Networks, Information and Brokerage: The Diversity-Bandwidth Tradeoff

We propose that a trade-off between network diversity and communications bandwidth regulates access to novel information. As the structural diversity of a network increases, the bandwidth of its communication channels decrease, creating countervailing effects on the receipt of novel information. This trade-off occurs because more diverse networks, presumed to provide more information novelty, typically contain weaker ties. Weaker ties imply fewer opportunities for interaction and less total information flow. Information advantages to brokerage then depend on (a) whether the information overlap among alters is small enough to justify bridging structural holes, (b) whether the size of the topic space known to alters is large enough to consistently provide novelty, and (c) whether the knowledge stock of alters refreshes enough over time to justify updating what was previously known. We test these arguments by combining social network and performance data with direct observation of the information content flowing through e-mail at a medium-sized executive recruiting firm. We find that brokers with bridging ties to disparate parts of a social network can have disadvantaged access to novel information because their lower bandwidth communication curbs the total volume of novelty they receive. These analyses suggest that information benefits to brokerage depend on the information environments in which brokers find themselves and that we should embrace a more nuanced view of how information flows in social networks. The methods developed serve as ‘proof-of-concept’ for using e-mail content data to analyze relationships among information flows, networks and social capital.

[1]  D. Krackhardt Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. , 1990 .

[2]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: The Social Capital of Corporate R&D Teams , 2001 .

[3]  Marc W. Steinberg,et al.  The Talk and Back Talk of Collective Action: A Dialogic Analysis of Repertoires of Discourse among Nineteenth‐Century English Cotton Spinners1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  P. Murray COLLABORATION AND CREATIVITY , 2004 .

[5]  John F. Padgett,et al.  Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400-1434 , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  Michel Léonard,et al.  Information overlap , 1999, Proceedings 1999 International Symposium on Database Applications in Non-Traditional Environments (DANTE'99) (Cat. No.PR00496).

[7]  Mark S. Granovetter Threshold Models of Collective Behavior , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  R. Burt Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  D. Watts,et al.  Origins of Homophily in an Evolving Social Network1 , 2009, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  M. Macy,et al.  Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties1 , 2007, American Journal of Sociology.

[11]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[12]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  G. Huber The Nature and Design of Post-Industrial Organizations , 1984 .

[14]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Why knowledge does not equal power: the network redundancy trade-off , 2008 .

[16]  H. White,et al.  Network switchings and Bayesian forks : Reconstructing the social and behavioral sciences , 1995 .

[17]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[18]  Richard Swedberg,et al.  Economics and Sociology: Redefining Their Boundaries: Conversations with Economists and Sociologists , 1990 .

[19]  David Krackhardt,et al.  Cognitive social structures , 1987 .

[20]  P. Blau Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[21]  W. Finlay,et al.  Risk, Opportunism, and Structural Holes , 2000 .

[22]  T. Newcomb,et al.  The Acquaintance Process , 1962 .

[23]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[24]  R. Putnam Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital , 1995, The City Reader.

[25]  J. Driscoll,et al.  Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Spatially Dependent Panel Data , 1998, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[26]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  Social Networks and the Performance of Individuals and Groups , 2001 .

[27]  D. Wegner Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind , 1987 .

[28]  T. Allen Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[29]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[30]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[31]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[32]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Making Fast Strategic Decisions In High-Velocity Environments , 1989 .

[33]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[34]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performance , 2003, Soc. Networks.

[35]  Gueorgi Kossinets,et al.  Empirical Analysis of an Evolving Social Network , 2006, Science.

[36]  Fangcheng Tang,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer , 2007, International Conference on Computational Science.

[37]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Summary of Research on Informant Accuracy in Network Data, 11 and on the Reverse Small World Problem , 2003 .

[38]  Allen M. Weiss,et al.  Marketing in Turbulent Environments: Decision Processes and the Time-Sensitivity of Information , 1993 .

[39]  W. Baker Market Networks and Corporate Behavior , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[40]  L. Argote Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge , 1999 .

[41]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Structural Cohesion and Equivalence Explanations of Social Homogeneity , 1984 .

[42]  Patricia E. Tweet Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital , 2006 .

[43]  Rashi Glazer Marketing in an Information-Intensive Environment: Strategic Implications of Knowledge as an Asset , 1991 .

[44]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[45]  David Obstfeld Social Networks, the Tertius Iungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation , 2005 .

[46]  Joel Podolny Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Market1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[47]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .

[48]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[50]  David Lazer,et al.  The Network Structure of Exploration and Exploitation , 2007 .

[51]  James N. Baron,et al.  Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace , 1997 .

