Novel methods of qualitative analysis for health policy research

BackgroundCurrently, thanks to the growing number of public database resources, most evidence on planning and management, healthcare institutions, policies and practices is becoming available to everyone. However, one of the limitations for the advancement of data and literature-driven research has been the lack of flexibility of the methodological resources used in qualitative research. There is a need to incorporate friendly, cheaper and faster tools for the systematic, unbiased analysis of large data corpora, in particular regarding the qualitative aspects of the information (often overlooked).MethodsThis article proposes a series of novel techniques, exemplified by the case of the role of Institutional Committees of Bioethics to (1) massively identify the documents relevant to a given issue, (2) extract the fundamental content, focusing on qualitative analysis, (3) synthesize the findings in the published literature, (4) categorize and visualize the evidence, and (5) analyse and report the results.ResultsA critical study of the institutional role of public health policies and practices in Institutional Committees of Bioethics was used as an example application of the method. Interactive strategies were helpful to define and conceptualise variables, propose research questions and refine research interpretation. These methods are additional aids to systematic reviews, pre-coding schemes and construction of a priori diagrams to survey and analyse social science literature.ConclusionsThese novel methods have proven to facilitate the formulation and testing of hypotheses on the subjects to be studied. Such tools may allow important advances going from descriptive approaches to decision-making and even institutional assessment and policy redesign, by pragmatic reason of time and costs.

[1]  I. Roque,et al.  METODOLOGÍA DE LA INVESTIGACIÓN , 2019, Cultura de emprendimiento corporativo en las micro, pequeñas y medianas empresas colombianas.

[2]  Michele Mauri,et al.  RAWGraphs: A Visualisation Platform to Create Open Outputs , 2017, CHItaly.

[3]  A. Grewal,et al.  Literature search for research planning and identification of research problem , 2016, Indian journal of anaesthesia.

[4]  R. D. de Vries,et al.  The Moral Organization of the Professions , 2009, Current sociology. La Sociologie contemporaine.

[5]  Rodrigo García-Herrera,et al.  Mapping the Structure and Dynamics of Genomics-Related MeSH Terms Complex Networks , 2014, PloS one.

[6]  Cristina Zurbriggen El institucionalismo centrado en los actores: una perspectiva analítica en el estudio de las políticas públicas , 2006 .

[7]  Brigitte Smit,et al.  Atlas.ti for qualitative data analysis , 2002 .

[8]  Helvi Kyngäs,et al.  The qualitative content analysis process. , 2008, Journal of advanced nursing.

[9]  J. Montgomery Bioethics as a Governance Practice , 2016, Health Care Analysis.

[10]  A. Bryman Social Research Methods , 2001 .

[11]  Enrique Hernández-Lemus,et al.  Information theoretical methods for complex network structure reconstruction , 2013, Complex Adapt. Syst. Model..

[12]  N. Fairclough Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. , 2001 .

[13]  Sungsoo Hwang,et al.  Utilizing Qualitative Data Analysis Software , 2008 .

[14]  R. McDougall Reviewing Literature in Bioethics Research: Increasing Rigour in Non‐Systematic Reviews , 2015, Bioethics.

[15]  L. Hicks Book Review: Social Work Research and Evaluation: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches , 2006 .

[16]  Muaz A. Niazi,et al.  Multidisciplinary applications of complex networks modeling, simulation, visualization, and analysis , 2013, Complex Adapt. Syst. Model..

[17]  E. B. Pineda,et al.  Metodología de la investigación , 2008 .

[18]  B. Salter,et al.  Bioethics and the Global Moral Economy , 2007 .

[19]  Joanna Smith,et al.  Reviewing the literature , 2012, Evidence-Based Nursing.

[20]  S. Kelly Public Bioethics and Publics: Consensus, Boundaries, and Participation in Biomedical Science Policy , 2003, Science, technology & human values.

[21]  H. Turunen,et al.  Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. , 2013, Nursing & health sciences.

[22]  B. Spielman Bioethics in Law , 2006 .

[23]  Debra Revere,et al.  An Information Extraction and Representation System for Rapid Review of the Biomedical Literature , 2004, MedInfo.

[24]  Alexander Bogner,et al.  How Politics Deals with Expert Dissent: The Case of Ethics Councils , 2010 .

[25]  Brigitte Smit Atlas.ti for qualitative data analysis : research paper , 2002 .

[26]  R. García-Herrera,et al.  A systematic approach to analyze the social determinants of cardiovascular disease , 2018, PloS one.

[27]  R. McDougall Systematic reviews in bioethics: types, challenges, and value. , 2014, The Journal of medicine and philosophy.

[28]  Summer Johnson Multiple Roles and Successes in Public Bioethics: A Response to the Public Forum Critique of Bioethics Commissions , 2006, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal.

[29]  T. Muhr ATLAS/ti — A prototype for the support of text interpretation , 1991 .

[30]  C. Hardy,et al.  Discourse and Institutions , 2004 .

[31]  Summer Johnson The impact of presidential bioethics commissions : an assessment of outcomes in public bioethics , 2007 .

[32]  N. Fairclough Discourse and Text: Linguistic and Intertextual Analysis within Discourse Analysis , 1992 .

[33]  Wilmar Aníbal Peña Collazos La violencia simbólica Como reproducción Biopolítica del poder , 2009 .

[34]  Hanne Foss Hansen,et al.  The Evidence Movement , 2009 .

[35]  Steve Jacob,et al.  Using systematic review methods within a Ph.D. dissertation in political science: challenges and lessons learned from practice* , 2014 .

[36]  H. Starks,et al.  Choose Your Method: A Comparison of Phenomenology, Discourse Analysis, and Grounded Theory , 2007, Qualitative health research.

[37]  D. Strech,et al.  What methods do reviews of normative ethics literature use for search, selection, analysis, and synthesis? In-depth results from a systematic review of reviews , 2017, Systematic Reviews.

[38]  Enrique Hernández-Lemus,et al.  Health Systems as Complex Systems , 2013 .