Economic and environmental life cycle assessment of a short-span aluminium composite bridge deck in Canada

Abstract The costs to maintain Quebec's infrastructure—most of which was built in the 1960s and 1970s—are considerable, and major maintenance and reconstruction will be required in the coming years. In recent years, aluminum associations promote the increase of aluminum use in infrastructure and especially in bridge construction. This research aims to investigate the advantages of using aluminum deck bridges, which require less maintenance than traditional materials due to the natural resistance to atmospheric corrosion of aluminum, despite their higher investment costs that may limit their deployment. More specifically, the study compares for the first time the life cycle costs and environmental impacts of an aluminum-steel composite deck with a more traditional concrete-steel composite deck and provides a parametrized model allowing practitioners and designers to perform screening life cycle assessment and cost of short span bridge based on our data and results. Results show that the initial cost of aluminum deck is double that of concrete deck, but the overall cost is actually four times lower over the entire life cycle. The environmental results demonstrate the benefits of aluminum deck. Our main recommendation for future decision making in road infrastructure management is therefore to systematically expand the scope of the analysis integrating a full life cycle thinking also including the effects from traffic diversion.

[1]  R.G.B. Mitchell 2 – Building and Construction , 1970 .

[2]  Jean-Philippe Waaub,et al.  Electrification of the Canadian Road Transportation Sector: A 2050 Outlook with TIMES-Canada , 2013 .

[3]  Helena Gervásio,et al.  Comparative life-cycle analysis of steel-concrete composite bridges , 2008 .

[4]  Gregor Wernet,et al.  The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[5]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology , 2003 .

[6]  Tuomo Rantala Life cycle analysis of three Finnish standard bridges , 2010 .

[7]  Alexis Laurent,et al.  IMPACT World+: a globally regionalized life cycle impact assessment method , 2019, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[8]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Integrated Life-Cycle Assessment and Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Model for Concrete Bridge Deck Applications , 2008 .

[9]  Alexis Laurent,et al.  Limitations of carbon footprint as indicator of environmental sustainability. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  J.A.H. Oates,et al.  Construction and Building , 2007 .

[11]  B. Weidema,et al.  Monetary valuation in Life Cycle Assessment: a review , 2015 .

[12]  David L. Weimer,et al.  “Just give me a number!” Practical values for the social discount rate , 2004 .

[13]  Yoshito Itoh,et al.  Using CO2 emission quantities in bridge lifecycle analysis , 2003 .

[14]  R. Daniel ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS TO STRUCTURAL MATERIAL SELECTION FOR A BRIDGE , 2003 .

[15]  Valbona Mara,et al.  Comparative study of different bridge concepts based on life-cycle cost analyses and life-cycle assessment , 2013 .

[16]  Víctor Yepes,et al.  Selection of Sustainable Short-Span Bridge Design in Brazil , 2019, Sustainability.

[17]  Werner Mader,et al.  Schwansbell Bridge celebrating 50th Birthday , 2006 .

[18]  C. Vargel,et al.  The corrosion of aluminium , 2004, Corrosion of Aluminium.

[19]  Christopher D. Eamon,et al.  Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of Alternative Reinforcement Materials for Bridge Superstructures Considering Cost and Maintenance Uncertainties , 2012 .

[20]  Yurong Zhang,et al.  Life cycle environmental impact assessment of a bridge with different strengthening schemes , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[21]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  Data quality management for life cycle inventories—an example of using data quality indicators☆ , 1996 .

[22]  R. Karoumi,et al.  Soil-steel composite bridge: An alternative design solution for short spans considering LCA , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[23]  Christian Gollier,et al.  Pricing the Planet's Future , 2012 .

[24]  Tomasz Siwowski,et al.  Aluminium Bridges – Past, Present and Future , 2006 .

[25]  Z. Lounis,et al.  Benefits of internal curing on service life and life-cycle cost of high-performance concrete bridge decks – A case study , 2010 .

[26]  A. Bailey,et al.  ‘They had to Go’: Indian Older Adults’ Experiences of Rationalizing and Compensating the Absence of Migrant Children , 2018, Sustainability.

[27]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  Using the budget constraint to monetarise impact assessment results , 2009 .

[28]  Ignacio J. Navarro,et al.  Environmental and Social Impact Assessment of Optimized Post-Tensioned Concrete Road Bridges , 2020, Sustainability.

[29]  Helge Brattebø,et al.  Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Bridges , 2013 .

[30]  A. Al-Ghandoor,et al.  Energy and Exergy Analyses of Different Aluminum Reduction Technologies , 2018 .