Future Trends in the Design Strategies and Technological Affordances of E-Learning

E-learning has become an increasingly important learning and teaching mode in recent decades and has been recognized as an efficient and effective learning method. The rapidly rising number of Internet users with smartphones and tablets around the world has supported the spread of e-learning, not only in higher education and vocational training but also in primary and secondary schools. E-learning and traditional distance education approaches share the emphasis on “any time, any place” learning and the assumption that students are at a distance from the instructor. The design of the initial e-learning courses tended to replicate existing distance education practice based on content delivery. However, long textual lectures were clearly not suitable for the online environment. These early insights guided the development of e-learning (technical and pedagogical) and emphasized the need for communication and interaction. B. Gros Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain e-mail: bgros@ub.edu F.J. García-Peñalvo Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain e-mail: fgarcia@usal.es Gros, B., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2016). Future trends in the design strategies and technological affordances of e-learning. In M. Spector, B. B. Lockee, & M. D. Childress (Eds.), Learning, Design, and Technology. An International Compendium of Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy (pp. 1-23). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_67-1 E-learning describes learning delivered fully online where technology mediates the learning process, teaching is delivered entirely via Internet, and students and instructors are not required to be available at the same time and place. E-learning practices are evolving with the mutual influence of technological e-learning platforms and pedagogical models. Today, the broad penetration and consolidation of e-learning needs to advance and open up to support new possibilities. Future e-learning should encompass the use of Internet technologies for both formal and informal learning by leveraging different services and applications. The purpose of this chapter is to provide a general analysis of the evolution and future trends in e-learning. The authors intend to summarize findings from contemporary research into e-learning in order to understand its current state and to identify the main challenges in the technological and pedagogical affordances of e-learning.

[1]  Peter Aubusson,et al.  An ecology of science education , 2002 .

[2]  Faraón Llorens Largo,et al.  Campus virtuales: de gestores de contenidos a gestores de metodologías Virtual Campuses: from content management to methodology management , 2014 .

[3]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  Learning services-based technological ecosystems , 2015, TEEM '15.

[4]  S. Noesgaard,et al.  The effectiveness of e-learning: An explorative and integrative review of the definitions, methodologies and factors that promote e-Learning effectiveness , 2015 .

[5]  Francisco José García-Peñalvo,et al.  Advances in E-Learning: Experiences and Methodologies , 2008 .

[6]  Qinghua Zheng,et al.  An E-learning Ecosystem Based on Cloud Computing Infrastructure , 2009, 2009 Ninth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[7]  M. L. Cadenasso,et al.  The Ecosystem as a Multidimensional Concept: Meaning, Model, and Metaphor , 2002, Ecosystems.

[8]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  Knowledge management ecosystem based on drupal platform for promoting the collaboration between public administrations , 2014, TEEM '14.

[9]  J. Paulo Davim,et al.  Gamification in engineering education and professional training , 2015 .

[10]  Raidell Avello Martínez McGreal, R., Kinuthia, W. & Marshall, S. (Ed.) (2013). Open Educational Resources: Innovation, Research and Practice. Vancuver: Commonwealth of Learning and Athabasca University. , 2014 .

[11]  N. Dabbagh The Online Learner: Characteristics and Pedagogical Implications , 2007 .

[12]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[13]  T. Anderson,et al.  Three Generations of Distance Education Pedagogy. , 2010 .

[14]  María José Rodriguez-Conde,et al.  Perceived openness of Learning Management Systems by students and teachers in education and technology courses , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  Francisco José García-Peñalvo,et al.  Una revisión actualizada del concepto de eLearning. Décimo Aniversario An updated review of the concept of eLearning. Tenth anniversary , 2015 .

[16]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  A methodology proposal for developing adaptive cMOOC , 2013, TEEM '13.

[17]  Margarita Martinez-Nuñez,et al.  New challenges for the motivation and learning in engineering education using gamification in MOOC , 2015 .

[18]  David Wiley,et al.  Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy , 2000 .

