Fast approximate delivery of fluence maps : the VMAT case

In this article we provide a method to generate the trade-off between 10 delivery time and fluence map matching quality for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). At the heart of our method lies a mathematical programming model that, for a given duration of delivery, optimizes leaf trajectories and dose rates such that the desired fluence map is reproduced as well as possible. This model was presented for the single map case in a companion paper (Craft & 15 Balvert n.d.). The resulting large-scale, non-convex optimization problem was solved using a heuristic approach. The single-map approach cannot directly be applied to the full arc case due to the large increase in model size, the issue of allocating delivery times to each of the arc segments, and the fact that the ending leaf positions for one map will be the starting leaf positions for the next map. In 20 this article the method proposed in Craft & Balvert (n.d.) is extended to solve the full map treatment planning problem. We test our method using a prostate case and a head and neck case, and present the resulting trade-off curves. Analysis of the leaf trajectories reveal that short time plans have larger leaf openings in general than longer delivery time plans. Our method allows one to explore the 25 continuum of possibilities between coarse, large segment plans characteristic of direct aperture approaches and narrow field plans produced by sliding window approaches. Exposing this trade off will allow for an informed choice between plan quality and solution time. Further research is required to speed up the optimization process to make this method clinically implementable. 30

[1]  Wei Chen,et al.  Including robustness in multi-criteria optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  K. Otto,et al.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy for delivery of prostate radiotherapy: comparison with intensity-modulated radiotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  Johannes A Langendijk,et al.  Multicriteria optimization enables less experienced planners to efficiently produce high quality treatment plans in head and neck cancer radiotherapy , 2015, Radiation oncology.

[4]  Cedric X. Yu,et al.  Leaf-sequencing for intensity-modulated arc therapy using graph algorithms. , 2007, Medical physics.

[5]  Wei Chen,et al.  Multicriteria VMAT optimization. , 2011, Medical physics.

[6]  W Schlegel,et al.  Dynamic X-ray compensation for conformal radiotherapy by means of multi-leaf collimation. , 1994, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[7]  Danny Ziyi Chen,et al.  Coupled Path Planning, Region Optimization, and Applications in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy , 2008, ESA.

[8]  R. Bokrantz Multicriteria optimization for volumetric-modulated arc therapy by decomposition into a fluence-based relaxation and a segment weight-based restriction. , 2012, Medical physics.

[9]  Lei Xing,et al.  Optimization approaches to volumetric modulated arc therapy planning. , 2015, Medical physics.

[10]  M A Earl,et al.  An arc-sequencing algorithm for intensity modulated arc therapy. , 2007, Medical physics.

[11]  C. Clark,et al.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy: a review of current literature and clinical use in practice. , 2011, The British journal of radiology.

[12]  M. Gaddy,et al.  Technical Note: Improving the VMERGE treatment planning algorithm for rotational radiotherapy. , 2016, Medical physics.