 87% of samples. Estimation of renal function using the Cockcroft and Gault formula correlated with Cr51EDTA clearance only in patients with GFR < 100 mL/minute. The measured 24 hour urine creatinine clearance did not correlate with Cr51EDTA clearance. Using Tc99mDTPA clearance to measure GFR, carboplatin dosing was accurate in 81% of samples. Across a GFR range of 42-239 mL/minute, the Cr51EDTA and Tc99mDTPA clearance were closely correlated (r = 0.98, slope of regression line = 1.02). CONCLUSIONS Carboplatin dosing using a pharmacological formula based on GFR produces accurate targeting of the carboplatin AUC. Tc99mDTPA clearance can be used to measure GFR instead of Cr51EDTA clearance, which is both more convenient and has potential cost savings. Estimates of renal function using the Cockcroft and Gault formula or measured 24 hour creatinine clearance are insufficiently accurate to use for carboplatin dosing.

[1]  G. Houin,et al.  Prediction of carboplatin clearance from standard morphological and biological patient characteristics. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  M. Stevens,et al.  Carboplatin pharmacokinetics in children: the development of a pediatric dosing formula. The United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  K. Hande Pharmacologic-based dosing of carboplatin: a better method. , 1993, Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  A. St John,et al.  A comparison between estimates of GFR using [99mTc]DTPA clearance and the approximation of Cockcroft and Gault. , 1993, Australian and New Zealand journal of medicine.

[5]  H. Magill,et al.  Measurement of Tc‐99m DTPA Serum Clearance for Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate in Children With Cancer , 1993, Pharmacotherapy.

[6]  D. Alberts,et al.  Improved therapeutic index of carboplatin plus cyclophosphamide versus cisplatin plus cyclophosphamide: final report by the Southwest Oncology Group of a phase III randomized trial in stages III and IV ovarian cancer. , 1992, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  W. J. Childs,et al.  The optimisation of carboplatin dose in carboplatin, etoposide and bleomycin combination chemotherapy for good prognosis metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumours of the testis. , 1992, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[8]  P. Langenberg,et al.  Relationships between carboplatin exposure and tumor response and toxicity in patients with ovarian cancer. , 1992, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  StephenM. Brown Iohexol to monitor GFR , 1992, The Lancet.

[10]  E Wiltshaw,et al.  Carboplatin dosage: prospective evaluation of a simple formula based on renal function. , 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  M. Rozencweig,et al.  Carboplatin: current status and future prospects. , 1988, Cancer treatment reviews.

[12]  R. Kefford,et al.  Carboplatin (CBDCA, JM-8) and VP-16-213 in previously untreated patients with small-cell lung cancer. , 1987, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  Z. Siddik,et al.  The comparative pharmacokinetics of carboplatin and cisplatin in mice and rats. , 1987, Biochemical pharmacology.

[14]  J P Kriss,et al.  Limitations of creatinine as a filtration marker in glomerulopathic patients. , 1985, Kidney international.

[15]  B. Leyland-Jones,et al.  Results of NCI-sponsored phase I trials with carboplatin. , 1985, Cancer treatment reviews.

[16]  M. Egorin,et al.  Pharmacokinetics and dosage reduction of cis-diammine(1,1-cyclobutanedicarboxylato)platinum in patients with impaired renal function. , 1984, Cancer research.

[17]  M Rehling,et al.  Simultaneous measurement of renal clearance and plasma clearance of 99mTc-labelled diethylenetriaminepenta-acetate, 51Cr-labelled ethylenediaminetetra-acetate and inulin in man. , 1984, Clinical science.

[18]  Z. Siddik,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of cis-diammine-1,1-cyclobutane dicarboxylate platinum(II) in patients with normal and impaired renal function. , 1984, Cancer research.

[19]  S. Oman,et al.  Estimation of creatinine clearance without 24-hour urine collection--a useful guide during cisplatin therapy. , 1993, Acta oncologica.

[20]  Cockcroft Dw,et al.  Prediction of Creatinine Clearance from Serum Creatinine , 1976 .

[21]  J. Bröchner-Mortensen,et al.  Selection of routine method for determination of glomerular filtration rate in adult patients. , 1976, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.