[19]  F. Nachira,et al.  A Network of Digital Business Ecosystems for Europe : Roots , Processes and Perspectives , 2007 .

[20]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  The evolution of the technological ecosystems: an architectural proposal to enhancing learning processes , 2013, TEEM '13.

[21]  Dragan Gasevic,et al.  Externally-facilitated regulation scaffolding and role assignment to develop cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions , 2015, Internet High. Educ..

[22]  Elizabeth Chang,et al.  Digital Ecosystems A Next Generation of the Collaborative Environment , 2006, iiWAS.

[23]  F. García-Peñalvo Estado actual de los sistemas e-learning , 2022, Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS).

[24]  Chen Wu,et al.  Exploring a Digital Ecosystem Conceptual Model and Its Simulation Prototype , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics.

[25]  Terry Anderson,et al.  Towards a Theory of Online Learning , 2004 .

[26]  Klaus Marius Hansen,et al.  Software ecosystems - A systematic literature review , 2013, J. Syst. Softw..

[27]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  Cooperative Micro Flip Teaching , 2016, HCI.

[28]  Mark William Johnson,et al.  Personal Learning Environments: Challenging the Dominant Design of Educational Systems , 2006, EC-TEL Workshops.

[29]  Olaf Zawacki-Richter,et al.  From the Back Door into the Mainstream: The Characteristics of Lifelong Learners , 2014 .

[30]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Elements of a Science of E-Learning , 2003 .

[31]  Antje Baer,et al.  E Learning Strategies For Delivering Knowledge In The Digital Age , 2016 .

[32]  Wanjira L. Kinuthia,et al.  Open Educational Resources: Innovation, Research and Practice , 2013 .

[33]  Aras Bozkurt,et al.  Research Trends in Turkish Distance Education: A Content Analysis of Dissertations, 1986-2014 , 2015, European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning.

[34]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  Open knowledge: challenges and facts , 2010, Online Inf. Rev..

[35]  Belinda Tynan,et al.  Distance learners: connected, mobile and resourceful individuals , 2012 .

[36]  Thomas Crouzier,et al.  Science Ecosystem 2.0: how will change occur? , 2015 .

[37]  Carlos Delgado Kloos,et al.  Analysing the Impact of Built-In and External Social Tools in a MOOC on Educational Technologies , 2013, EC-TEL.

[38]  John Brown,et al.  Gamification » Blog Archive » Gamification in Education: What, How, Why Bother? , 2014 .

[39]  R. Ramlogan,et al.  Innovation systems and the competitive process in developing economies , 2008 .

[40]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  Mobile Learning as an Asset for Development: Challenges and Oportunities , 2011, WSKS.

[41]  John Daniel,et al.  The Future of MOOCs: Adaptive Learning or Business Model? , 2015, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.

[42]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  A Theory Of Critical Inquiry In Online Distance Education , 2003 .

[43]  Betty Collis,et al.  Tele-Learning in a Digital World: The Future of Distance Learning , 1996 .

[44]  Francisco José García Peñalvo,et al.  Artesanía digital y modernidad educativa. , 2015 .

[45]  Brigid Barron Interest and Self-Sustained Learning as Catalysts of Development: A Learning Ecology Perspective , 2006, Human Development.

[46]  M. Lage,et al.  Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment , 2000 .

[47]  Marcus Foth,et al.  Ecologies of Innovation , 2007 .

[48]  Dolores Lerís López,et al.  Aprendizaje adaptativo en moodle: tres casos prácticos , 2015 .

[49]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  Informal learning recognition and management , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[50]  J. Wesley Baker,et al.  The "Classroom Flip": Using Web Course Management Tools to Become the Guide by the Side , 2000 .

[51]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  iMOOC Platform: Adaptive MOOCs , 2016, HCI.

[52]  Eric S. K. Yu,et al.  Understanding Software Ecosystems: A Strategic Modeling Approach , 2011, IWSECO@ICSOB.

[53]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[54]  Gráinne Conole,et al.  The 7Cs of learning design: a new approach to rethinking design practice , 2014 .

