The use of soil organic matter as a criterion of the relative sustainability of forest management alternatives: a modelling approach using FORECAST

Abstract The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness and sensitivity of parameters that describe various soil organic matter characteristics for the evaluation of harvesting impacts on ecosystem function, using an ecosystem-level, hybrid simulation model (FORECAST, a model developed from its predecessor FORCYTE-11). Four separate sets of forest management options were applied to both a simulated unmanaged Douglas-fir forest (with a high accumulation of forest floor, coarse woody debris, and the nutrients contained therein) and to a simulated Douglas-fir forest growing on a site depleted in organic matter and nutrients. These four options consisted of the combination of two rotation lengths (40 vs. 80 years), and two levels of biomass utilization (full-tree vs. conventional tree length harvest). Based on the model simulations, productivity on the previously unmanaged site dropped significantly (to 59% of the value for the original, unmanaged forest) by the end of the second 40 year rotation when subjected to an intensive management option (40 year rotation, full-tree harvesting). However, a rapid drop in the active soil pool of decomposing organic matter occurred and was not rebuilt. As a result of this reduction in the size of the active soil pool, nitrogen deficiencies (N-demand greater than N-uptake) occurred in the subsequent rotations. In contrast, the initially nutritionally degraded site responded positively to an intermediate level of management (80 year rotations, stem-only harvesting), with a steady increment in the active soil organic matter pool size over the 240 year simulation period. This response indicates that sites degraded by past activities generally have the ability to recover (aggrade) if put under a less demanding management regime. Change in the mass and dynamics of active soil organic matter provides a more rapid and sensitive parameter than tree growth when attempting to assess the sustainability of management alternatives. Examples are presented which illustrate the importance of the starting state condition, as well as the management system being applied, when attempting to assess the sustainability of management alternatives.

[1]  J. P. Kimmins.  Modelling the Sustainability of Forest Production and Yield for a Changing and Uncertain Future , 1990 .

[2]  E. W. Jones,et al.  Forest Ecology , 1968, Nature.

[3]  W. Parton,et al.  Analysis of factors controlling soil organic matter levels in Great Plains grasslands , 1987 .

[4]  H. W. Hunt,et al.  Phoenix, a model of the dynamics of carbon and nitrogen in grassland soils , 1981 .

[5]  R. K. Dixon,et al.  Process modeling of forest growth responses to environmental stress , 1991 .

[6]  E. Paul,et al.  ORGANIC CARBON DYNAMICS IN GRASSLAND SOILS. 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SIMULATION , 1981 .

[7]  D. Jenkinson.  STUDIES ON THE DECOMPOSITION OF PLANT MATERIAL IN SOIL , 1965 .

[8]  Glenn M. Hawk,et al.  Relationships of Environment to Composition, Structure, and Diversity of Forest Communities of the Central Western Cascades of Oregon , 1976 .

[9]  Roderick R. Riewe,et al.  Resources and Dynamics of the Boreal Zone. , 1984 .

[10]  Daniel B. Botkin,et al.  Predicting the effects of different harvesting regimes on forest floor dynamics in northern hardwoods , 1978 .

[11]  D. W. HADLEY,et al.  Testing for Performance , 1967, Nature.

[12]  J. P. Kimmins.  Scientific foundations for the simulation of ecosystem function and managment in FORCYTE-11 , 1993 .

[13]  D. Anderson,et al.  DECOMPOSITION OF WHEAT STRAW AND STABILIZATION OF MICROBIAL PRODUCTS , 1989 .

[14]  E. Paul,et al.  INVESTIGATIONS OF THE DYNAMICS OF SOIL HUMUS UTILIZING CARBON DATING TECHNIQUES , 1964 .

[15]  W. Covington.  Changes in Forest Floor Organic Matter and Nutrient Content Following Clear Cutting in Northern Hardwoods , 1981 .

[16]  D. Jenkinson.  STUDIES ON THE DECOMPOSITION OF PLANT MATERIAL IN SOIL. V. THE EFFECTS OF PLANT COVER AND SOIL TYPE ON THE LOSS OF CARBON FROM14C LABELLED RYEGRASS DECOMPOSING UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS , 1977 .

[17]  C. T. Youngberg.  Forest Floors in Douglas-Fir Forests: I. Dry Weight and Chemical Properties1 , 1966 .

[18]  J. P. Kimmins.  Sustained yield, timber mining, and the concept of eclogical rotation; a British Columbian view , 1974 .

[19]  J. P. Kimmins.  Community organization: methods of study and prediction of the productivity and yield of forest ecosystems , 1988 .

[20]  Donald A. Perala,et al.  Biomass and nutrient distribution in aspen, pine, and spruce stands on the same soil type in Minnesota , 1978 .

[21]  W. J. Dyck,et al.  Impacts of Forest Harvesting on Long-Term Site Productivity , 1994, Springer Netherlands.

[22]  Keith Paustian,et al.  Modeling soil organic matter in organic-amended and nitrogen-fertilized long-term plots , 1992 .

[23]  D. Binkley,et al.  The Components of Nitrogen Availability Assessments in Forest Soils , 1989 .

[25]  T. Redman.  The Impact of , 1998 .

[26]  Roderick R. Riewe,et al.  Nutrient cycling dynamics in differing spruce and mixedwood ecosystems in Ontario and the effects of nutrient removals through harvesting , 1983 .

[27]  J. P. Kimmins.  Evaluation of the consequences for future tree productivity of the loss of nutrients in whole-tree harvesting , 1976 .

[28]  W. Post,et al.  Development of a linked forest productivity-soil process model , 1985 .