Validity conditions for moment closure approximations in stochastic chemical kinetics.

Approximations based on moment-closure (MA) are commonly used to obtain estimates of the mean molecule numbers and of the variance of fluctuations in the number of molecules of chemical systems. The advantage of this approach is that it can be far less computationally expensive than exact stochastic simulations of the chemical master equation. Here, we numerically study the conditions under which the MA equations yield results reflecting the true stochastic dynamics of the system. We show that for bistable and oscillatory chemical systems with deterministic initial conditions, the solution of the MA equations can be interpreted as a valid approximation to the true moments of the chemical master equation, only when the steady-state mean molecule numbers obtained from the chemical master equation fall within a certain finite range. The same validity criterion for monostable systems implies that the steady-state mean molecule numbers obtained from the chemical master equation must be above a certain threshold. For mean molecule numbers outside of this range of validity, the MA equations lead to either qualitatively wrong oscillatory dynamics or to unphysical predictions such as negative variances in the molecule numbers or multiple steady-state moments of the stationary distribution as the initial conditions are varied. Our results clarify the range of validity of the MA approach and show that pitfalls in the interpretation of the results can only be overcome through the systematic comparison of the solutions of the MA equations of a certain order with those of higher orders.

[1]  N. Kampen,et al.  Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry , 1981 .

[2]  Ramon Grima,et al.  A study of the accuracy of moment-closure approximations for stochastic chemical kinetics. , 2012, The Journal of chemical physics.

[3]  R. Grima,et al.  How reliable is the linear noise approximation of gene regulatory networks? , 2013, BMC Genomics.

[4]  John Eccleston,et al.  Statistics and Computing , 2006 .

[5]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[6]  R. Grima,et al.  An effective rate equation approach to reaction kinetics in small volumes: theory and application to biochemical reactions in nonequilibrium steady-state conditions. , 2010, The Journal of chemical physics.

[7]  W. Ebeling Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry , 1995 .

[8]  René Lefever,et al.  The Brusselator: It does Oscillate all the same , 1988 .

[9]  Michael P H Stumpf,et al.  A general moment expansion method for stochastic kinetic models. , 2013, The Journal of chemical physics.

[10]  N. Friedman,et al.  Stochastic protein expression in individual cells at the single molecule level , 2006, Nature.

[11]  M. Thattai,et al.  Intrinsic noise in gene regulatory networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Darren J. Wilkinson,et al.  Moment closure based parameter inference of stochastic kinetic models , 2013, Stat. Comput..

[13]  N. Kampen,et al.  a Power Series Expansion of the Master Equation , 1961 .

[14]  F. Schlögl Chemical reaction models for non-equilibrium phase transitions , 1972 .

[15]  W. Ebeling,et al.  Stochastic dynamics of a bistable reaction system , 1979 .

[16]  T. Kurtz The Relationship between Stochastic and Deterministic Models for Chemical Reactions , 1972 .

[17]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[18]  D. A. Mcquarrie Stochastic approach to chemical kinetics , 1967, Journal of Applied Probability.

[19]  R. Grima,et al.  Molecular noise induces concentration oscillations in chemical systems with stable node steady states. , 2013, The Journal of chemical physics.

[20]  I. Prigogine,et al.  Symmetry Breaking Instabilities in Dissipative Systems. II , 1968 .

[21]  J. Lygeros,et al.  Moment-based inference predicts bimodality in transient gene expression , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  J. Elf,et al.  Fast evaluation of fluctuations in biochemical networks with the linear noise approximation. , 2003, Genome research.

[23]  Andreas Hellander,et al.  A Hierarchy of Approximations of the Master Equation Scaled by a Size Parameter , 2008, J. Sci. Comput..

[24]  Vahid Shahrezaei,et al.  Analytical distributions for stochastic gene expression , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Deena R. Schmidt,et al.  Steady-state fluctuations of a genetic feedback loop: an exact solution. , 2012, The Journal of chemical physics.

[26]  R. Grima,et al.  Intrinsic Noise Analyzer: A Software Package for the Exploration of Stochastic Biochemical Kinetics Using the System Size Expansion , 2012, PloS one.

[27]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[28]  G. Verghese,et al.  Mass fluctuation kinetics: capturing stochastic effects in systems of chemical reactions through coupled mean-variance computations. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[29]  Daniel T Gillespie,et al.  Stochastic simulation of chemical kinetics. , 2007, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[30]  C. Gardiner,et al.  Stochastic models of firstorder nonequilibrium phase transitions in chemical reactions , 1975 .

[31]  O. Wolkenhauer,et al.  Investigating the two-moment characterisation of subcellular biochemical networks. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.