Precrash Dipping Nose (PCDN) Needs Pedestrian Recognition

This paper investigates the effect of vehicle front height lowering operation of precrash dipping nose (PCDN) on pedestrians. Although PCDN was developed for vehicle-vehicle side crashes, there is a possibility that the range sensor for crash detection will fail to distinguish a group of pedestrians from a side-faced vehicle. For simulation-based investigation, a vehicle model, an air spring with PCDN actuator, a pedestrian, and active hood system (AHS) were modeled. Two vehicle models were made for a sedan and a sport utility vehicle (SUV), respectively. In all crash situations (frontal crash without AHS, frontal crash with AHS, and side crash without AHS), a falsely operated PCDN is expected to cause worse pedestrian injury. As a conclusion, we insist that PCDN should incorporate a pedestrian-recognition capability into its crash detection system to reduce the improper activation of its actuator. In addition, as AHS showed a good performance even in improper activation, we propose a complementary method that activates AHS when PCDN is activated. It is noteworthy that the increasing importance of pedestrian protection seems to enforce even a system developed for vehicle-vehicle crashes to be investigated from the perspective of pedestrian safety.

[1]  Louise A. Obergefell,et al.  The development of the GEBOD program , 1996, Proceedings of the 1996 Fifteenth Southern Biomedical Engineering Conference.

[2]  Hampton C Gabler,et al.  The fatality and injury risk of light truck impacts with pedestrians in the United States. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Joachim Schäfer,et al.  Structural Hood and Hinge Concepts for Pedestrian Protection , 2005 .

[4]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Smart Automotive Airbags: Occupant Classification and Tracking , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[5]  Luis Martínez PEDESTRIAN ACCIDENT RECONSTRUCTION: REVIEW AND UPDATE , 2000 .

[6]  B S Roudsari,et al.  Pedestrian crashes: higher injury severity and mortality rate for light truck vehicles compared with passenger vehicles , 2004, Injury Prevention.

[7]  D. Otte,et al.  Investigation of Head Injuries by Reconstructions of Real-World Vehicle-Versus-Adult-Pedestrian Accidents , 2008 .

[8]  Pedestrian accident reconstruction , 1994 .

[9]  Markus Heinisch,et al.  Motor vehicle with a pre-safe system , 2003 .

[10]  Michael McCarthy,et al.  Advanced Protection for Vulnerable Road Users: A Case Study , 2006 .

[11]  H. Rohling,et al.  Target classification based on near-distance radar sensors , 2004, IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2004.

[12]  Rikard Fredriksson,et al.  EVALUATION OF A NEW PEDESTRIAN HEAD INJURY PROTECTION SYSTEM WITH A SENSOR IN THE BUMPER AND LIFTING OF THE BONNET’S REAR PART , 2001 .

[13]  H. Saunders,et al.  Mechanical Engineering Design (4th Ed.) , 1985 .

[14]  Joseph Edward Shigley,et al.  Mechanical engineering design , 1972 .

[15]  Marc-Michael Meinecke,et al.  Side-Pre-Crash Sensing System for Automatic Vehicle Height Level Adaptation , 2006 .

[16]  Mark Howard,et al.  Comprehensive approach to increased pedestrian safety in pedestrian-to-car accidents , 2002 .

[17]  Jason R. Kerrigan,et al.  Investigating Pedestrian Kinematics with the Polar-II Finite Element Model , 2007 .

[18]  Tarak Gandhi,et al.  Pedestrian Protection Systems: Issues, Survey, and Challenges , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[19]  Gyung-Jin Park,et al.  Design of the active hood lift system using orthogonal arrays , 2008 .

[20]  Robert Fröming,et al.  Requirement Engineering for Active Safety Pedestrian Protection Systems based on Accident Research , 2006 .

[21]  Denis P. Wood,et al.  Pedestrian Risk from Cars and Sport Utility Vehicles - A Comparative Analytical Study , 2006 .

[22]  J. Crandall,et al.  Designing road vehicles for pedestrian protection , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[23]  Hoon Huh,et al.  CRASHWORTHINESS ASSESSMENT OF SIDE IMPACT OF AN AUTO-BODY WITH 60TRIP STEEL FOR SIDE MEMBERS , 2003 .