A proposal to demonstrate a harmonized quality approach to analytical data production by EuroFIR

Analytical results are a major source of data input into food composition databanks (FCDBs). However, the methodology used to obtain and assess analytical data may introduce imprecision and errors during the compilation process. EuroFIR will provide guidance on establishing appropriate quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) of data to support international harmonisation of a quality approach to analytical data production for FCDBs. Aspects based on reliability and comparability of data will be considered using available quality criteria such as implementation of EN ISO/IEC 17025 or good laboratory practice (GLP), sampling plan, sample handling, correct use of reference materials, traceability of the measurement process and participation in proficiency testing. To promote an improved understanding of quality criteria by all EuroFIR partners, examples of available quality information for FCDB data (by food item and component) will be disseminated. This will ensure a global consensus on what constitutes a fit-for-purpose FCDB data quality system in order to achieve similar interpretation of analytical results across the European Union and beyond.

[1]  P. Kolsteren,et al.  A concise overview of national nutrition action plans in the European Union Member States , 2005, Public Health Nutrition.

[2]  A. Boenke,et al.  Importance of the certified reference materials programmes for the european union , 1997 .

[3]  Hendrik Emons,et al.  Reference materials: terminology and use. Can't one see the forest for the trees? , 2004 .

[4]  M. Ikeda,et al.  Estimation of nutrient intake by the new version of Japanese food composition tables in comparison with that by the previous version. , 2001, The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine.

[5]  Joanne M. Holden,et al.  The European Nutrient Database (ENDB) for nutritional epidemiology , 2002 .

[6]  P. Willetts,et al.  Measurement uncertainty – a reliable concept in food analysis and for the use of recovery data? , 1998 .

[7]  R. Vré The scope and limitations of a QA system in research , 2000 .

[8]  B A Swinburn,et al.  Diet, nutrition and the prevention of excess weight gain and obesity , 2004, Public Health Nutrition.

[9]  Lars Jorhem Certified reference materials as a quality tool in food control: much used—often misused—sometimes abused , 2004 .

[10]  B. Schneeman,et al.  Evolution of dietary guidelines. , 2003, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[11]  G. Harrison Fostering data quality in food composition databases: applications and implications for public health , 2004 .

[12]  Joseph G. Voelkel,et al.  Guide to Quality Control , 1982 .

[13]  N Slimani,et al.  Comparison of nutrients in the food composition tables available in the nine European countries participating in EPIC , 1999, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[14]  Ron Walker,et al.  Pitfalls in terminology and use of reference materials , 1999 .

[15]  N. Scrimshaw,et al.  INFOODS: the international network of food data systems. , 1997, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[16]  Anders Møller,et al.  EUROFOODS Recommendations for Food Composition Database Management and Data Interchange , 2000 .

[17]  S. Innis,et al.  Variability in the trans fatty acid content of foods within a food category: implications for estimation of dietary trans fatty acid intakes. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Nutrition.

[18]  D. A. T. Southgate,et al.  Food Composition Data: Production, Management and Use , 1992 .

[19]  D. A. T. Southgate,et al.  Reference material for improving the quality of nutritional composition data for foods , 1987 .

[20]  H. Greenfield,et al.  The impact of new Australian food composition data on national dietary references , 1996 .

[21]  David B. Haytowitz,et al.  Development of a database of critically evaluated flavonoids data: application of USDA's data quality evaluation system , 2005 .

[22]  Elke Anklam,et al.  Strategic views of accreditation , 2004 .