[52]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Information flow in social groups , 2003, cond-mat/0305305.

[53]  Ann Mische,et al.  CROSS-TALK IN MOVEMENTS: RECONCEIVING THE CULTURE- NETWORK LINK , 2000 .

[54]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Knowledge Networks: Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies , 2002 .

[55]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  NETWORK DATA AND MEASUREMENT , 1990 .

[56]  C. Cramton The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[57]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  Evolutionary algorithms , 1997, Emerging Evolutionary Algorithms for Antennas and Wireless Communications.

[58]  Goldberg,et al.  Genetic algorithms , 1993, Robust Control Systems with Genetic Algorithms.

[59]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Global Village or Cyberbalkans: Modeling and Measuring the Integration of Electronic Communities , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[60]  R. Burt Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[61]  Jonathon N. Cummings Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[62]  D. Bell The Coming of the Post-Industrial Society , 1973 .

[63]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Institutional Embeddedness and the Dynamics of Organizational Populations , 1992 .

[64]  Charles F. Sabel,et al.  Pragmatic Collaborations: Advancing Knowledge While Controlling Opportunism , 2000 .

[65]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Distributed Work , 2002 .

[66]  H. White,et al.  Modeling discourse in and around markets , 2000 .

[67]  H. Simon,et al.  Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning , 1991 .

[68]  Nina Eliasoph,et al.  Making a fragile public : A talk-centered study of citizenship and power , 1996 .

[69]  F. Heider The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[70]  M. Weitzman,et al.  Recombinant Growth , 2009 .

[71]  D. Krackhardt,et al.  Whether close or far: Social distance effects on perceived balance in friendship networks , 1999 .

[72]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance , 1992 .

[73]  Ray E. Reagans,et al.  All in the family: reply to Burt, Podolny, and van de Rijt, Ban, and Sarkar , 2008 .

[74]  Sinan Aral,et al.  Productivity Effects of Information Diffusion in Networks , 2007 .

[75]  Gerard Salton,et al.  A vector space model for automatic indexing , 1975, CACM.

[76]  R. Burt The Network Structure Of Social Capital , 2000 .

[77]  W. Batchelder,et al.  Systematic Biases in Social Perception , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[78]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[79]  Paul R. Lichterman,et al.  The search for political community , 1996 .

[80]  David R. Gibson Taking Turns and Talking Ties: Networks and Conversational Interaction1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[81]  B. Kogut,et al.  Social Capital, Structural Holes and the Formation of an Industry Network , 1997 .

[82]  H. White A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[83]  P. Drew,et al.  Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings , 1995 .

[84]  Adolph Lowe,et al.  Economics and Sociology , 2003 .

[85]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[86]  M. Jackson,et al.  An Economic Model of Friendship: Homophily, Minorities and Segregation , 2007 .

[87]  Paolo Pin,et al.  Identifying the roles of race-based choice and chance in high school friendship network formation , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[88]  D. Watts Networks, Dynamics, and the Small‐World Phenomenon1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[89]  Paul R. Lichterman,et al.  The search for political community: American activists reinventing commitment , 1996 .

[90]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks , 1998 .

[91]  A. Z. Iskandar,et al.  Technology and applied sciences , 2001 .

[92]  N. Lin Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action , 2001 .

[93]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[94]  T. Schelling Micromotives and Macrobehavior , 1978 .

[95]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[96]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[97]  Ann Mische,et al.  Between Conversation and Situation: Public Switching Dynamics Across Network-Domains , 1998 .

[98]  R. Moreland,et al.  Group Versus Individual Training and Group Performance: The Mediating Role of Transactive Memory , 1995 .

[99]  G. Simmel,et al.  Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations , 1955 .

[100]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Information and structural holes: comment on Reagans and Zuckerman , 2008 .

[101]  Wayne E. Baker,et al.  The Social Structure of a National Securities Market , 1984, American Journal of Sociology.

[102]  Dylan Walker,et al.  Creating Social Contagion Through Viral Product Design: A Randomized Trial of Peer Influence in Networks , 2010, ICIS.

[103]  Simon Rodan,et al.  More than Network Structure: How Knowledge Heterogeneity Influences Managerial Performance and Innovativeness , 2004 .

[104]  Joel Podolny A Status-Based Model of Market Competition , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[105]  Paul D. McLean,et al.  A Frame Analysis of Favor Seeking in the Renaissance: Agency, Networks, and Political Culture1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[106]  Sinan Aral,et al.  Identifying Social Influence: A Comment on Opinion Leadership and Social Contagion in New Product Diffusion , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[107]  A. S. Correspondent,et al.  … encounters , 1976, Nature.