The Flatness of Bifurcations in 3D Dendritic Trees: An Optimal Design

The geometry of natural branching systems generally reflects functional optimization. A common property is that their bifurcations are planar and that daughter segments do not turn back in the direction of the parent segment. The present study investigates whether this also applies to bifurcations in 3D dendritic arborizations. This question was earlier addressed in a first study of flatness of 3D dendritic bifurcations by Uylings and Smit (1975), who used the apex angle of the right circular cone as flatness measure. The present study was inspired by recent renewed interest in this measure. Because we encountered ourselves shortcomings of this cone angle measure, the search for an optimal measure for flatness of 3D bifurcation was the second aim of our study. Therefore, a number of measures has been developed in order to quantify flatness and orientation properties of spatial bifurcations. All these measures have been expressed mathematically in terms of the three bifurcation angles between the three pairs of segments in the bifurcation. The flatness measures have been applied and evaluated to bifurcations in rat cortical pyramidal cell basal and apical dendritic trees, and to random spatial bifurcations. Dendritic and random bifurcations show significant different flatness measure distributions, supporting the conclusion that dendritic bifurcations are significantly more flat than random bifurcations. Basal dendritic bifurcations also show the property that their parent segments are generally aligned oppositely to the bisector of the angle between their daughter segments, resulting in “symmetrical” configurations. Such geometries may arise when during neuronal development the segments at a newly formed bifurcation are subjected to elastic tensions, which force the bifurcation into an equilibrium planar shape. Apical bifurcations, however, have parent segments oppositely aligned with one of the daughter segments. These geometries arise in the case of side branching from an existing apical main stem. The aligned “apical” parent and “apical” daughter segment form together with the side branch daughter segment already geometrically a flat configuration. These properties are clearly reflected in the flatness measure distributions. Comparison of the different flatness measures made clear that they all capture flatness properties in a different way. Selection of the most appropriate measure thus depends on the question of research. For our purpose of quantifying flatness and orientation of the segments, the dihedral angle β was found to be the most discriminative and applicable single measure. Alternatively, the parent elevation and azimuth angle formed an orthogonal pair of measures most clearly demonstrating the dendritic bifurcation “symmetry” properties.

[1]  Ronald A. J. van Elburg,et al.  Impact of Dendritic Size and Dendritic Topology on Burst Firing in Pyramidal Cells , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[2]  E. De Schutter,et al.  Local planar dendritic structure: a uniquely biological phenomenon? , 2009, BMC Neuroscience.

[3]  J. Blom,et al.  Modelling genetic regulation of growth and form in a branching sponge , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  Dmitri B Chklovskii,et al.  A cost-benefit analysis of neuronal morphology. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Adrian Bejan,et al.  Design with constructal theory , 2008 .

[6]  R S Trask,et al.  Minimum mass vascular networks in multifunctional materials , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[7]  Robert E Burke,et al.  Simulation of motoneuron morphology in three dimensions. I. Building individual dendritic trees , 2007, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[8]  Robert E Burke,et al.  Simulation of motoneuron morphology in three dimensions. II. Building complete neurons , 2007, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[9]  A. V. Manzhirov,et al.  Handbook of mathematics for engineers and scientists , 2006 .

[10]  G. Ascoli,et al.  Quantitative morphometry of hippocampal pyramidal cells: Differences between anatomical classes and reconstructing laboratories , 2004, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[11]  Christopher Cherniak,et al.  Local optimization of neuron arbors , 1992, Biological Cybernetics.

[12]  Ronald G. Driggers,et al.  Encyclopedia of optical engineering , 2003 .

[13]  Jaap van Pelt,et al.  Measures for quantifying dendritic arborizations , 2002, Network.

[14]  Jaap van Pelt,et al.  Branching rates and growth functions in the outgrowth of dendritic branching patterns , 2002, Network.

[15]  Claude Brezinski,et al.  Numerical recipes in Fortran (The art of scientific computing) : W.H. Press, S.A. Teukolsky, W.T. Vetterling and B.P. Flannery, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2nd ed., 1992. 963 pp., US$49.95, ISBN 0-521-43064-X.☆ , 1993 .

[16]  J. van Pelt,et al.  A model for outgrowth of branching neurites , 1992 .

[17]  R. Buxbaum,et al.  Growth cone behavior and production of traction force , 1990, The Journal of cell biology.

[18]  R. Buxbaum,et al.  The cytomechanics of axonal elongation and retraction , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[19]  Robert E. Buxbaum,et al.  Direct evidence that growth cones pull , 1989, Nature.

[20]  R. Buxbaum,et al.  Tension and compression in the cytoskeleton of PC-12 neurites. II: Quantitative measurements. , 1988, The Journal of cell biology.

[21]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN - The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd Edition , 1987 .

[22]  H. Haug History of neuromorphometry , 1986, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[23]  R. Buxbaum,et al.  Tension and compression in the cytoskeleton of PC 12 neurites , 1985, The Journal of cell biology.

[24]  M. J. Katz How straight do axons grow? , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[25]  A. van Oosterom,et al.  The Solid Angle of a Plane Triangle , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  Hans-Jochen Bartsch Taschenbuch Mathematischer Formeln , 1982 .

[27]  D. Bray,et al.  Mechanical tension produced by nerve cells in tissue culture. , 1979, Journal of cell science.

[28]  K. Kuypers,et al.  Effects of differential environments on plasticity of dendrites of cortical pyramidal neurons in adult rats , 1978, Experimental Neurology.

[29]  H. Uylings,et al.  Environmental influences on the neocortex in later life. , 1978, Progress in brain research.

[30]  H. Uylings,et al.  Optimization of diameters and bifurcation angles in lung and vascular tree structures. , 1977, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[31]  William Simon,et al.  Semiautomatic Tracking of Neuronal Processes , 1977 .

[32]  T. McMahon,et al.  Tree structures: deducing the principle of mechanical design. , 1976, Journal of theoretical biology.

[33]  G. J. Smit,et al.  The morphometry of the branching pattern in dendrites of the visual cortex pyramidal cells , 1975, Brain Research.

[34]  H Haug,et al.  Stereological methods in the analysis of neuronal parameters in the central nervous system * , 1972, Journal of microscopy.

[35]  R. Rosen Optimality Principles in Biology , 1967, Springer US.

[36]  H. Dittmer A Comparative Study of the Number and Length of Roots Produced in Nineteen Angiosperm Species , 1948, Botanical Gazette.

[37]  J. Donnay,et al.  Spherical Trigonometry after the Cesaro Method. , 1946 .

[38]  Howard J. Dittmer,et al.  A QUANTITATIVE STUDY OF THE ROOTS AND ROOT HAIRS OF A WINTER RYE PLANT (SECALE CEREALE) , 1937 .

[39]  D'arcy W. Thompson On Growth and Form , 1917, Nature.

[40]  John Casey A Treatise on Spherical Trigonometry, and its Application to Geodesy and Astronomy , 1889 .