Improving federal technology commercialization: Some recommendations from a field study

This study identified three distinct roles of the federal technology-transfer process in the Huntsville, Alabama region: sponsors, developers, and adopters. The basic structure of transfer barriers and measures during the prospecting and developing of the federal technology-transfer process is also discussed. Sponsors attributed transfer problems to adopters' lack of awareness, while developers cited long development and payback times. Adopters admitted their lack of transfer expertise and their resistance to technologies with long paybacks. None of the role-players were measuring technology transfer very well. While sponsors agreed with adopters that long-term outcome measures were important, sponsors relied on measures of input effort and intermediate results. Developers with the most transfer experience reported the lowest use of measures. Recommendations are made for each role to help improve federal technology transfer.

[1]  T. C. O'Brien,et al.  Evaluation framework for Federal technology transfer initiatives , 1981 .

[2]  Donald W. Barclay,et al.  Technology Transfer to the Private Sector: A Field Study of Manufacturer Buying behavior , 1992 .

[3]  E. Jonathan Soderstrom,et al.  Patent Policy Changes Stimulating Commercial Application of Federal R&D , 1986 .

[4]  R. Weijo.  Strategies for promoting technology transfer to the private sector , 1987 .

[5]  D. Hambrick.  An Empirical Typology of Mature Industrial-Product Environments , 1983 .

[6]  Dennis A. Swyt,et al.  Transferring NBS technology to small manufacturers through state and local centers , 1988 .

[7]  Roger J. Calantone,et al.  Evaluating International Technology Transfer in a Comparative Marketing Framework , 1990 .

[8]  Joseph Morone,et al.  Problems and Opportunities in Technology Transfer from the National Laboratories to Industry , 1982 .

[9]  Alex Miller,et al.  Financial performance patterns of new corporate ventures: an alternative to traditional measures☆ , 1988 .

[10]  James Alvin Jolly,et al.  The manager's role in technology transfer , 1985 .

[11]  Gregory Gwynne Dess.  The relationship between objective and subjective measures of manufacturers' competitive environments : implications for firm economic performance , 1980 .

[12]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  The practice of social research , 1969 .

[13]  D. Merrifield,et al.  Industrial survival via management technology , 1988 .

[14]  L. Bourgeois.  Performance and consensus , 1980 .

[15]  Gerald Nadler,et al.  “TOTALS”: Transfer of technology approached logically and systematically , 1980 .

[16]  William E. Souder,et al.  Transferring New Technologies From R&D To Manufacturing , 1989 .

[17]  Werner Jung.  Basic concepts for the evaluation of technology transfer benefits , 1980 .

[18]  Wm. E. Souder,et al.  A guide to the best technology-transfer practices , 1990 .

[19]  Ian C. MacMillan,et al.  Effects of strategy and environment on corporate venture success in industrial markets , 1991 .