[55]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  Informal learning recognition through a cloud ecosystem , 2014, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[56]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  e-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning , 2002 .

[57]  Roberto Therón,et al.  Analítica visual en e-learning , 2014 .

[58]  Marie Bienkowski,et al.  Enhancing Teaching and Learning Through Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics: An Issue Brief , 2012 .

[59]  Janet R. Mccoll-Kennedy,et al.  Value propositions , 2014 .

[60]  María Soledad Ramírez Montoya,et al.  Acceso abierto y su repercusión en la Sociedad del Conocimiento: Reflexiones de casos prácticos en Latinoamérica , 2015 .

[61]  สุธััญญา ด้วงอินทร์,et al.  Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day , 2017 .

[62]  Matthias Jarke,et al.  The 3P Learning Model , 2010, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[63]  Aubteen Darabi,et al.  Effectiveness of Online Discussion Strategies: A Meta-Analysis , 2013 .

[64]  Terry Anderson,et al.  E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Community of Inquiry Framework for Research and Practice , 2016 .

[65]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  An evolving Learning Management System for new educational environments using 2.0 tools , 2014, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[66]  David Maniega-Legarda,et al.  El modelo educativo de la UOC : evolución y perspectivas , 2009 .

[67]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  Improving LO Quality through Instructional Design Based on an Ontological Model and Metadata , 2007, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[68]  Benjamin Hirsch,et al.  Education beyond the cloud: Anytime-anywhere learning in a smart campus environment , 2011, 2011 International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions.

[69]  Yannis Psaromiligkos,et al.  Towards Networked Learning Analytics - A concept and a tool , 2006 .

[70]  José Carlos Sánchez Prieto,et al.  Understanding mobile learning: devices, pedagogical implications and research lines , 2014 .

[71]  Alicia Garca-Holgado,et al.  Architectural pattern to improve the definition and implementation of eLearning ecosystems , 2016 .

[72]  David Richard Moore,et al.  E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning , 2006 .

[73]  Hiroki Yoshida Perceived Usefulness of “Flipped Learning” on Instructional Design for Elementary and Secondary Education: With Focus on Pre-service Teacher Education , 2016 .

[74]  Aaron Sams,et al.  Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day , 2012 .

[75]  Nishikant Sonwalkar,et al.  The First Adaptive MOOC: A Case Study on Pedagogy Framework and Scalable Cloud Architecture—Part I , 2013 .

[76]  Francisco José García-Peñalvo,et al.  Learning management system: evolving from silos to structures , 2014, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[77]  Nada Dabbagh,et al.  Pedagogical Models for E-Learning: A Theory-Based Design Framework , 2005 .

[78]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  Learning technology specifications: semantic objects for adaptive learning environments , 2005, Int. J. Learn. Technol..

[79]  Slinger Jansen,et al.  A sense of community: A research agenda for software ecosystems , 2009, 2009 31st International Conference on Software Engineering - Companion Volume.

[80]  Kathleen P. Fulton Time for Learning: Top 10 Reasons Why Flipping the Classroom Can Change Education , 2014 .

[81]  V. Kavitha,et al.  A survey on security issues in service delivery models of cloud computing , 2011, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[82]  J. Chataway,et al.  Knowledge Ecologies and Ecosystems? An Empirically Grounded Reflection on Recent Developments in Innovation Systems Theory , 2009 .

[83]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Growing Up: Digital: How the Web Changes Work, Education, and the Ways People Learn , 2000 .

[84]  George Siemens Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age , 2004 .

[85]  한지영 공학교육에서 Flipped Learning 적용 , 2016 .

[86]  Charles Schlosser,et al.  Distance Education: Review of the Literature , 1994 .

[87]  Stefan Biffl,et al.  Software ecosystems vs. natural ecosystems: learning from the ingenious mind of nature , 2010, ECSA '10.

[88]  Elaine Tan,et al.  Using ‘Formally’ Informal Blogs to Create Learning Communities for Students on a Teaching and Learning Programme: Peer Mentoring and Reflective Spaces , 2014 .