Classification of High and Low Intelligent Individuals Using Pupil and Eye Blink

A commonly used method to determine the intelligence of an individual is a group test. It checks accuracy and response time while they solve a series of problems. However, it takes long time and is often inaccurate if the difficulty level of problems is high or the number of problems is too small. Therefore, there is an urgent need to find an objective, readily available, fast and more reliable method to determine the intelligence level of individuals. In this paper, we propose an alternative method to distinguish between high and low intelligent individuals using pupillary response and eye blink pattern. Studies have shown that these measures indicate the cognitive state of an individual more accurately and objectively. Our experimental results show that the bio-signals between high and low intelligent individuals are significantly different and proposed method has good performance.

[1]  H. Gardner,et al.  Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences , 1983 .

[2]  Hideki Ohira,et al.  Effects of Stimulus Valence on Recognition Memory and Endogenous Eyeblinks: Further Evidence for Positive-Negative Asymmetry , 1998 .

[3]  K. Fukuda,et al.  Eye blinks: new indices for the detection of deception. , 2001, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[4]  E. Granholm,et al.  Pupillary responses index cognitive resource limitations. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[5]  Erik J. Sirevaag,et al.  MULTI-DIMENSIONAL CHARACTERIZATIONS OF OPERATOR STATE: A VALIDATION OF OCULOMOTOR METRICS , 1999 .

[6]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Eyeblinks and cognition , 2011 .

[7]  Jyh-Shing Roger Jang,et al.  ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system , 1993, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[8]  Peter Robinson,et al.  Generalization of a Vision-Based Computational Model of Mind-Reading , 2005, ACII.

[9]  Jon Louis Bentley,et al.  An Algorithm for Finding Best Matches in Logarithmic Expected Time , 1977, TOMS.

[10]  Isabell Wartenburger,et al.  Resource allocation and fluid intelligence: insights from pupillometry. , 2010, Psychophysiology.

[11]  Pat Langley,et al.  Estimating Continuous Distributions in Bayesian Classifiers , 1995, UAI.

[12]  M. Just,et al.  Neuroindices of cognitive workload: Neuroimaging, pupillometric and event-related potential studies of brain work , 2003 .

[13]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods , 2000 .

[14]  Minho Lee,et al.  In-attention State Monitoring for a Driver Based on Head Pose and Eye Blinking Detection Using One Class Support Vector Machine , 2014, ICONIP.

[15]  Andrew Olney,et al.  Gaze tutor: A gaze-reactive intelligent tutoring system , 2012, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[16]  D. Wechsler,et al.  Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) , 2010 .

[17]  Amitash Ojha,et al.  Modulation of resource allocation by intelligent individuals in linguistic, mathematical and visuo-spatial tasks. , 2015, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.